QUOTE(radver @ Jun 26 2012, 10:27 PM)
I had the same dilemma last year when i was choosing air cond.
What I was told by the air cond technician is that, unless you on the air cond for around 10 hrs or long periods of time, there is no difference between them.
Because from what I understand, inverter saves electricity by maintaining the temperature through constantly cooling and running at low power.
While non inverter air cond maintains the temperature by cooling it down to the desired level, stops cooling and will only start cooling again after the temperature rises to a certain level.
This act of cooling and stopping takes up a lot of electricity, as more electricity is needed to restart the cooling as compared to running the cooling at low power continuously.
Thats what I understand, please correct me if I'm wrong...
So if you're just using for your living room, there should be no need for an inverter. Plus the price difference between inverter and non inverter is not exactly small.
As for brand, my recommendation would be PANASONIC. Its more expensive compare to the rest but each of them have lasted at least 10 yrs before breaking down and requiring extensive repair. When that time came, I just bought a new one...
Currently for my house I bought 5 air cond, all PANASONIC. 3 unit 1.5 hp and 2 unit 1 hp. 2 unit 1.5 hp in the living room and 1 unit 1.5 hp in the master bedrooom. Electric bill stands at around RM200-300, no tampering of my power meter.
My neighbor using dunno what brand, dunno how he use, he is complaining of paying RM800 a month.
And please take note, normal house circuit only can take total 4 hp of air cond running at any one time.
The more correct way of saying is "Inverter air cond will save electricity IF there are frequent stop-start situation". What I was told by the air cond technician is that, unless you on the air cond for around 10 hrs or long periods of time, there is no difference between them.
Because from what I understand, inverter saves electricity by maintaining the temperature through constantly cooling and running at low power.
While non inverter air cond maintains the temperature by cooling it down to the desired level, stops cooling and will only start cooling again after the temperature rises to a certain level.
This act of cooling and stopping takes up a lot of electricity, as more electricity is needed to restart the cooling as compared to running the cooling at low power continuously.
Thats what I understand, please correct me if I'm wrong...
So if you're just using for your living room, there should be no need for an inverter. Plus the price difference between inverter and non inverter is not exactly small.
As for brand, my recommendation would be PANASONIC. Its more expensive compare to the rest but each of them have lasted at least 10 yrs before breaking down and requiring extensive repair. When that time came, I just bought a new one...
Currently for my house I bought 5 air cond, all PANASONIC. 3 unit 1.5 hp and 2 unit 1 hp. 2 unit 1.5 hp in the living room and 1 unit 1.5 hp in the master bedrooom. Electric bill stands at around RM200-300, no tampering of my power meter.
My neighbor using dunno what brand, dunno how he use, he is complaining of paying RM800 a month.
And please take note, normal house circuit only can take total 4 hp of air cond running at any one time.
Example:
1. Tiny air cond in very big room. No stop-start situation so no saving.
2. Big air cond in small room. Frequent stop-start situation so save lots of electricity
Jun 27 2012, 11:57 AM

Quote
0.0496sec
0.30
7 queries
GZIP Disabled