Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Micro Four Thirds (m43) User Thread V5, Panasonic & Olympus Mirrorless System!
|
kenary820
|
Jan 21 2013, 07:43 AM
|
|
QUOTE(sevenor @ Jan 21 2013, 01:22 AM) I think focus peaking is over-hyped. I had used Sony NEX cameras (which have focus peaking function) before and found that you won't be able to tell for sure whether the colours have peaked already or not. I prefer to use the magnification feature (provided you don't set it to higher than x5 because anything higher the image will be very shaky and be of no use either). Just my dua sen worth.  thanks for your advice..can post video of demo? some of us are noobie, sometimes cannot imagine what being discussed especially on the MF lens. thanks. ps: i'm courious about focus peeking on MF how its done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
kenary820
|
Jan 25 2013, 06:38 PM
|
|
weekend spam... Walk-in-woods by m.s.@.n., on Flickr
|
|
|
|
|
|
kenary820
|
Jan 26 2013, 05:31 PM
|
|
QUOTE(ecjl @ Jan 26 2013, 01:06 PM) it just a handheld snapshot, but i like the lines dat why i shared..the blur mostly the moving leaves. neway i think its natural jungle path created by the water stream (that dried) at Mulu National Park. Cheers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
kenary820
|
Jan 26 2013, 05:38 PM
|
|
thinks of buying cctv lens f1.4 isit worth trying? even though it consider cheap, i don't want buying somethg that might just sit on drybox. hope some member here can share some experienced using this lens. thx.
p/s: now i only have f2.8 max
|
|
|
|
|
|
kenary820
|
Feb 3 2013, 11:43 PM
|
|
weekend spam..stitch from 4 photo with the 14mm Nature by m.s.@.n., on Flickr
|
|
|
|
|
|
kenary820
|
Feb 8 2013, 08:05 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Jason @ Feb 3 2013, 05:57 AM) EPM-2 w/kit lens. Haven't taken pictures with a proper camera in the last 10 years...Kit lens is also pretty piss poor..IMO. Quickly learned that I need a smaller lens, and a faster lens as well. Panny 14mm and 25mm here I come. Auto ISO always selects 1600 zzz. Too aggressive IMO. Long Shan Temple by ixeo, on Flickr Fishes by ixeo, on Flickr Taipei 101 by ixeo, on Flickr Critics, suggestions welcomed. kitlens is ok..but i feel the pana have better build than the oly..if you love to do landscape i would suggest to get a uwa..i like uwa for landscape cos of the distortion..the only downside m43 uwa is so damn xpensive compare to dslr version..the other option is fisheye like samyang..however imho the uwa is versatile compared to fisheye..
|
|
|
|
|
|
kenary820
|
Feb 8 2013, 10:54 AM
|
|
QUOTE(NISMOgan @ Feb 8 2013, 09:09 AM) totally agreed with kenery. hope tamron & sigma come out with line up..practically we are paying for precision glass and the build..but the glass on uwa is much smaller then the ff glass..think its a ripoff in the name of lightness hehe..
|
|
|
|
|
|
kenary820
|
Feb 8 2013, 07:54 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Jason @ Feb 8 2013, 03:52 PM) Agreed, the Panasonic 7-14mm is really good lens, and the pricing reflects that. Too rich for my blood! I don't use UWA so often. We need some competition from Sigma and Tamron to drive the price down. tamron are known for making sharp lens for a low price..and sigma better build + coating. I would not hesitate pairing sigma 1020 on m43 for long exposure shot. wish the auto adaptor from kipon available now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
kenary820
|
Feb 10 2013, 12:23 PM
|
|
Weekend spam..cannot afford uwa, alternatively 4 photo stitch to make a panorama. Sungai Sarawak by m.s.@.n., on Flickr
|
|
|
|
|
|
kenary820
|
Feb 12 2013, 07:42 AM
|
|
I'm impress what 14mm can do. The wide & short focus characteristic do handy. Just photo of cat at home. Little kitty..meoooww by m.s.@.n., on Flickr Little kitty..again by m.s.@.n., on Flickr
|
|
|
|
|
|
kenary820
|
Feb 19 2013, 07:58 AM
|
|
QUOTE(pakutekan @ Feb 19 2013, 04:00 AM) now considering to get used pen E-pl1 with 14-42mm lens + underwater casing (i want to used for scuba) for rm1800.. is it ok? why dont consider pns like sony rx100. some quote better DR. anyway are you looking forward to expand your lens and maybe add light for your underwater setup. I guess that what are the things to consider. Is 1442 meet your criteria. Check on flickr if any underwater photo that you like taken with oly +1442. If yes go for it, everything else more or less about skills + composition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
kenary820
|
Feb 20 2013, 08:43 PM
|
|
hi guys,
considering to get samyang 8mm. may i know where can get the adapter and standard price..thx.
|
|
|
|
|
|
kenary820
|
Feb 20 2013, 09:27 PM
|
|
QUOTE(NISMOgan @ Feb 20 2013, 09:23 PM) i`m not an expert at all but I feel your flash are too much? arent the samyang 8mm for m43? why you wanna get an adapter? or you are planning to get a non m43? ya since its manual lens i'm thinking wanna use it for both canon and gx1. 2 bird one stone
|
|
|
|
|
|
kenary820
|
Feb 20 2013, 09:28 PM
|
|
oya samyang 7.5mm for m43
|
|
|
|
|
|
kenary820
|
Feb 24 2013, 06:31 AM
|
|
QUOTE(tcm7782 @ Feb 24 2013, 01:27 AM) no flash use P1130174 by tcm7782, on Flickr P1130175 by tcm7782, on Flickr P1130177 by tcm7782, on Flickr P1130189 by tcm7782, on Flickr P1130194 by tcm7782, on Flickr P1130195 by tcm7782, on Flickr Beautifully done even on natural light..bro tcm maybe can go somewhere like butterfly park if any since your setup doesnt involve speedlight + diffuser..just suggetion
|
|
|
|
|
|
kenary820
|
Feb 26 2013, 12:03 AM
|
|
Any m43 member here attached the camera to digiscope?
|
|
|
|
|
|
kenary820
|
Feb 26 2013, 12:06 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kenary820
|
Feb 27 2013, 03:12 PM
|
|
QUOTE(bengkai @ Feb 26 2013, 07:02 PM) WOW ... impressive macro photos, I wish I could afford the lens. you can buy raynox attach on you kitlens or old manual macro lens at lesser cost to enjoy macro photography..so far I haven't come across ET for m43.
|
|
|
|
|
|
kenary820
|
Feb 28 2013, 12:30 PM
|
|
QUOTE(subrok007 @ Feb 27 2013, 10:18 PM) frens, we have another brand to invest loh.... http://www.tamron.com/en/news/2013/0129.htmldefinately good news, hopefully the come out with uwa and shorter zoom but still missing focus distance indicator which is very useful without tge evf.
|
|
|
|
|
|
kenary820
|
Feb 28 2013, 12:44 PM
|
|
QUOTE(bengkai @ Feb 28 2013, 08:40 AM) Kenary - i was considering the raynox but in the opted to buy the Olympus 12-50mm lens as it has a macro capability though not on 1:1. Will the raynox give a better macro shot? depend on what you plan too shoot and where you plan to bring your foot. for butterfly thats more thn enough. for smaller subject such as spider you might consider longer lens. I have raynox 250 which need very close distance, i think less than obe feet. if you thinking buying 40-150mm I might suggest getting raynox 150. All I can say 40-150 + raynox250 you can get more magnification than using macro lens like 100mm on crop sensor. My advice buy the raynox 150 or 250, learn how to use then decide later if you need longer lens. I think you can ge 40-150 used around rm350-500. The next thing you need to consider is your lighting..but dat something to discuss later till you get your raynox and share your test shot hehe..Goodluck.
|
|
|
|
|