Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Micro Four Thirds (m43) User Thread V5, Panasonic & Olympus Mirrorless System!

views
     
kenary820
post Jan 21 2013, 07:43 AM

~(**)~
******
Senior Member
1,862 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
QUOTE(sevenor @ Jan 21 2013, 01:22 AM)
I think focus peaking is over-hyped. I had used Sony NEX cameras (which have focus peaking function) before and found that you won't be able to tell for sure whether the colours have peaked already or not. I prefer to use the magnification feature (provided you don't set it to higher than x5 because anything higher the image will be very shaky and be of no use either). Just my dua sen worth.  biggrin.gif
*
thanks for your advice..can post video of demo? some of us are noobie, sometimes cannot imagine what being discussed especially on the MF lens. thanks.

ps: i'm courious about focus peeking on MF how its done.
kenary820
post Jan 25 2013, 06:38 PM

~(**)~
******
Senior Member
1,862 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
weekend spam...

user posted image
Walk-in-woods by m.s.@.n., on Flickr
kenary820
post Jan 26 2013, 05:31 PM

~(**)~
******
Senior Member
1,862 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
QUOTE(ecjl @ Jan 26 2013, 01:06 PM)
Looks blur, bro...
*
it just a handheld snapshot, but i like the lines dat why i shared..the blur mostly the moving leaves. neway i think its natural jungle path created by the water stream (that dried) at Mulu National Park. Cheers.
kenary820
post Jan 26 2013, 05:38 PM

~(**)~
******
Senior Member
1,862 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
thinks of buying cctv lens f1.4 isit worth trying? even though it consider cheap, i don't want buying somethg that might just sit on drybox. hope some member here can share some experienced using this lens. thx.

p/s: now i only have f2.8 max
kenary820
post Feb 3 2013, 11:43 PM

~(**)~
******
Senior Member
1,862 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
weekend spam..stitch from 4 photo with the 14mm

user posted image
Nature by m.s.@.n., on Flickr
kenary820
post Feb 8 2013, 08:05 AM

~(**)~
******
Senior Member
1,862 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
QUOTE(Jason @ Feb 3 2013, 05:57 AM)
EPM-2 w/kit lens. Haven't taken pictures with a proper camera in the last 10 years...Kit lens is also pretty piss poor..IMO. Quickly learned that I need a smaller lens, and a faster lens as well. Panny 14mm and 25mm here I come.

Auto ISO always selects 1600 zzz. Too aggressive IMO.

user posted image
Long Shan Temple by ixeo, on Flickr

user posted image
Fishes by ixeo, on Flickr

user posted image
Taipei 101 by ixeo, on Flickr
Critics, suggestions welcomed.
*
kitlens is ok..but i feel the pana have better build than the oly..if you love to do landscape i would suggest to get a uwa..i like uwa for landscape cos of the distortion..the only downside m43 uwa is so damn xpensive compare to dslr version..the other option is fisheye like samyang..however imho the uwa is versatile compared to fisheye..
kenary820
post Feb 8 2013, 10:54 AM

~(**)~
******
Senior Member
1,862 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
QUOTE(NISMOgan @ Feb 8 2013, 09:09 AM)
totally agreed with kenery.
*
hope tamron & sigma come out with line up..practically we are paying for precision glass and the build..but the glass on uwa is much smaller then the ff glass..think its a ripoff in the name of lightness hehe..
kenary820
post Feb 8 2013, 07:54 PM

~(**)~
******
Senior Member
1,862 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
QUOTE(Jason @ Feb 8 2013, 03:52 PM)
Agreed, the Panasonic 7-14mm is really good lens, and the pricing reflects that. Too rich for my blood! I don't use UWA so often. We need some competition from Sigma and Tamron to drive the price down.
*
tamron are known for making sharp lens for a low price..and sigma better build + coating. I would not hesitate pairing sigma 1020 on m43 for long exposure shot. wish the auto adaptor from kipon available now.
kenary820
post Feb 10 2013, 12:23 PM

~(**)~
******
Senior Member
1,862 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
Weekend spam..cannot afford uwa, alternatively 4 photo stitch to make a panorama.

user posted image
Sungai Sarawak by m.s.@.n., on Flickr
kenary820
post Feb 12 2013, 07:42 AM

~(**)~
******
Senior Member
1,862 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
I'm impress what 14mm can do. The wide & short focus characteristic do handy. Just photo of cat at home.

user posted image
Little kitty..meoooww by m.s.@.n., on Flickr

user posted image
Little kitty..again by m.s.@.n., on Flickr


kenary820
post Feb 19 2013, 07:58 AM

~(**)~
******
Senior Member
1,862 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
QUOTE(pakutekan @ Feb 19 2013, 04:00 AM)
now considering to get used pen E-pl1 with 14-42mm lens + underwater casing (i want to used for scuba) for rm1800.. is it ok?
*
why dont consider pns like sony rx100. some quote better DR. anyway are you looking forward to expand your lens and maybe add light for your underwater setup. I guess that what are the things to consider. Is 1442 meet your criteria. Check on flickr if any underwater photo that you like taken with oly +1442. If yes go for it, everything else more or less about skills + composition.
kenary820
post Feb 20 2013, 08:43 PM

~(**)~
******
Senior Member
1,862 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
hi guys,

considering to get samyang 8mm. may i know where can get the adapter and standard price..thx.
kenary820
post Feb 20 2013, 09:27 PM

~(**)~
******
Senior Member
1,862 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
QUOTE(NISMOgan @ Feb 20 2013, 09:23 PM)
i`m not an expert at all but I feel your flash are too much?
arent the samyang 8mm for m43? why you wanna get an adapter? or you are planning to get a non m43?
*
ya since its manual lens i'm thinking wanna use it for both canon and gx1. 2 bird one stone smile.gif
kenary820
post Feb 20 2013, 09:28 PM

~(**)~
******
Senior Member
1,862 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
oya samyang 7.5mm for m43
kenary820
post Feb 24 2013, 06:31 AM

~(**)~
******
Senior Member
1,862 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
QUOTE(tcm7782 @ Feb 24 2013, 01:27 AM)
no flash use
user posted image
P1130174 by tcm7782, on Flickr

user posted image
P1130175 by tcm7782, on Flickr

user posted image
P1130177 by tcm7782, on Flickr

user posted image
P1130189 by tcm7782, on Flickr

user posted image
P1130194 by tcm7782, on Flickr

user posted image
P1130195 by tcm7782, on Flickr
*
Beautifully done even on natural light..bro tcm maybe can go somewhere like butterfly park if any since your setup doesnt involve speedlight + diffuser..just suggetion smile.gif
kenary820
post Feb 26 2013, 12:03 AM

~(**)~
******
Senior Member
1,862 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
Any m43 member here attached the camera to digiscope?
kenary820
post Feb 26 2013, 12:06 AM

~(**)~
******
Senior Member
1,862 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
most recent

user posted image
3 panorama series #3 by m.s.@.n., on Flickr

user posted image
3 panorama series #2 by m.s.@.n., on Flickr

user posted image
3 panorama series #1 by m.s.@.n., on Flickr
kenary820
post Feb 27 2013, 03:12 PM

~(**)~
******
Senior Member
1,862 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
QUOTE(bengkai @ Feb 26 2013, 07:02 PM)
WOW ... impressive macro photos, I wish I could afford the lens.
*
you can buy raynox attach on you kitlens or old manual macro lens at lesser cost to enjoy macro photography..so far I haven't come across ET for m43.
kenary820
post Feb 28 2013, 12:30 PM

~(**)~
******
Senior Member
1,862 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
QUOTE(subrok007 @ Feb 27 2013, 10:18 PM)
frens, we have another brand to invest loh....

http://www.tamron.com/en/news/2013/0129.html
*
definately good news, hopefully the come out with uwa and shorter zoom but still missing focus distance indicator which is very useful without tge evf.
kenary820
post Feb 28 2013, 12:44 PM

~(**)~
******
Senior Member
1,862 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
QUOTE(bengkai @ Feb 28 2013, 08:40 AM)
Kenary - i was considering the raynox but in the opted to buy the Olympus 12-50mm lens as it has a macro capability though not on 1:1. Will the raynox give a better macro shot?
*
depend on what you plan too shoot and where you plan to bring your foot. for butterfly thats more thn enough. for smaller subject such as spider you might consider longer lens. I have raynox 250 which need very close distance, i think less than obe feet. if you thinking buying 40-150mm I might suggest getting raynox 150. All I can say 40-150 + raynox250 you can get more magnification than using macro lens like 100mm on crop sensor. My advice buy the raynox 150 or 250, learn how to use then decide later if you need longer lens. I think you can ge 40-150 used around rm350-500. The next thing you need to consider is your lighting..but dat something to discuss later till you get your raynox and share your test shot hehe..Goodluck.

4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0279sec    0.81    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 11:29 AM