..will gonna push hgher..
Lowyat.NET 3DMark TOP 20 [LOW-END], Strictly 4 Pipelines Only
Lowyat.NET 3DMark TOP 20 [LOW-END], Strictly 4 Pipelines Only
|
|
Feb 25 2006, 08:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,081 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 25 2006, 09:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,081 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
QUOTE(Shah81 @ Feb 25 2006, 08:44 PM) msi.. btw.. it seems these gc is highly oc'able.. i already forgot wat my core and mem clock.. i thinkd mem shud b 670mhz(ddr) and core forgot liao... now running stock bc.. jus to test my gc oc'able will try to push more... |
|
|
Feb 25 2006, 09:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,081 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
this is d latest one... 5466 for 3dmarks score.. using ngo modified driver 81.26, d rigz that im using is at my sig...
3dmark03 ![]() @Shah81, i buy it 2nd hand.. btw.. 128bit agpversion still got stock at cycom.. jus call them to confirm again.. This post has been edited by low yat 82: Feb 25 2006, 09:52 PM |
|
|
Feb 26 2006, 03:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,081 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
@siauann,
i believe our gc is great for oc... it even can use 450 core clock.. but artifacts start to come out... will try bump up one step agp volt...see can settle d prob or not... but d main prob is, this gc cant monitor temp... |
|
|
Mar 3 2006, 03:53 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,081 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
|
|
|
Mar 6 2006, 11:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,081 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
okie.. will try it later
edited: my score for 05... kinda sucky though.... i belief for ati is better in 3d marks 05... u can see it clearly at d first test... d rest two other test is more likely d same... using d same rigz but d clock > core clock 435mhz, memory clock 700mhz.. ![]() 3d marks 05 @ siauann, wow... how u can clock ur memory clock so high one... This post has been edited by low yat 82: Mar 7 2006, 03:30 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 31 2006, 08:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,081 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
update for my 3dmarks 03
5828..... using same rigz as below my sig and using forceware 84.20.. 3dmark03 ![]() |
|
|
Apr 1 2006, 05:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,081 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
@tAmp0i,
u forgot to update my link for 3dmark03.. @najmods nice score there... i think ur gc is same standard wit cyclone87 coz his gc also ddr3 but wit 4pipelines onli... mayb this time we can see another chart topper?? go gog gogog!!! edited: psuh harder ur cpu and also d gc... jus lil bit more to go for d top!!! This post has been edited by low yat 82: Apr 1 2006, 05:54 PM |
|
|
Apr 22 2006, 01:27 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,081 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
QUOTE(low yat 82 @ Mar 6 2006, 11:15 PM) okie.. will try it later bro... u still dun update muh score for 3dmarks 05 edited: my score for 05... kinda sucky though.... i belief for ati is better in 3d marks 05... u can see it clearly at d first test... d rest two other test is more likely d same... using d same rigz but d clock > core clock 435mhz, memory clock 700mhz.. ![]() 3d marks 05 @ siauann, wow... how u can clock ur memory clock so high one... |
|
|
Apr 22 2006, 01:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,081 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
@Shah81
but... i think shud use d ori... coz d not ori can change setting... btw, d 3d marks program can dl... |
|
|
Apr 23 2006, 03:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,081 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
QUOTE(nelza_ax @ Apr 23 2006, 03:26 PM) i think many people not vry sure how to post it... orb link u can post it using this way... http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopi...dpost&p=6050747 This post has been edited by low yat 82: Apr 23 2006, 03:43 PM |
|
|
Apr 23 2006, 11:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,081 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
QUOTE(swhung @ Apr 23 2006, 07:43 PM) any 6200 owners willing to post their 3dmark06 benchies here...? dissapointed d word that i can use... http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=274605&hl=interested in how it performs since 6200 supports sm3 and 3dmark06 do have tests for sm3... QUOTE Futuremark设法把NVidia 6200划分为SM2.0显卡,并不是因为6200不具备SM3.0的处理能力,而仅是因为6200缺乏某个可选的SM3.0特性,Futuremark 就武断的做出该决定。这样一来被定义为SM2.0的6200在得分评估时就不用经过一些深奥的SM3.0特性运算 It say that 6200 is capable of SM3.0 but just there is some missing selectable option characteristics of SM3.0 in 6200, thus Futuremark dont put SM3 beachmark on 6200. But according to the article, many people argue for such decision made by Futuremark. http://www.itdoor.net/pages/86,35031,1,1137743081.html This post has been edited by low yat 82: Apr 23 2006, 11:24 PM |
|
|
Apr 28 2006, 07:18 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,081 posts Joined: Aug 2005 |
QUOTE(swhung @ Apr 27 2006, 08:20 PM) awww... almost bought the 6200... i guess i'll have to go straight to 6600 if i want another budget card... btw, thi s not d correct place to discuss.. hey wait, how bout softmod the 6200?? can it handle sm3 after softmodding? 6200 128bit onli can b softmod.. and depends on ur luck... 6200 onli can handle sm3 after flash bios( not all gc is capable to b detected wit 6600)... |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0231sec
0.24
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 08:51 PM |