To eligible for the Top 20 list, you must have the following:
1) Futuremark ORB Compare Link
2) Details of your Benched System
3) Screenshot of your score (optional)
4) Only one score per user

* The reason why a Futuremark Compare Link is a prerequisite is to verify the validty of the score, not some photochopped screenies.

Also as suggested by some forumers in the previous thread, a Lowyat.NET 3DMark Team can be set up. so when you post your results on Futuremark, use the following format for your name. For eg, bwan would use:


Example of posting layout :
3DMark2001SE
1. 23177 - tAmp0i / Radeon X1300 Pro 256MB, Catalyst 5.12 / Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 @ 2940MHz
2. 20027 - Cyclone87 / GeForce 6200 128MB, Detonator 80.40 / AMD Sempron S754 @ 2700MHz
3. 18288 - embuhnator / Radeon 9550 128MB / AMD Athlon64 S754 @ 2746MHz
4. 18284 - floppy / GeForce FX 5700 Ultra 128MB, Detonator 61.77 / Pentium 4 @ 3516MHz
5. 17777 - zt_lee / Radeon 9500 128MB, Catalyst 4.12 / Pentium 4 @ 3601MHz
6. 17654 - ethanlow / GeForce FX 5700 Ultra 128MB, Detonator 66.93 / AMD Athlon64 S754 @ 2241MHz
7. 17516 - amd_scooterist / GeForce 6200 128MB, Detonator 81.95 / Pentium 4 @ 4009MHz
8. 17502 - ychwang / Radeon 9800 SE 128MB, Catalyst 4.11 / Pentium 4 @ 3760MHz
9. 17461 - wanek / GeForce4 Ti 4600 128MB, Detonator 44.03 / AMD Athlon @ 2706MHz
10. 16836 - neuvas / Radeon 9800 SE 128MB, Catalyst 4.5 / Pentium 4 @ 3618MHz
11. 16422 - alvarez_ / GeForce4 Ti 4200 128MB, Detonator 44.03 / AMD Athlon @ 2706MHz
12. 16399 - almostthere / Radeon 9600 XT 128MB, Catalyst 4.12 / AMD Athlon @ 2536MHz
13. 16220 - Hyde`fK / GeForce4 Ti 4600 128MB, Detonator 44.03 / AMD Athlon @ 2426MHz
14. 15666 - stalkerrox / Radeon 9800 SE 128MB, Catalyst 4.11 / AMD Athlon @ 2205MHz
15. 15505 - nelza_ax / GeForce 6200 128MB / Pentium 4 @ 3937MHz
16. 15483 - Dreamworks / Radeon 9600 XT 128MB, Catalyst 5.5 / Pentium 4 @ 2992MHz
17. 15458 - barclaycard07 / Radeon 9600 XT 128MB, Catalyst 5.8 / Pentium 4 @ 3645MHz
18. 15234 - chan1314 / Radeon 9550 256MB / AMD Sempron S462 @ 2004MHz
19. 15122 - CHICANOS / Radeon 9600 XT 128MB, Catalyst 4.11 / AMD Athlon @ 2205MHz
20. 14917 - Takashi / Radeon 9550 XT 128MB, Catalyst 4.10 / Pentium 4 @ 3817MHz


3DMark03
1. 8308 - kvmcom / GeForce 6600 LE 128MB : 602/1102, Detonator 84.66 / Pentium D @ 4110MHz
2. 7702 - Cyclone87 / GeForce 6200 128MB : 595/1050, Detonator 80.40 / AMD Sempron S754 @ 2700MHz
3. 7555 - Najmods / GeForce 6200 128MB : 573/1224, Detonator 84.21 / AMD Sempron S754 @ 1900MHz
4. 7453 - soulfly / GeForce 7300GT 128MB : 500/1400 (4-pipeline mod), ForceWare 91.31 / AMD Athlon64 AM2 @ 2646MHz
5. 6999 - tAmp0i / Radeon X1300 Pro 256MB : 650/414, Catalyst 5.12 / AMD Opteron 146 @ 2800MHz
6. 6820 - amd_scooterist / GeForce 6200 128MB : 500/800, Detonator 81.95 / Pentium 4 @ 4009MHz
7. 6650 - thefryingfox / GeForce 6200 128MB / AMD Athlon S462 @ 2339MHz
8. 5828 - low yat 82 / GeForce 6200 128MB : 460/715, Detonator 84.20 / AMD Sempron S754 @ 2402MHz
9. 5718 - nelza_ax / GeForce 6200 128MB : 461/671 / Pentium 4 @ 3937MHz
10. 5268 - siauann / GeForce 6200 128MB : 450/652, Detonator 81.95 / Pentium 4 @ 2395MHz
11. 5252 - fillet / GeForce 6200 128MB : 460/660, Detonator 84.21 / AMD Athlon @ 2191MHz
12. 5160 - gigaleon / GeForce 6200 128MB / AMD Athlon64 S939 @ ??MHz
13. 5142 - embuhnator / Radeon 9550 128MB : 615/324, Catalyst 5.3 / AMD Athlon64 S754 @ 2700MHz
14. 5049 - davidletterboyz / GeForce 6200 128MB : 442/616, Detonator 77.62 / AMD Athlon @ 2286MHz
15. 5025 - almostthere / Radeon 9600 XT 128MB : 614/400, Catalyst 4.12 / AMD Athlon @ 2536MHz
16. 4838 - Shah81 / Radeon 9550GT 256MB : 635/290, Catalyst 5.12 / Pentium 4 @ 3258MHz
17. 4775 - evilguy / GeForce FX 5700 Ultra 128MB : 610/1118, Detonator 84.21 / Pentium 4 @ 3007MHz
18. 4766 - mADmAN / Radeon 9550 256MB : 547/412, Catalyst 5.9 / AMD Athlon64 S754 @ 1980MHz
19. 4725 - CHICANOS / Radeon 9600 XT 128MB : 601/405, Catalyst 4.11 / AMD Athlon S462 @ 2205MHz
20. 4714 - barclaycard07 / Radeon 9600 XT 128MB : 540/333, Catalyst 5.8 / Pentium 4 @ 3645MHz


3DMark05
1. 3250 - tAmp0i / Radeon X1300 Pro 256MB : 650/414, Catalyst 5.12 / AMD Opteron 146 @ 2900MHz
2. 3194 - Najmods / GeForce 6200 128MB : 576/1215, Detonator 84.21 / AMD Sempron S754 @ 1900MHz
3. 3173 - Cyclone87 / GeForce 6200 128MB : 595/1050, Detonator 80.40 / AMD Sempron S754 @ 2700MHz
4. 2398 - Shah81 / Radeon 9550GT 256MB : 635/290, Catalyst 5.12 / Pentium 4 @ 3258MHz
5. 2363 - mADmAN / Radeon 9550 256MB : 567/425, Catalyst 5.10 / AMD Athlon64 S754 @ 2268MHz
6. 2305 - computer idiot / Radeon 9600XT 128MB : 535/370, Catalyst 6.1 / Pentium 4 @ 3039MHz
7. 2280 - embuhnator / Radeon 9550 128MB : 621/330, Catalyst 5.3 / AMD Athlon64 S754 @ 2520MHz
8. 2237 - chan1314 / Radeon 9550 128MB : 525/399 / AMD Sempron S754@ 2004MHz
9. 2228 - barclaycard07 / Radeon 9600 XT 128MB : 540/333, Catalyst 5.8 / Pentium 4 @ 3645MHz
10. 2145 - siauann / GeForce 6200 128MB : 450/752, Detonator 81.95 / Pentium 4 @ 2395MHz
11. 2090 - low yat 82 / GeForce 6200 128MB : 435/700 / AMD Sempron S754 @ 2403MHz
12. 2049 - nelza_ax / GeForce 6200 128MB : 461/671 / Pentium 4 @ 3937MHz
13. 2045 - bumicomp / Radeon 9550 256MB : 486/313, Catalyst 6.3 / Pentium 4 @ 2857MHz
14. 1994 - wtm0325 / Radeon X550 128MB : 465/610, Catalyst 5.11 / AMD Sempron S754 @ 2427MHz
15. 1941 - malayneum / Radeon 9550 XT 128MB : 475/350, Catalyst 6.5 / AMD Athlon S462 @ 2005MHz
16. 1940 - CHICANOS / Radeon 9600 XT 128MB : 600/401, Catalyst 4.11 / AMD Athlon S462 @ 2270MHz
17. 1887 - ffrulz / Radeon 9550 128MB : 410/500, Catalyst 5.12 / AMD Athlon64 S939 @ 2399MHz
18. 1878 - merzchan / Radeon 9600 XT 128MB : 526/324, Catalyst 5.5 / Pentium 4 @ 2406MHz
19. 1823 - Izzairi / GeForce 7300GS 256MB : 550/530 / AMD Athlon64 AM2 @ 2255MHz
20. 1777 - swhung / Radeon 9550 256MB : 401/252, Catalyst 6.3 / Pentium 4 @ 2735MHz


3DMark06
1. 1256 - kvmcom / GeForce 6600 LE 128MB : 425/1101, Detonator 84.66 / Pentium D @ 4106MHz
2. 681 - mADmAN / Radeon 9550 256MB : 567/418, Catalyst 5.12 / AMD Athlon64 S754 @ 2275MHz
2. 573 - wtm0325 / Radeon X550 128MB : 465/610, Catalyst 5.11 / AMD Sempron S754 @ 2382MHz
3. 495 - swhung / Radeon 9550 256MB : 401/252, Catalyst 6.3 / Pentium 4 @ 2738MHz

This post has been edited by tAmp0i: Aug 12 2006, 02:25 PM

updated - thx.

This post has been edited by goldfries: Jan 4 2006, 04:38 PM

participate in 3dmark03
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=4503573

AMD Sempron64 2500+ (7x200 @ 7x345) 1.44v
Abit NV8 (Bios ID 1.1 @ 3:2 Ram Divider)
Infineon BE-5 1GB DDR400 (2.5-3-2-8 1T @ 2.8v)
Sapphire 128MB x550 (400/500 @ 465/610)
Samsung S1604PN (160GB 7200RPM 2MB ATA133)
Acbel iPower 400w (Active PFC)

here is mine
going to oc like crazy when i change the cooler
any nice cooler to recommend for nvidia gfos 6200 ?

proc at 2.3ghz(athlon xp)
ram at 2.5/3/4/8
vga core 470/memory 660

This post has been edited by thefryingfox: Jan 16 2006, 08:19 PM


Attached thumbnail(s)

ORB link is much more preferable.... Thanks

anyone can help me upload? i saved the file but somehow my 3dmark is already *cracked* and orb dont let me add my results

anyway here is the latest score i get
i got the file which i saved earlier


Attached thumbnail(s)

re-download 3dmark from futuremark and just run it as free version la dude.

Delete the key in regedit and re-ran 3DMark, submit the score after that

MUAHAHAHAHHAHHAHA....... lemme be the first...i know its pathetic but then again why should us 'poor' people be left out? wonder how the 6200s will fare?

3DMark06

screenshot


specs in siggy at @2277Mhz, 567/418.5

3dmark05

P42.8C @ 3039MHz
9600XT 128MB @ 535/370
catalyst 6.1

the link somehow show that my gc is 256MB???

This post has been edited by computer idiot: Jan 20 2006, 07:16 PM


Attached thumbnail(s)

eeerrr.....new 3dm05 score

3DMark05 ORB and screenie


specs as in siggy @ 2268mhz

This post has been edited by mADmAN: Jan 21 2006, 12:30 AM

here's my score:

3dmark03: 4838 pts ORB LINK

3dmark05: 2398 pts ORB LINK

3dmark06: still testing - upload later


System Spec:

P4 2.4A @ 3.2GHz
256x2 Corsair VS 2-3-3-6
Gecube 9550GT 634/290 voltmoded(vgpu: 1.6 / vmem: 2.65)

@shah81

W00T!!!

@tampoi
my 3dm05 score and ORB is still at 2299 bro... latest one is 2363

and my card in the 06 scores is 256mb..not 128

This post has been edited by mADmAN: Jan 22 2006, 12:25 AM

Sorry guys.... So, it is advisable to provide additional information on your benchmark system specification

Fixed

3dnark06 lol
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=75897

How to do print screen on windows XP?? i'm so noob... i cant post my result in project ORB...

theres a 'print screen' button on ur keyboard. press ctrl+print screen.

then open up ms paint and press ctrl+v. then save as jpg.

here's mine....manage to crank up a few steps..
3d Mark 03
3d Mark 05

im using system shown at my sig to benchmark...no oc done to my system as im using intel mobo... guess my score can b better if i can oc my system or using a newer rig..

This post has been edited by siauann: Feb 18 2006, 01:46 AM


Attached thumbnail(s)

ur 03 link is invalid... publish the project first and edit the link

wat do u mean invalid? cant open? hw come i can open? anyway i reedit it once again..

Post your score something like.... "http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06="

ok..now can see....and invalid means cannot open because u didnt publish ur project....

my score can b seen nw??

wait a minute...... i clicked on ur link and i saw MY score instead... did u publish ur project or not?





click on the project manager on the top left and make sure the check boxes are checked for ur score. it will give u a compare URL. thats the URL to use when posting it here.

u need to do it for BOTH 03 n 05.. coz i clicked on both and got MY scores...

This post has been edited by mADmAN: Feb 17 2006, 06:28 PM

guess it shd b able to see it nw...

eh? why ur 05 only 2042? should be able to get either higher or on par with mine leh... urs is 6200 128bit man... push the card somemore.... ur max clocks for 03 may not be ur max clocks for 05....give it a try man

yeah..i was wondering oso...onli manage to get 2042...but wif same clock i get 52++ for 03...i'll try push higher...

damn....got to get myself a 6200 and voltmod it . 6200 is now the king of budget cards

haha....volt mod?? not all 6200 are king...onli the 128bit without tc version can call king....hehe

here's my latest score for 3d Mark 05 ... a very little increment only....
i jz cant seems to push higher..the score cant go higher..izit bottleneck by my rig?? plz help.....

This post has been edited by siauann: Feb 20 2006, 07:52 PM

here mine... 3d marks 03

..will gonna push hgher..

what brand of card are you using?? what are your core & mem clocks?? btw nice score

msi.. btw.. it seems these gc is highly oc'able.. i already forgot wat my core and mem clock.. i thinkd mem shud b 670mhz(ddr) and core forgot liao... now running stock bc.. jus to test my gc oc'able

will try to push more...

where did you buy your card because now 128bit card is hard to find. most shops are selling 64bit versions.

edit: oopppsss..out of topic here, sorry mod. wont do it again.

This post has been edited by Shah81: Feb 25 2006, 09:22 PM

this is d latest one... 5466 for 3dmarks score.. using ngo modified driver 81.26, d rigz that im using is at my sig...



3dmark03






@Shah81,
i buy it 2nd hand.. btw.. 128bit agpversion still got stock at cycom.. jus call them to confirm again..

This post has been edited by low yat 82: Feb 25 2006, 09:52 PM

nice score u hv thr....happy using 6200....
a little better thn mine////

This post has been edited by siauann: Feb 26 2006, 01:36 AM

@siauann,
i believe our gc is great for oc... it even can use 450 core clock.. but artifacts start to come out... will try bump up one step agp volt...see can settle d prob or not... but d main prob is, this gc cant monitor temp...

I using a 6200 softmod to 8 pipeline... can the result post in this thread. thanks.

karising..... cannot...

if u read the first post it clearly states maximum of 4 pipes only...

if u wan 8 pipes ur gonna have to go to the mid range section

i think can coz one of d forummer also using softmod to score very high at 3dmarks03...

@lowyat82
can u try ur score for 05? i kinda get low score wif 6200 on 05..

okie.. will try it later btw, i saw that d GT4 - Mother Nature test i score lower than u.... why leh?


edited:

my score for 05... kinda sucky though.... i belief for ati is better in 3d marks 05... u can see it clearly at d first test... d rest two other test is more likely d same...

using d same rigz but d clock > core clock 435mhz, memory clock 700mhz..




3d marks 05


@ siauann,
wow... how u can clock ur memory clock so high one... in 3dmark03 cannot meh?

This post has been edited by low yat 82: Mar 7 2006, 03:30 PM

Omg!..just saw Cyclone's score for his 6200. Damn scary man on par with 6600 already!

update for my 3dmarks 03
5828.....


using same rigz as below my sig and using forceware 84.20..
3dmark03

Heres my uber 6600LE, flashed with 6600GT BIOS but it still have 4 pipes


3DMark06 1589
ORB http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=211208

I will return with 05 and 03 score.....hehehe

This post has been edited by Najmods: Apr 1 2006, 07:30 AM

In order to participate in the league, i suggest everyone to run 3DMark06 at only default resolution

no wonder laa that his marks are high....he's using 1024x768 resolution

My monitor didnt support 1280x1024

3DMark05 3080
ORB http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1911112

@tAmp0i,
u forgot to update my link for 3dmark03..

@najmods
nice score there... i think ur gc is same standard wit cyclone87 coz his gc also ddr3 but wit 4pipelines onli... mayb this time we can see another chart topper?? go gog gogog!!!


edited: psuh harder ur cpu and also d gc... jus lil bit more to go for d top!!!

This post has been edited by low yat 82: Apr 1 2006, 05:54 PM

Ive done it!
3DMark05 3194
ORB http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1924326
Pic

Whoops, sorry my bad

We got new topper. Congrats Naj, now top both 3DMark2001 and 03

Thx Probably I cant beat both 3Dmark03 and 01 since Im CPU limited but I,ll try....

The best 03 so far
3DMark03 7407
ORB http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=4714073
Thats probably because of the CPU limited
I,ll try more if I have time,but thats all for now.....

wow....your card is nice. where did you buy that card??

I buy it from Mines IT City for RM455 but curiously I only paid RM405! The shopkeeper didnt know how to count money . I buy it 4 months ago....

Oh new score:
3DMark03 7555
ORB http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=4714137
Clock 573/1224MHz (576MHz core not stable )

am i qualify for 3dmark05?

i scored 1777 3dmark points.
specs in my siggy
orb link....
here it goes http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1952790

any other thing else?

This post has been edited by swhung: Apr 13 2006, 11:58 PM

how to submit to official web? dun hav internet connection at home ...

btw..dis is my score



This post has been edited by nelza_ax: Apr 14 2006, 08:21 PM

Here's mine

3DMark 05 : 2045 | ORB Link

System:
Pentium 4 2.8 Northwood @2.845 Ghz
Abit IS-7E
1GB TA Modules DDR400 RAM
Gecube 9550 Extreme Platinum Edition [486/313] Catalyst 6.3
Maxtor 40GB Hard Disk
'capalang 500w' PSU

This post has been edited by bumicomp: Apr 16 2006, 10:56 PM

Scores up-to-date....

thanks for updating the scores...

First , welcome those people come to my thread....
Second , If I Open At Wrong Section , moderator please kindly remove/delete it

This Is The Spec Of My PC

AMD AlthonXP 1800+ (133x11.5 , palomino core) din't oc
MSI K7N2 Delta-L (NForce2 Ultra400 Chipset)
Kingston 256MB DDR400 Value Ram (din't got 2 x ram to run dual channel T.T)
Creative Radeon 9550XT(128MB,128bit , 464/608)(windows detected it as 9600XT)
Samsung 20GB 5400 RPM Hard Drive (ATA100)

Microsoft Windows XP SP2
ATI Catalyst 6.14
3D Mark 2001SE Build330

Setting = 1024x768 32bit
Score = 10522

Are This Score Normal ?

Oh Ya ! My GC Default Speed Is 400/600
i can succesfully oc it until 500/700 , but ...after oc to tat speed , me can't succesfully run 3dmark , why T.T?

And i tried to oc my cpu , default is 133x11.5
i tried to oc 13X x 11.5 , after that ....my pc sure always hang lolx !!!
hows come T.T?

my cpu not really hot as well (after oc to 140 x 11.5) .....idle = 4X Celcius , processing = 5X Celcius
aren't my cpu no really good for oc ? (cos using palomino core)



Thank You......

This post has been edited by 3536837: Apr 21 2006, 09:53 AM

Quite Normal especially for the AGP Card in Use..............

9550XT normaly is got the score...

thats normal for 9550xt, but u should try to use 3dmark03, cause your card is directx9 not directx8.

anything hangs after overclocking means that the hardware setting is not stable

overclocking doesnt mean anything if it's not stable to run at least a few light applications.

to know how to overclock the right way, kindly read the pinned threads about Fundamental of Overclocking

Honestly....your processor is too slow. Take a barton OC it to 2.2-2.4ghz..you will get around 13-14k for your 9550XT.

Your score is low cause you are CPU limited. 3dmark01se is CPU dependent. My Winchester @ 2.4 with 9550 @ 400/500 could get 14k.

bro... u still dun update muh score for 3dmarks 05

can put my score up also ar? im using a 6200 clocked at 300/500. here is the screenie. is the info enough? if not i can do it again


This post has been edited by Yapmy: Apr 22 2006, 01:38 AM

@Yapmy

i believe your card have been softmod 8 pipeline because there is no way a 4 pipe 6200 at 300/500 to get that kind of score. so you are not allowed to post your score here. please refer to the first post.

Strictly 4-pipelines card (and below) only!


@tAmp0i

have the rules been changed? refering to the first post, it is compulsory to include an ORB link for your score to be verified. but lately i've seen people posting results only with screenies.

This post has been edited by Shah81: Apr 22 2006, 01:59 AM

ok...i thought this thread doesnt include softmodding

This post has been edited by Yapmy: Apr 22 2006, 03:09 AM

It is compulsory to include a link but if that is the case, the table would be quite empty and why not wait for other's to post up their results too....

Maybe a screenie of Rivatuner and a valid ORB link would help?

And i need suggestion here, would it be necessary to delete non ORB link results....?

This post has been edited by tAmp0i: Apr 22 2006, 11:30 AM

nah...just leave it laa. i find most people use an *ahem* version of 3dmark and they would have problems to upload the scores. so maybe u can accept screenies.

but make sure you check the scores throughly though. as you can see, some people came here to see what others are able to achive with their cards. so let say someone posted a score with a softmoded 6200 and get some ubber score. then someone else came here with a normal 6200 use that as a reference. he may think that there is something wrong with his/her card because there is no way that he can get the same score with same setup. (look at Yapmy score, thats a softmoded 6200. a normal 6200 have to be OCed to around 450/700 to get that kind of score.) "sorry Yapmy. this is just an example "

so the conclusion is you can use screenie but you have to be more cautious when accepting them. maybe they need to include system spec with screenies for reference.

example:

@Shah81

but... i think shud use d ori... coz d not ori can change setting... btw, d 3d marks program can dl...

my 3dmark is *ahem* already..im not sure if i can post an orb link. but the rest is not a problem la

ya...i know you can download it for free. but most people will search for *ahem* serial number so that they can change the benchmark settings. with the original free version, you cannot change any settings.

would like to participate in 3dmark06...
got only 495 marks

pc specs in my siggy...

orb link : http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=259087

screenshot below..


Attached thumbnail(s)

imho....i think from now on the rules should be...

1) Futuremark ORB Compare Link (aka only ORI free version, non*ahem* version, so cannot change settings)
2) Details of your Benched System
3) Screenshot of your score together with a screenshot of RivaTuner - in ONE screen (to ensure theres not more than 4 pipes for unlockable cards) COMPULSORY
4) Only one score per user

as for the currect scores...leave it alone ler... unless u find a valid one that can replace it.

The ahem 3d mark also no problem ma...just leave the settings like the free version la. how come only the free one can?

As long as the free version is working, why cra*k it? Just wait until it finish there you'll have the score....

screenshots can be photoshopped.....

exactly! which, if i remember correctly, is exactly the reason why they started with the ORB link rule.

so u know that the free version works....so why bother cra*king it?