I'm really grateful SIII comes with a hyperglaze glossy finish. See what would happen it were to be matte


Source

Still back to plastic whether they like it or not. I'm afraid the One X might actually become pebble blue
Imagine what would happen to SIII

I'll feed you more



Full article here: Closer Look And Hands-On With The Samsung Galaxy S III - Already The Most Interesting Phone Of The Year So Far, And We're Only Just Scratching The Surface

I doubt it.. Maybe mediascanner will be a bit longer though

I believe all active forumers here knew that

We'll have to see how the scratch resistant hyperglaze claimed by Samsung stands then. Mind you it's not scratch PROOF

You can always limit data consumption in ICS. There's a feature for that

Later you two will be poisoned by Galaxy Note 2

Going for AOSP custom rom is like a downgrade for SIII, lesser features, and not to mention the possible bugs. It's just like a normal SII if one is to put AOSP on SIII

it's from the person's blue jeans to be exact. Well, we don't have to worry that for SIII

This post has been edited by ken2291: May 10 2012, 01:20 PM

btw just wanna ask.. since the phone comes with such a huge storage, how do we know which file is corrupted? Is there a way to check?

Got it, thanks! I thought you're here for the previous reason again

oh wait, I mean to stuff it in smartphones with a smaller screen

True, but it is able to integrate with 3rd party apps which Siri is not capable off. That might be an edge. I still feel awkward talking to my phone , maybe others will do so (eg. cooking/driving while telling the phone to do sth)

same goes to LCD. I even doubt we'll be using 8hours SCREEN ON time per day

I think you need more understanding on how technology works

Great!! Finally a video after the "cold" a few days ago
Next time they should set the phone to maximum brightness

OLED Myths and Misunderstandings
Nuff said

This post has been edited by ken2291: May 11 2012, 10:09 AM

the blue tint has shorter lifespan than the red and green pixel. Which is why the bluish tint on AMOLED display as the blue tint will get lesser/weaker throughout the lifetime of the AMOLED display.
But all this AMOLED degradation is not sth to worry about because
1. Manufacturers are constantly improving it to compensate for that
2. We'll change our phones before the lifetime actually ends (way way longer).

This post has been edited by ken2291: May 11 2012, 10:31 AM

True. Unless that person is playing with his phone throughout his 8hrs of work

Something to read here for those who are bored:
Hype, expectation and the Samsung Galaxy S III

This post has been edited by ken2291: May 11 2012, 10:37 AM

Another video. Not in english though

Nice review over there. Like how it explains the build material for those ppl
They even went ahead writing the LITI production process

Additional read here in case someone is interested:
Super AMOLED Plus resolution - further details
LITI Laser-induced thermal imaging process suggest high resolution OLEDs in Q2 2012

This post has been edited by ken2291: May 11 2012, 11:33 PM

No worries. People here are all helpful

Samsung's SHV-E170K is a mid-range Galaxy S III variant for Korea Telecom
Look much like the previous Weber Shandwick leak

This post has been edited by ken2291: May 11 2012, 11:57 PM

GSMArena's comparison:
Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III vs. HTC One X: Alien vs. Predator

Quite a lousy comparison for some areas if you ask me
I LOL the moment I see Beats Audio as an advantage for One X over SIII

This post has been edited by ken2291: May 12 2012, 08:59 AM

Then you must have missed the first page

Take a look at this picture, it shows the displays of SIII and One X under a microscope:


You'll notice the following:
1. SIII's Pentile display has a RGBG pixel arrangement (Red-Green-Blue-Green)
2. One X's display has a RGB pixel arrangement (Red-Green-Blue)

On the Pentile screen, each green sub-pixel shares a red and blue sub-pixel with another green sub-pixel.
This makes it having lower pixel density compared to the SLCD2 in One X.

Regarding the brightness, since LCDs do not produce light themselves, they require a backlight.
Amoleds on the other hand require no backlight as each pixel produces its own light.
LCDs have backlight on even when displaying black colour but the pixel in Amoleds just switches off, hence the deep black. This results in higher brightness/nits in LCDs displays.

I could be wrong here, correct me in case there're mistakes, especially on the brightness which I'm not so sure


She's so lucky

Yeah, looks like the energy-efficient Exynos and extra battery capacity really play a big part here. Especially during video playback

This post has been edited by ken2291: May 12 2012, 11:28 AM