Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 The Weight Loss Thread v3, Ask your weight loss questions here.

views
     
shadowz
post Oct 28 2012, 09:42 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Somewhere in Msia >.< I might b lost. I cant tell~


QUOTE(WiLeKiyO @ Oct 28 2012, 12:15 AM)
Currently I am helping/motivating my gf to loss her weight, so I brought a pair of 2.5kg for her. But she refuses to use it because she afraid gain some muscles mass that causes her arm looks big.

As I know female is hardly to gain muscle. How should I tell her that dumbbells workout is really a fat burning exercise ? She does not believe me anyway. sad.gif
*
It is a fat burning exercise. And your right, women have a VERY hard time gaining muscle. Honestly, the number of gals soooooo perasan that they are somehow going to be special and have the ability to gain huge muscle sooooo fast is ridiculous. A woman JUST starting to weight lift (the first 6 months of serious weight lifting is when a person has the greatest ability to gain the most muscle in the shortest amount of time), IF she weight lift SERIOUSLY (definitely more than 2.5kg dumbbells... rclxub.gif ) will be considered talented and naturally gifted to gain even 0.5kg a month. It is f***ing hard work.

However, if she doesnt want to weight lift, it is completely possible to lose weight with a great diet in place. Figure out how many calories she burns a day - figure out how much her macros should be (no diet should have 0g of fat,carb or protein) then plan a sensible diet around it. Educate her about the importance of maintaining her current muscle mass by consuming the necessary protein and a little weight training (no need weights oso-just use own body weight).

If not, the scale will say she meet goal but the mirror will show her saggy undefined body failed to meet her goal. And what more important-what the mirror says or what the stupid scale says? sweat.gif
shadowz
post Nov 8 2012, 07:24 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Somewhere in Msia >.< I might b lost. I cant tell~


QUOTE(TechnoG @ Nov 8 2012, 06:27 PM)
that's what I'm trying to highlight, is there any scientific proof for this? Muscle itself would not breakdown when there is insufficient energy. muscle itself isn't a energy provider at the very first place.
*
shocking.gif Yes there is scientific proof. Read up and educate yourself before spreading dangerous advice please.

Muscle is broken down if your caloric deficit is too large for too long because your body cannot maintain it. Muscles are greedy - they need calories and nutrients to be maintained. Even with 'enough' protein, it can still be diminished as your body is unable to meet its demands.

Not to mention, fat mass is crap for supplying your body with necessary glucose and amino acids if broken down ESPECIALLY if you are conducting high intensity workouts like weight training or serious cardio. So if your body is not getting it from your diet then where do you think it is going to suck it out off? Your muscles.

That said, if you are a very unique human being that is able to thrive and stay big and muscular on a diet of 1000 calories a day and what is insufficient nutrients for the rest of us - then congratulations! thumbup.gif

Just don't go around telling others that such a thing will work for them shakehead.gif
shadowz
post Nov 9 2012, 06:35 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Somewhere in Msia >.< I might b lost. I cant tell~


QUOTE(TechnoG @ Nov 8 2012, 09:17 PM)
umm, proof? instead of talking why not just post it down here.

first of all, muscles are made up of amino blocks(protein), water and some glucose. I agree on the nutrients part, but then calories? what does calories have to do with muscle maintenance? Say fats are high in cal, so I eat loads of them to maintain my muscle?
and our body do keep extra amino acids, thats why if you dunk on tons of protein, you'll get fat. Obviously you dont use fat to supply the body with glucose and amino acids, cos fat is fat..it is for energy purposes. fat > carbs in terms of energy value. But I'm not saying one should not totally weaned off from carbs.

and yes, I did mention it was for short term..unless you are anorexic.
*
Eh Excuse me ah. I will have you know I am aware of why proteins are constantly insisted on being essential (thus me mentioning amino acids) so please refrain from speaking to me like I have not been intelligent enough to have acquired such information.

Your body has LIMITED amounts of Amino acids, and CONSTANT need for. While it can go through brief fasted periods and thrive, after days and days it has to get it somewhere - SEE: Muslim Weight Lifters after fasting month: they always experience a loss in muscle mass due to decreased food intake even with continued training.

If your body has LIMITED amino acids and it NEEDS MORE then the only source it has to leech it from are your muscles! The severity of it depends on several factors such as size of deficit, bodyfat, newbie lifter, etc but the fact remains if you starve the body (Which you will unless you are a 3 foot midget who ISNT weight training) it will take what it can from sources available to them.

And yes I know you mentioned limited but thats still a matter of opinion - you mean 2 days? Have at it. You probably mean 2-3 months though to cut (unless you cut only 1 kg)

By all means, eat 1000 calories and train to maintain your muscle. I conceded that ypou can do whatever the heck you want.

But again I repeat DONT go spouting your nonsense just because it works for your unique body to everyone. It wont work for them.

There was a 2009 study done at Rockefeller University and there are numerous reports from people who have lifted longer than you or I have lifted (or even lived)

http://www.pacifichealthlabs.com/blog/can-...-crash-dieting/

Diets that have smaller daily caloric deficits (300-500 calories) shed fat while preserving lean body mass.

http://www.pacifichealthlabs.com/blog/coul...not-to-do-that/

But in subjects who severely reduced their daily caloric intake, fat represented 48% of the total weight loss and muscle 42%.

https://s3.amazonaws.com/media.nobullbodybu...lose_muscle.pdf

One of the major factors mentioned in the research was the severity of the calorie
deficit:
“Very aggressive calorie deficits and very low calorie diets tend to erode lean body
mass to a great degree than more conservative deficits.”


http://www.simplyshredded.com/layne-norton...tting-diet.html

The severity of your calorie deficit will, to a large extent, determine how much muscle you retain/lose.
Short periods of high severity dieting (more than 1000 kcals per day below maintenance level) are not too muscle wasting, but prolonging them for more than a few days will certainly cause one to lose a good deal of muscle.


P/S: GOOGLE GOOGLE GOOGLE

whistling.gif Who is the one posting without proof? Now you post proof of research showing you eat below BMR and lose less than 5-10% LBM icon_idea.gif Back yourself up if you insist on spreading the word.

This post has been edited by shadowz: Nov 9 2012, 10:01 AM
shadowz
post Nov 25 2012, 11:22 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Somewhere in Msia >.< I might b lost. I cant tell~


QUOTE(alien9 @ Nov 24 2012, 01:36 AM)
Cardio is so overated for fat loss tbh
*
Indeed. rolleyes.gif Nvm. Let all the cardio crazies work their bodies to the oh so desirable skinny-fat physique. It will just ensure we all look better rclxms.gif icon_rolleyes.gif
shadowz
post Nov 25 2012, 03:09 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Somewhere in Msia >.< I might b lost. I cant tell~


QUOTE(McMafia @ Nov 25 2012, 12:48 PM)
Hi, I have briefly read through this thread, and have learned that proper weight loss need cardio + muscle building.
So I'd like to ask for opinion, currently I'm a 29y/o male, 173cm, 78.6kg, my aim is to reduce to 70kg
I intend to do some muscle building for higher BMR, not so much intention on the bulky muscular look though. Just started for swimming for around 2 weeks

So based on the siggy from alien9, my BMR is 1797kCal, at the moment I swim 5 times per week, each time 2km in one hour, and TDEE would be 1797*1.55=2785
So for weight loss so I aim at 80% of TDEE, with daily calorie intake of 2228?

My weekday diet:
Breakfast: Milo+Milk+Oat = 440kCal
Lunch: Usu only drink milk = 160kCal
Dinner: Mixed rice (1 vege, 2 portions of tofu, rice), not sure how much kCal, + Nescafe 3 in 1 87kCal
Supper sometimes will take 3-4 pieces of cookies

Weekend diet:
Brunch: instant mee around 400kCal, coffee 190kcal, egg white usu from 4 eggs
Afternoon sometimes milk 160kCal
Dinner type not fixed, sometimes Nasi goreng+ayam pandan+drink, sometimes others, I let myself eating freely on weekends as long as portion is not too large/overeating
So my diet calorie intake at the moment is too low? need to add more calorie intake in the form of protein? please advice.

Regarding muscle building, there is no nearby gym for me to go. So is it feasible to do this by using dumbbell? So my training regime would be cut down on swimming and
spending time on dumbbell?

Thanks in advance for advice and enlightenment  smile.gif
*
~2200 calorie intake sounds right. You will lose weight with your swimming and weight training (assuming the dumbbells are heavy enough). I suggest incorporating body weight exercises like pushups, dips, pullups, lunges, etc. If you really can't get to a gym and your dumbbells don't challenge you anymore, you can stuff a bag full of books to add 5-10 kg weights to carry around for resistance training.

Your diet... Figure out how many calories your eating because farting around is a waste of time. Protein intake looks pathetic and personally it looks like there is some empty calories like cookies, milo, nescafe, etc. Replacing those calories with milk, eggs, nuts will be more beneficial nutrient wise and bumping up protein intake. If you're serious about maintaining and building some muscle mass you should aim for roughly 150 grams a day.

G'luck.
shadowz
post Nov 27 2012, 06:40 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Somewhere in Msia >.< I might b lost. I cant tell~


QUOTE(driftmeister @ Nov 27 2012, 06:14 PM)
sorry to ask. if cardio is overrated for fat loss, then what is rated good for fat loss?

weight training? that's all?

I know diet is utmost important though..
*

You answered your own question. laugh.gif

Exercise wise - Combination of weight training and cardio has been proven to ensure 90+% of weight loss is actual fat. Many people actually lose NO lean body mass and some genetically fortunate newbie weight trainers can put on muscle.

Hours of cardio is unnecessary and counter productive because it is catabolic when you overtrain (which many people unwittingly do thinking they are maximizing fat loss) and research has shown roughly half of weight loss from pure cardio is lean body mass loss. This results in lower BMR thus forcing them to further restrict calorie intake making it harder to have energy to exercise, rinse repeat. You see the problem.

A good diet (or even a shitty diet to be honest) with a decent calorie deficit will ensure you lose weight, coupled with weight training & cardio - you should look good too. Food is your fuel though so the quality of what gives your fuel (it provides you with energy) makes a difference in how you feel.

This post has been edited by shadowz: Nov 27 2012, 06:40 PM
shadowz
post Nov 27 2012, 10:03 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Somewhere in Msia >.< I might b lost. I cant tell~


QUOTE(driftmeister @ Nov 27 2012, 09:08 PM)
great. so if i want to slim down + a bit of shape up. (I am not fat, it's just the belly.. >< 26y.o., 175cm, 78kg)

Do I need to do a calorie deficit? or remain my calorie intake? (Have been doing long slow running for past 5 months, manage to pass down 3-4kgs and then it stops)

I usually take about 1600cal daily...
*
Ummm I calculated your BMR and the result is if you are a girl 1600 is right there. If your a guy you are actually eating 234 BELOW your BMR (For a guy of your age, weight & height is it 1834).

Either way, if you really are eating that little and going about everyday life and exercising daily - you are probably stalling any weight loss because your body is trying to hold on to every bit of fat reserve it can. It is our body's defence mechanism when it thinks we might be going through a period of food shortage. Not to say you will never lose weight again, it just is very difficult when you are not working with your body.

I don't know your Macros so I cannot comment, all I can say is you can do 1 of 2 things:
1) Lower your calories to ridiculously low amount under 1000 calories a day and lose weight but it will be bad for your health and energy plus you will lose more lbm.
OR
2) Up your calories to 1800-2000 a day, try to optimize your macros for energy and muscle maintenance, and maybe cutting back your running to 2-3times a week.

I highly highly highly highly recommend incorporating weight training. You may not see a drop on the scale but as weeks pass by your body re-composition will prove to increase the attractiveness of your physique, up your metabolism and (I cannot promise how quickly) you will lose the belly fat as you lose body fat all over.
shadowz
post Nov 28 2012, 11:01 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Somewhere in Msia >.< I might b lost. I cant tell~


QUOTE(driftmeister @ Nov 28 2012, 12:07 AM)
ima guy tongue.gif i've been mislead to do calory deficit, that's why i am taking in 1600cal >< will definitely need to take in more, at least for some lean muscle

what are macros? measurement?

2) my running are 3 times per week, 2 on weekdays, 1 on sundays

i think i might want to hit the gym soon for weight trainings, hopefully improvement can be seen over time
*
rolleyes.gif No offense but unless you are 10 years old without the ability to find things out yourself (hey look! A computer with internet access!) - it is your own fault for simply listening to other people telling you what to do.

Macros is an abbreviation of Macro Nutrients. There are 3. In no particular order:
1)Protein
2)Fat
3)Carbohydrates

Now...EDUCATE YOURSELF:
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.p...21703981&page=1

That will explain calories and macros. Figure out what works for you.

QUOTE(alien9 @ Nov 28 2012, 10:42 AM)
You are trying to lose weight with lots of high glycemic carb?

With all that rice in your diet, you think that your glucose is low? Sigh
*
I was thinking that too doh.gif I look at his diet and it is just too... ARGH shakehead.gif Aihs.
shadowz
post Nov 28 2012, 12:51 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Somewhere in Msia >.< I might b lost. I cant tell~


QUOTE(leaF @ Nov 28 2012, 02:02 AM)
I think I am having same problem with you now. 78kg and very hard to reduce it anymore. Calories deficit not working anymore. I been maintaining 1500kcal per day as well with calories deficit around 100-250kcal per days.Already one month and unfortunately the body fat on my stomach didnt go away and my weight still the same .

My diet

*breakfast - skip

*lunch - kfc chicken breast and most of the time I skip the skin part

or anything high in protein (chicken rice (normal big rice) with chicken breast part only

or economy rice - tauhu, curry chicken breast , vege )
#roughly 500-600kcal
*dinner - home cooking (protein - 60% rice/vege/carbo - 30% fat - 10%)
# roughly 300-400 kcal
*supper - nasi lemak ayam dada (nasi kecik)  or ayam tandoori with naan
#roughly400-600kcal (not often eat supper)

most of the time my drink is plain water or green tea. Fruit is either apple , orange , pear , grapes ..only one kind per day to stock up my glucose.

Correct me if I am wrong .  notworthy.gif
*
QUOTE(leaF @ Nov 28 2012, 12:20 PM)
Maximum is 2 bowl rice intake per day..according to ur theory calories in < calories out will still resulting in lose of weight..I only take one fruit per day..
Mind tell me what's wrong?I am experimenting with this Malaysian diet..managed to lose weight when i was in uk ..uk diet is mich better than here
*
Indeed, calories in<calories out will result in weight loss but how efficiently you lose the weight is another matter.

The statement of eating a piece of fruit to replenish your glucose level is quite frankly laughable and shows us that you do not understand what you said.

Keeping it short: Your diet sucks and your math sucks too.

You say your only drinking water and tea so all your calories come from food.

You skip breakfast and only SOMETIMES eat supper. That means you most often only eat 2 meals a day which amount to MAYBE 1000 calories.

How on earth can you say you maintain 1500 calories a day (which if you did is still too little assuming you are a man)?

There is not enough information for me to offer specific solid advice that hasn't already been given:
Figure out your calories needs
Create a REASONABLE deficit
Apparently you need to learn to COUNT calories properly
Weight train and SOME cardio (depends on your goals)
Rest enough

Your body should cooperate so long as you dont have a medical condition or previous eating disorders, etc.

Oh and your excuse about UK diet being better is bull. Their diet can be as shitty or as good as the individual chooses. You sit there and tell me deep fried fish & chips is healthier than tandoori chicken and naan... then I cannot say anything. doh.gif
shadowz
post Nov 28 2012, 01:28 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Somewhere in Msia >.< I might b lost. I cant tell~


QUOTE(whatdamn @ Nov 28 2012, 01:11 PM)
sounds like an awesome post-workout meal!  drool.gif
*
laugh.gif Yeah but want to find good fish and chips that is comparable to UK is practically impossible. Either way I have cut down on my consumption of deep fried foods because I find if I eat too much my stomach gives me issues and too many studies showing scary links to medical problems sad.gif I used to eat deep fried chicken everyday... sweat.gif
shadowz
post Nov 28 2012, 01:40 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Somewhere in Msia >.< I might b lost. I cant tell~


QUOTE(whatdamn @ Nov 28 2012, 01:34 PM)
back home if i'm craving for fish and chips, i usually head to fish & co and order a few plates of their fish & chips. i'll be good to go after that. kills the craving for some time.

i think you're over thinking it though. something unhealthy once every 6 months or every quarter of the year wouldn't kill you. smile.gif

you have to remember that western diets are REALLY unhealthy as in they consume a lot of tv/microwave dinners and 'lunch-to-go' sort of meals. this would usually be in the form of sandwiches made with deli meats and cheese and such or the greasiest cheeseburger you could imagine. doesn't help that their idea of 'chinese food' is chow mien, friend rice, fried poh piah...basically anything fried and swimming in plum sauce.
*
I find fish & co okay only. Damn spoiled laugh.gif I was considering trying a place at Bukit Bintang my friend told me about tho so will see if it is better.

tongue.gif You misread. I said cut down. Not eliminated. I have deep fried chicken(I love McD's fried chicken~) probably twice a month. I just can't eat the stuff everyday cuz I feel quite sick after a few days and I realized it's the excess oil... We love our deep fried karipaps, keropok lekor, chicken, etc. sweat.gif

Oh yea - alot of westeners eat rubbish. I laughed when my partner brought me to a 'great chinese' place. It was so far off... I mean I know Malaysian Chinese food also not 100% authentic but seriously closer than the Americans idea. wink.gif

*Now I feel like getting keropok lekor and karipap laugh.gif Time to see if the auntie got some more downstairs..

This post has been edited by shadowz: Nov 28 2012, 01:41 PM
shadowz
post Nov 28 2012, 03:40 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Somewhere in Msia >.< I might b lost. I cant tell~


QUOTE(leaF @ Nov 28 2012, 02:34 PM)
In UK I tend to cook and get to choose the ingredient by myself. Back in Malaysia everything looks so good and nice to eat.

I know I shouldn't try out with diet that lower than my BMR but my weight is not going down for this past 2 months even though I already started this diet 2 months ago. Just that I am curious to prove that calories in < calories out  = lose weight theory.
I know my diet in UK is not the best but it gives me a better looking body than last time .

I thought sugar content in an orange is enough for a day usage . I am not working and most of the time I just sit in front pc. Having 1500 calories per day is not a problem as long I never starve myself. I will eat when I am hungry.
*
That is where self-discipline comes into play.

In any case if that is how you have been eating in the UK and then Malaysia for months (if not years) then I am going to guess that you have f*cked up your metabolism and probably have low LBM.

The amounts you are quoting here are barely 1000 calories (UK and Malaysia). Stop insisting you are maintaining 1500 calories in Malaysia when you claim to hardly go out to supper-the fact is most days you MAYBE reach 1000 calories.

I can only go by what information you have given me but if it is correct then you have trained your body to be VERY efficient at using a low amount of calories.

You can correct it by eating a high protein diet and adding exercise over time but at the moment if you continue not exercising it is obvious that you aren't going to be able to lose weight unless you ate little to nothing.

As for "thought sugar content in an orange is enough for a day usage". doh.gif You don't need sugar for a days usage. You need energy, energy from food we call calories, the most quick acting macro to give energy is carbohydrates, carbs are what your body can most efficiently derive glucose from. The only good thing about you eating the fruit is the nutrients you got from it. You eat plenty of rice from the looks of it thus claiming the fruit is your source of glucose for the day shows your ignorance.

You have ALREADY starved your body for gosh knows how long thus the issue you face now. Hunger doesn't mean you are not getting enough to fuel your body just as fullness does not mean you have provided your body with enough.

Honestly, you probably aren't going to shift the weight anytime soon unless you get off your backside and exercise. That, and eat properly.

Read up, learn, understand what is going on inside your body instead of pissing about guessing what may or may not work.

P/S:If you read up and studied how your body works, you will realize many are beginning to realize that a low-carb diet (any variation) that encourages glycogen depletion which signals to your body the need to use its energy reserves (especially if you maintain a reasonable calorie intake) we oh so lovingly hold on to as fat. There is a reason why many bodybuilders maintain a very low carb diet when they are cutting body fat.

Good luck.

This post has been edited by shadowz: Nov 28 2012, 08:46 PM
shadowz
post Dec 7 2012, 12:22 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Somewhere in Msia >.< I might b lost. I cant tell~


QUOTE(c4non @ Dec 7 2012, 11:42 AM)
Hello guys....

I need some advice...i wanna lose ard 5-8kgs

I have no problems with my tummy part just my lower part of my body...

Its hard for me to buy jeans sad.gif

My fren said to me i have like JLo shape but i really dont like...
*
? Well there is no such thing as spot reduction. So as you lose fat, it will come from everywhere. You may get the shape you want but you may end up looking more gaunt on your upper body. Its individual and depends alot on your genetic disposition on where you are meant to store fat (Like hispanics and black women carry ALOT of fat in their booty whereas other European women have the fat spread more proportionately). I have a friend who is very slim but she has quite abit of fat on her cheeks so she looks very child like. Other people may be over weight but it doesn't show much on their face, etc. Hard to predict.

Anyways, first step is I advise you to get your body fat % so you know how much fat you have to lose - then you can work more effectively towards your goal. You may want to lose 8 kg but if you can only lose 4kg of fat then the other 4 will be sacrificed from muscle mass which is bad for you in the long run. You can google 'women bosy fat % and find articles and images showing the different levels of body fat % and get an idea of what you want to aim for. Like I personally want to achieve 17% but in the long run I expect I will maintain best at 19-20%. Others have different preferences.

Then you should figure out your BMR and TDEE (Google please - the are many calculators and many articles explaining the importance) so you know your calorie needs. From there you can decide on a reasonable deficit to shed the fat. Diet is top priority, exercise is highly recommended but for all intents and purposes not necessary for weight loss. It is necessary for health and a nice body shape though.
shadowz
post Dec 7 2012, 04:20 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Somewhere in Msia >.< I might b lost. I cant tell~


QUOTE(c4non @ Dec 7 2012, 03:46 PM)
Yeah...i do agree with u about the genetic thing...

Nothing much i can do about it...sad.gif

I will try to check my body fats...

As i know the more we work out...

Our muscle will gain weight rite?

Now i do more walking than jogging...

Because i am the type who lazy to work out...

Haha! tongue.gif i sked that if i work out evryday then one day i stop the possibility that i will gain weight is high tongue.gif
*
Your statement about muscles makes no sense.

Your muscle cannot gain weight.

IF you were to weight train HARD then you have the chance to gain muscle that adds to your weight but ONLY if you eat at a caloric SURPLUS. Very very very few individuals in the world actually gain muscle at a deficit and that is ONLY because they are newbie weight lifters and they are VERY overweight to begin with. Seeing as you are have less than 10kg to lose and plan to eat less calories, it is only probable that you maintain your muscle mass (this is important).

Contrary to what the majority thinks, it is ALOT of F***ing work to gain even a kg of muscle-it takes good nutrition, hard training and lots of rest. Some people struggle for several months to a year to gain as few as 3-4 kg of muscle.

I suggest you don't worry about it.

It is a much quicker and easier process to lose fat than to gain muscle.

Ummm no. The only way you gain weight, specifically FAT (this is important- not all weight gain is fat. There is natural fluctuations, bone density increase/decrease, fat gain/loss & muscle gain/loss) is by eating tooooooo many calories.

Thats it. You do not magically gain fat from eating an extra plate or rice. You don't gain it specifically from fried foods. You don't gain fat from a slice of cake. It is the sum of calories you consume.

The importance of not eating junk is that real whole foods offer nutrition that processed junk/fast food does not. So health wise, eating good food and eliminating junk/fast food is important. In terms of weight loss-it ultimately comes down to calories.

So in theory if you decided one day to stop exercising, then all you need to do to maintain your weight is eat ONLY how many calories you need as a sedentary person.

This is why finding out your BMR and TDEE is important. From there you can make meal plans to fit into your daily caloric budget.

Don't let anyone tell you walking or jogging is not good enough to lose weight. It is a cheap, easy, sustainable and healthy form of exercise. It burns calories to help you reach a reasonable deficit and improves your heart health. I also love how you can do it anywhere and how you wont burn out doing it - there is no point doing intense exercise but quit after a week. Do something you enjoy and do it always. Keep it up.

I suggest you add weight training. It will help you sculpt your body so it looks strong and healthy rather than flat and skinny as well as offers many health benefits. If you prefer looking very slim with no toned muscles though, I guess you don't need to worry about it. Attractive physique is very personal preference.
shadowz
post Dec 8 2012, 08:09 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Somewhere in Msia >.< I might b lost. I cant tell~


QUOTE(bizness @ Dec 8 2012, 04:31 PM)
First of all, I really do appreciate your time in replying my post

I have taken note for the changes you made or added in for me.

Normally at the Gym, I will start the treadmill with 2 mins warm-up (Speed : 5mph) then will start to run for 3 mins (Speed : 8mph) and followed by a cool down for 2min (Speed : 5mph). Is this the right way to use the treadmill for fat loss? Should I do it like this or run at a constant speed with very short interval rest for an hour? Really need some advice on this part here.

For the bench press, I normally do 10kg as I heard doing light weights on bench press make you loose those fat? Is it true? And I will normally do 18 reps for the first set and drop 2 reps for each of the following sets.

For the sits up, is it really pointless? How do I loose my upper and lower tummy without doing sit ups?; and other exercise can be used? Gonna give your recommended gym routine a try.

Also not to forget is my diet plan appropriate in terms of protein, carbs intake?

Many thanks in advance sir  notworthy.gif
*
You warming up on the treadmill like that is fine. For weight loss... *shrugs* You are burning less than 50 calories is your only on the treadmill for 7 minutes and at such slow speeds. Are you confusing your warm up with HIIT? Because you are NOT going to dramatically lose weight by walking 7 minutes.

Dude.... what rubbish are you doing as a bench press? shocking.gif

ONLY ONE THING LOSES WEIGHT: Burning MORE CALORIES than you CONSUME. Diet is your number one priority when you want to cut fat.

The reason weight training is essential is that you build your strength, you sculpt your physique, you have the potential to build muscle (which burns 10-20 times more calories than the same amount of fat) and it expends energy (meaning you burn calories doing it) too. So STOP bench pressing 10kg and get srious about training.

LIFT HEAVY. LIFT HEAVY OR GO HOME.

Seriously. If you want to prance about like a delicate lily and lift light weights that make me cringe, stay home.

Yes sit ups are pointless to lose tummy fat. doh.gif The only way to lose fat is lose it. You rbody will decrease your fat from everywhere. Spot reduction is a myth. What situps, planks, and other core exercises do is strengthen and build core muscles.

Muscles you wont see unless the fat is gone. The fat is only gone if you lose fat from everywhere.

Read the link I gave you about estimating (unless you go take specific expensive tests to accurately measure how many calories you burn a day, everything is estimates - expect to tweak numbers on your own for best results) your calories a day AND figure your macros out.

http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.p...21703981&page=1

Seriosuly dude. Cover the basics and don't buy into the bro-science spread based on nothing. Find out the science behind what works in our bodies.
shadowz
post Dec 8 2012, 10:38 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Somewhere in Msia >.< I might b lost. I cant tell~


QUOTE(bizness @ Dec 8 2012, 10:22 PM)
Thanks for the reply shadowz, really appreciate it.

I think I did not make the treadmill part really clear, sorry about that. What I meant was doing 3min @ high speed and 2 min @ low speed for an hour.

Yeah, I got to agree on your statement above. Will start to get to lift up those heavier weights as recommended by whatdamn too. Hmm, so now I just got to focus on getting those fat off by burning more calories.

Thanks for the link, will go through it and yeah, I really do need to cover those basics biggrin.gif

Many Thanks smile.gif
*
Oh good! Phew! I was so confused why you thought 7 minutes on the treadmill can be weight loss tool tongue.gif

In that case, yes you can use the 1 hour treadmill walk as a calorie burning exercise that will effectively help in weight loss. Since your speeds are rather low, you can opt to do it everyday but NEVER BEFORE weight training. Personally, if you can do it on days you are not weight training it will probably be better. But if you must have faster results, do it everyday, no problem with muscle loss but again - do it only AFTER weight training. Just remember not to burn out... It is easy to get tired and fatigued and ditch your exercise efforts altogether... Avoid this.

Good man! I think you will agree after just 2-4 weeks of lifting heavy that it works great to shape your body nod.gif I highly suggest reading the stickie in this forum written by darklight outlining a simple (and effective!) beginners routine you can easily use for 6 months before tweaking or changing up. However, any routine to make to follow that has squats, deadlift & benchpress is good to start with.

Your welcome. I hope you enjoy the reading smile.gif


Added on December 8, 2012, 10:42 pmAh my bad - the stickie in the Bodybuilding Forum tongue.gif

This post has been edited by shadowz: Dec 8 2012, 10:42 PM
shadowz
post Dec 15 2012, 12:41 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Somewhere in Msia >.< I might b lost. I cant tell~


QUOTE(hazman1677 @ Dec 14 2012, 07:27 PM)
Hello people,

I am new here. Just registered about 5 minutes ago. Hope to benefit a lot from the Low Yat forum.

I am now trying to lose weight here. I am currently 85kg at 165cm. My BMI is 31 and I have no idea what is my body fat percentage.

For the past 4 weeks, I have been jogging every morning for 5 times a week. I'll spend 50 minutes jogging every session. The problem is I have not seen any weight loss yet. I am eating lots of fruits and vegetables now and have been trying to avoid sugary drinks.

I have not done any weight training. Should I start doing them to accelerate my weight loss mission?

Hope to hear some good feedbacks from you guys. Cheers
*
For a month and no progress? At that rate you should have at least seen 1-2 kg by now.

You mentioned that you have increased your fruits and vegetables as well as avoid sugary drinks and thats great! However, you can still be eating good foods and be eating too many calories. Thats the clincher when it comes to weight loss - your calorie intake. I suggest you start by figuring out your BMR and TDEE and then searching google for nutritional values of foods you eat everyday. If you eat something that has nutritional information on the packaging, check it to see what a serving is (you will be surprised by the weird serving amounts one packet gives sometimes) and how many calories it is. You are very likely subconsciously eating more as you have increased your exercise. If you have a smart phone - there are lots of apps you can use to help track your intake.

Eat at a caloric deficit of about 15-25% of your TDEE and you will see weight loss. At some point, you will want to look at your macro intake but for now, start learning the basics of calories and keeping track of them.

Weight training is HIGHLY recommended. Not necessarily because it accelerates your weight loss, but it will help you LOOK like you are accelerating it as maintaining you muscle mass will ensure any weight you are losing is 90+% fat rather than muscle and that will look much more attractive.

In the long run, it is excellent because by maintaining (or even increasing) you muscle mass, you ensure that your metabolism stays elevated and you wont have to suffer by continuously restricting your food and caloric intake. thumbup.gif This is why you sometimes see 2 people of the same size, but one can eat much more than the other and maintain their weight - it is very likely because they have more muscle thus burning more calories.

In SHORT - count your calories, it is almost definitely the problem. Seriously look into adding weight training to your regime - if you stick to it, you wont regret the results!
shadowz
post Dec 20 2012, 02:39 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Somewhere in Msia >.< I might b lost. I cant tell~


QUOTE(AhTeo @ Dec 20 2012, 01:11 PM)
Hi all!

What type of exercise can be done in home without any equipment to lose weight as I have no access to Gym?

Thanks!
*
There are loooooooots. My personal favourite home 'exercise' requires a partner though. And you have to have alot of stamina as the exercise can take several hours before both are satisfied with the results.

Heh.

In any case, if you don't have a partner, you could always do less time consuming exercises like jump rope, jumping jacks, walking/jogging around your housing area, dancing to fast paced music, bodyweight exercises like pushups, dips, pullups, planks, etc. Many many many options. The trick will be pushing yourself to do it intensely enough and staying motivated.

So I highly recommend finding an 'exercise' partner to 'workout' with at home. You will stay motivated to give your best and do it at a relatively intense pace most of the time. :-D

Good luck!

*This recommendation does not apply if you are underaged. whistling.gif
shadowz
post Feb 3 2013, 01:07 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Somewhere in Msia >.< I might b lost. I cant tell~


QUOTE(wannmetal @ Feb 3 2013, 07:20 AM)
thanks for ur feedback. what do u mean by holding on to fat? does it mean burn fats??
*
? Holding on to fat means your body IS NOT burning fat lah. You are signalling to your body that you are in a state of no food because you have restricted your calories to almost nothing (essentially you are killing yourself very very very very very slowly - see 'anorexia') - so it kicks into survival mode and tells your body to use as little energy as possible and to hold onto energy deposits (Fat) for as long as possible.

You WILL eventually lose WEIGHT but it is painful, you damage your internal functions in indescribable ways, it is mentally and emotional damaging as well which will affect your social life. Not to mention, you will later not be able to eat normal amount of calories because you have compromised your system.

Undoing the damage is even more ridiculously stressful.

Who the heck told you to eat like this to lose weight? Aih.

Eeeeeeeat food. Food you can CHEW and enjoy. Have a reasonable daily caloric deficit of 10-25%. Never eat less than your Basal Metabolic Rate. Drink water, tea, black coffee. Exercise 3-4 times a week (Not necessary).

Your fat will soon get pissed off at your healthy diet, pack their bags in the middle of the night and leave. tongue.gif Very slowly, they take ages to pack their damn bags. But eventually, they will be gone.

FYI - you are not meeting your protein needs with just a portion of whey protein. That's a ridiculous notion. doh.gif
shadowz
post Feb 5 2013, 05:03 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
510 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Somewhere in Msia >.< I might b lost. I cant tell~


QUOTE(wunanwarrior @ Feb 5 2013, 01:27 PM)
hi,i have problem to maintain my weight for some period..let me share my story.
2011-My weight is around 102kg.So,after getting advice from doctor,i started work out.It takes me around 6 months to get weight around 75kg.At this point,i started relax and skip my work out,and just 3-4 months,i gained back 10kg.
2012-I started work out back.And in 3 months,my weight drop until 65-68kg.I try to maintain it until August.Then i started working,no more work out,and i gaining back my weight.
2013-In January,my weight is around 78kg and when it keep increase until February,(I gain 2,3kg),i start work out.Currently i doing my work out after working hours.

So,my question here,why i gain some weight when im not doing work out even though im control my appetite.Is it true that some rumors said,once u start work out and get the result,u cannot skip the exercise or u will gain back the weight..i am jealous with some friends that can eating what ever they want and still maintain their weight.I am very sure i will manage to drop some weight,but to maintain it,i really need help..thanks.
*
Pffft. You can stop exercising and maintain your weight. The trick is finding out how many calories it is you should be consuming as a sedentary person. Many many many people lose and maintain weight without exercise. For all round health and longevity though, exercise should be incorporated in your life. Just sayin'.

Anyway there is no mystery lah. You consume more calories than you need, so you gain fat. Simple.

The amount of calories you need vary according to your age, gender, time of month, weight, height, muscle mass, genetics, etc. For the most part, calculators give a decent estimate but some self experimenting is necessary to determine your necessary daily calories & weight loss 'sweet spot'.

You obviously found that sweet spot with the exercise you were doing.

When you stopped exercising, you continue to eat 'normally' but without the extra activities to burn excess calories and create a caloric deficit... your body had excess it needed to store. So it got stored as fat.

Choose:
1) Severely restrict your calorie intake (that will have to be restricted every year you get older) and be a couch potato.
2) Exercise regularly, build muscle, keep your metabolism in good shape, and get to enjoy food.

Mind you, there are lots of minute details that can make weight loss easier/harder. But weight loss ultimately revolves around a very basic fact which is: Eat LESS calories than you BURN.

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0239sec    0.67    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 10:59 AM