QUOTE(Eventless @ Apr 5 2012, 08:30 PM)
You are contradicting yourself. If no one knows who the inventors are, how would you know that they exist? This is equivalent to saying nothing.
What aircrafts were around during the 1800's? The only known working aircrafts during those time were balloons and gliders. Given that the science behind those are well known, I don't see any point at looking at them for proof of anti-gravity. If you have something specific in mind, say it. Don't make others do your own work for you.
QUOTE(norther @ Apr 5 2012, 09:13 PM)
This example is based on several example of propulsion system from "The Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion." Page 152.
The flying craft would be moved forward by creating a gravity well or "gravity gradient". The craft, along with it's occupant, fall into the gravity well together, i.e. move forward together. To the passenger inside the craft there is no sense of falling and no sense of direction changes, no "G-Forces with straning faces of grunting passengers struggling to remain conscious by tightening the lower muscles of the body to retain blood in the brain. The craft can change direction instantly in sharp zipping turns and the passengers would not feel the changes of direction relative to the craft.
The "Gravity Well" is created through gradient differences by a charged ion field generated in front of the craft shown by +(plus) signs. The "Gravity Hill" is the dense jet of charged -(negative) ions thrust out behind the craft.
A gravity gradient is created between the negative hill and the positive well drawing the craft and occupants in the direction of the Gravity Well.
Nothing to do with the 1800s or airships.
Ion propulsion has been used by NASA since the 1960s. If there were anti-gravity effects, they would have detected it by now.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ion_thrusterGot this part is wrong. Missed the word "no" in front of the G-Forces. Sorry.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
QUOTE
To the passenger inside the craft there is no sense of falling and no sense of direction changes, no "G-Forces with straning faces of grunting passengers struggling to remain conscious by tightening the lower muscles of the body to retain blood in the brain.
Astronauts have no problem with dealing with the absence of gravity. Why would the people in your example have problems?
The problems and solution that's being described in your example are those faced by jet fighters pilots undergoing multiple Gs while doing aerobatic maneuvers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G_force#Vertical_axis_g-force
Did you even bother researching any of these examples on the internet?
This post has been edited by Eventless: Apr 5 2012, 10:54 PM