What facts? Given the lack of source of information, it isn't any different from work of fiction.

How exactly is Earth similar to Mars?

Let's see, how is Mars different from Earth? From the Mars wikipedia page I can list a few.

No atmosphere. That's pretty lethal to any known lifeforms.

The reason for Mars having no atmosphere, it is missing a magnetic field. This allows radiation from space to reach the surface. Another feature lethal to living things. They lost that about 4 billions years ago.

If your city is around 63 million years old, it would have been on a dead planet. Why not just go directly to Earth which is pretty much alive at that time? Even at 3.8 billions years ago, it would have been a dead planet due to the above events.

Which part of not life supporting are you not understanding? Why would anyone want to live on planet that does not support life? None of your story matches the history of Mars. Mars been dead long before any of your so called ruins on Mars came into existence.

You probably should keep of the Internet if you can't separate fact from fiction.

From the wikipedia entry for Cairo:

Based on the above meaning, the Mars that is being referred to is probably Mars, the Roman God of War. The planet Mars is named after him. So the link between Mars the planet and Cairo is not really relevant to your story.

Why would the arabic name of Cairo matter? The city has been around long before Islamic civilization existed.

This post has been edited by Eventless: Mar 21 2012, 08:20 PM

This is not a story telling forum. If you want to prove something, you need to provide the source of your theories. If you cannot do so, please do not post in this section of Lowyat.

It does not really matter what you are reading if the information that you are providing is wrong. What you feel does not matter. What you can prove does.

This post has been edited by Eventless: Mar 21 2012, 08:27 PM

I'm afraid that no one will understand what you trying to say since no one can read your mind. Throwing out a bunch of words that only you can understand isn't helping going to help anyone especially yourself. It just sounds like ranting of a mad man.

If you can't explain it, how do you expect other people to understand what you are trying to say?

Logic and fact are based on evidence. You have not shown any. None of your arguments are fact or logical.

History repeating itself and alternate history are not related to each other.

This makes no sense at all.

If this was true, why are there still so many conspiracy sites out there? Wouldn't they have been eliminated by now if this was true?

You are not following your own advice. You are focusing specifically on one side only without showing any proof that it is true.

In another word,you can't explain it yourself because you don't really understand what you are reading. If you propose something, it is your responsibility to justify it yourself.

You are not making sense. Words have meaning when used correctly.