construction defects during Defects Liability Period must use developer own funds lar..mana boleh use the maintenance funds...developer in turn will claims the defects rectification from the main contractor. if developer use maintenance fund money than your JMB sucks or the owners know nothing at all..lol

it is supposed to be use for upkeep and other improvement at the condo..btw Bayu sentul formed JMB yet anot?

Melati ehsan gonna have another new project in sentul, yoir efforts to expose such lame developer is very much appreciated.. hopefully those who interested can see this and reconsider their decision whether to deal with such mtfk developer or not.

Aiya.. I ady sienz with new completed projects. Sure got defect 1. Problem is they need to solve within 2 years or else need to do something with developer by reporting their irresponsibility... hopefully they will take it serious. Not cheap this project. . Some where 500k but size consider big la..

Good luck with Melati Ehsan... They never attended JMB meeting...or AGM

Bayu Sentul Type B 1363 sqft available for sale. High floor. Virgin condition.
Only 470k. Interested can PM me for more info. Tq.

One of the worst developers in sentul. 🙂

Kasi pm untuk jadi kaya.

I tot their launch price higher than that? Am interested with Bayu Sentul few years back but the price too high... Btw, since when u b agent?

Woah. How many properties that you have? Why you sell? Should keep.. bayu is a nice project.

Why u bashed this developed? Every co has their defect 1 and defect can't be avoided when a property just vp. Please be understood. Even 1mil property sure will have 1...
You have to understand the problem may not come from developer because they appointed main contractor to construct the building and the main contractor who has their obligation to appoint sub contractor such as lift, piling, sewerage, swimming pool, common facilities, GBI consultant, and other.
The problem come from sub contractor and the developer job is to solve and follow up with main contractor so that it will chase sub con to solve the defect issue.


This post has been edited by Endless_tale: May 4 2017, 01:25 AM

Yup. is below launching price.
not an authorized agent but I can do some consultant. haha.

Hmmm...most newlu completed poperties nw even landed same or even below launching

But the contract is between buyer and developer.

It's developer's responsibiiites to ensure deliverable. How it does it is no concern to buyer.

Yes.. Developer owns a duty to buyers that end project shall be delivered properly but anything wrong sure developer get blame first. My point is don't we just focus the blame on developer because they are not the person build the condo but they own a duty to follow up the defects with main con and sub con make it unless there is between subsidiaries relationship for developer and main contractor. So buyers must chase developer out before the defect liability period end or before developer release balance of retention payment to main contractor. Normally 2 years from the vp date.

This post has been edited by Endless_tale: May 4 2017, 11:48 AM

High floor real corner unit, unobstructed KLCC view in future, psf cheaper than pr1ma house, some of the block A owner feel like sell out their existing unit exchange this unit.

seem like u are part in this development. but never mind u did point our a good reason, developer not building it they just selling and it actually built by sub-contractor under main contractor.

Same scenario, main contractor blame too coz main con not built the condo they just manage the contact, who built it is sub-con, indon, bangala shouldnt hold main-con performance detention fund isit?

another thing why public blaming government, those stupid indecent, fraud, super delay and uncompleted project also not built by government they just approved the project? it built by sub-con, management by main-con and running by private delivery partner is it?

Developer accountable and responsible for end delivery product. Pull stop. Pushing away to subcon and maincon will not solve the issue and in fact will make your name looks even worse.

Sorry but if I buy from developer, I chase the developer. Simple as that.

How the developer works with its sub-contractors is none of my business.

You are correct that normal behaviour we will chase the develop and non of your business to interfere the sub con or etc. But I feel pity to those developer that got blame and maybe the first we need to blame is project department that didn't manage the sub con property and main con. Cheer.. get your defect settle asap and don't renovate your unit first. They have right not to serve your defect unit and blaming u back that your renovation consultant destroy your unit.

But the one laughing to the bank is the developer

Bro, you are changing the subject lah. Suddenly bring in renovation consultant? What talking you?

If you can't stick to topic for discussion, why even start?