Samsung Galaxy S II Official Thread V29, Welcome Ice Cream Sandwich!
Samsung Galaxy S II Official Thread V29, Welcome Ice Cream Sandwich!
|
|
Mar 14 2012, 07:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,943 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
i just tested chrome beta. it works great, no force close
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 15 2012, 08:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,943 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
QUOTE(reevephon @ Mar 15 2012, 07:34 PM) Hi guys, may I know is there any different between AP and original SME set besides the warranty policy? Is there any other different in terms of technical part? As I know AP set is not local set means it's from other country, so does it has any difficulty or changes when it comes to rooting or etc compare to the local SME set? Because I know that now non G version is only available from AP company but no longer from SME, so is it suggested to get the non G AP version or G SME version since both the price is not much different? Thanks in advance. there's no difference except for the warranty support. AP and SME set doesn't affect the rooting process. it's the model that matters, non g or g version. it's recommended to go for non g because it has less problems and there are tons of custom roms for it. i myself using non g AP set. so far, no problem. |
|
|
Mar 16 2012, 01:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,943 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
|
|
|
Mar 16 2012, 05:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,943 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
|
|
|
Mar 16 2012, 07:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,943 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
QUOTE(arslow @ Mar 16 2012, 06:54 PM) A lot of people are saying its pretty stable,thats why wanna try i reverted back to gb. kenot tahan already Got quite a number of people that flash the variety of LPQ ROM, they actually flaxh back to Paradoxx ROM lol,so abit itchy edi to flash this ROM. Another reason to run away from criskelo.The touch screen SENSITIVITY. OMG its like the touchscreen suddenly become cacat-ed edi @thelaptopdudeguy how u tahan the sensitivity ler, the way u say i tot its not TOO bad, but seriously its worst than bad i wanna scroll, but he keep on clicking pulak |
|
|
Mar 16 2012, 09:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,943 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 16 2012, 11:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,943 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
QUOTE(Augus7 @ Mar 16 2012, 11:34 PM) I dont really get it about baseband but before i installed MIUI, i was on ICS XXLPQ baseband. But when i refer to http://www.miui.com/a-123.html baseband is modem. you can use any basebandit shows to use the version XXKH1 instead. So im wondering which is more suitable for MIUI and does it make any difference. I don;t know if im paranoid or what, it seems that most of the time my line bar is at 2 out of 4. running i9100 |
|
|
Mar 16 2012, 11:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,943 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
|
|
|
Mar 17 2012, 12:14 AM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,943 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
QUOTE(Augus7 @ Mar 17 2012, 12:10 AM) just flash via cwm http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1131950 |
|
|
Mar 17 2012, 02:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,943 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
|
|
|
Mar 17 2012, 05:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,943 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
|
|
|
Mar 19 2012, 07:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,943 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
|
|
|
Mar 19 2012, 11:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,943 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
|
|
|
Mar 19 2012, 11:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,943 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0423sec
0.53
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 07:09 AM |