The Nokia PureView Pro comes is equipped with an even larger sensor, 1/1.2” approximately 2.5 larger than the sensor used in the Nokia N8.

Nokia 808 PureView lens and sensor specifications
•  Carl Zeiss Optics
•  Focal length:  8.02mm
•  35mm equivalent focal length:    26mm, 16:9    |      28mm, 4:3
•  F-number:  f/2.4
•  Focus range:  15cm – Infinity (throughout the zoom range)
•  Construction:
·  5 elements, 1 group.All lens surfaces are aspherical
·  One high-index, low-dispersion glass mould lens
·  Mechanical shutter with neutral density filter
•  Optical format: 1/1.2”
•  Total number of pixels:  7728 x 5368
•  Pixel Size:  1.4 microns

Purity of detail.
Even digital SLR images have a certain softness. With oversampling, however, images can be noise free,
yet incredibly detailed and defined. Zoom into the 5Mpix images at 100% magnification on your PC
screen, and you’ll see. There’s something beautifully pure about the detail — not enhanced in anyway.
Look closely at some grass… it’s amazing.

Faster shutter speeds.
With the Nokia 808 PureView, you get effective maximum aperture throughout the zoom range.
Whereas with optical zoom, less light tends to reach the sensor as the zoom increases. At maximum
zoom, 5.4x more light reaches the Nokia PureView Pro sensor than a broadly equivalent optical-zoom
digital camera (f/5.6 as opposed to f/2.4). And this means you get the benefit of faster shutter speeds.
e.g. If a conventional digital camera set to ISO 100 uses a shutter speed of 1/30th second,
the Nokia 808 PureView uses 1/180th second in the same lighting conditions. Or, looking at
it another way, if a digital camera uses ISO 600 for a shutter speed  of 1/30th, the Nokia 808
PureView could maintain the same shutter speed with ISO 100 — significantly reducing the
visual noise you’d see in the resulting image. This also means that the Nokia 808 PureView’s
effective flash range is virtually maintained at all zoom levels, rather than being significantly
reduced as the zoom increases.

Goodbye to distortion.
Distortion on all images is negligible. Whereas with optical zoom, images tend to get more distorted
towards the edge of the frame (with bent vertical and horizontal lines) at the top of the zoom range.
Silent zoom.
The zoom function is completely silent — which is really important when shooting video.

Less is more.
The simple structure of Nokia PureView Pro beats more complicated designs hands down. Image
definition is pin sharp, way superior to conventional zoom designs. Conventional designs need many
more lens elements to provide the zoom capability and correct aberrations, but these interfere with
definition and/or light transmission. Our simple structure has enabled a significant improvement in
manufacturing precision, and our lenses are produced with 10x greater precision than SLR lenses.
This was essential to allow the PureView Pro sensor and optics to work in complete synergy.

What is the sensor size? If bigger than N8 Ok-lah if not pergi main jauh-jauh

if this camera come out with android, i'm sold .

noise...

why still ARM11 is the point.why still symbian is acceptable coz upgrade still coming.from ARM11>ARM A8>ARM A9>ARM A15...now already A15 era...

bro... want or not the pureview 808?? 

808 have 512MB ram woh... 

Let me c if i can get the config setting from technical dept. Finger crossed 

silky smooth with lots apps running correct!! 
who need GIGABYTE... 

The stock Android launcher and browser scrolling is seriously flawed. I'm 99% certain that it's the animation algorithm Google's using, so it doesn't matter if it's dual-core, quad-core it'll always lag because it's not redrawing consistently and maintaining a stable frame rate.

Google needs to hire a video game programmer to show them how to maintain a stable update-per-second and frame-per-second even if the processor is some cheapo single core, because desktop games have been doing this without problems since 1995.

I did say stock Android. I tested Galaxy Nexus Ice Cream Sandwich. Lags a lot compared to iOS and WP, especially with Live Wallpapers. It may be GPU accelerated but they're still using a crappy rendering feedback algorithm.

Even on the SGS2 with I think has a better GPU the home screen swiping doesnt feel as responsive as iOS.

This is not a GPU/CPU issue, it's a rendering algorithm issue.

If the sensor as big as APS-C like NEX, or even Alpha SLT/ Nikkon/Canon DSLR, than only can compare.. now still kenot..Still smaller than micro 4/3 as this is only micro 4/5 size haha

i like Nokia Maps more than Garmin Maps

on software point of view, you can't just level a group to the best in the group
for this to happen, you'll need to implement artificial intelligence to somehow conclude the best one from the group
and the difficulty is on how you going to know which is the best in that group
the sensors are exposed to random colours at specific time
further more if artificial intelligence was implemented, it will require more processing power than this 1.3GHz
and it has already been explain that a proprietary chip has been developed for this tech