Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
12 Pages « < 9 10 11 12 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Samsung Galaxy S II Official Thread V28, A smart phone, a smart user.

views
     
TheLaptopDudeGuy
post Mar 13 2012, 11:59 AM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
2,583 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(erymanthus @ Mar 13 2012, 11:57 AM)
I'm downloading XXLPQ from Intratech site....it is soooooooo slooooooowwwww....3 KB/sec...
*
probably since everyone downloading too tongue.gif i'll wait till devs ICS theme it


Added on March 13, 2012, 12:08 pm
QUOTE(antt00 @ Mar 13 2012, 11:53 AM)
Its the code of the rom. Like our DXKL3 etc. The 2 so far ICS rom is UHLPE and XXLPQ

I think LPQ is better cos its XX.
*
Where u find LPQ? Only see LPJ in intratech thread rclxub.gif so many versions of ICS, so confusing

This post has been edited by TheLaptopDudeGuy: Mar 13 2012, 12:08 PM
TheLaptopDudeGuy
post Mar 13 2012, 12:13 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
2,583 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(waveweaver @ Mar 13 2012, 12:12 PM)
Arghh..now got confused. Which one is the official Samsung ICS coz E and J was the leaked firmware. Don't know about Q though..better wait from Sammobile :-(
*
I think J shud be official firmware since its on intratech now, and he never post leaked firmwares
TheLaptopDudeGuy
post Mar 13 2012, 12:22 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
2,583 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(yvliew @ Mar 13 2012, 12:16 PM)
I heard LPQ is the official dude..... why r u all saying LPJ??
*
Whoops my bad sweat.gif

QUOTE(antt00 @ Mar 13 2012, 12:21 PM)
Below LPE is LPQ lar.  I think his thread too long.  Just ctrl +  f and find lpq.
*
Ok thanks! Found it
TheLaptopDudeGuy
post Mar 13 2012, 02:44 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
2,583 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(-kytz- @ Mar 13 2012, 02:14 PM)
Crap. I got false info doh.gif Sorry to dissapoint you guys.

It was actually an Asus product launch sweat.gif
*
Wonder what they gonna launch hmm.gif maybe padfone or infinity pad
TheLaptopDudeGuy
post Mar 13 2012, 02:48 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
2,583 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(-kytz- @ Mar 13 2012, 02:46 PM)
Might be the T700 series?
*
Hopefully smile.gif that tablet is super awesome.
TheLaptopDudeGuy
post Mar 13 2012, 02:52 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
2,583 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(ngkhanmein @ Mar 13 2012, 02:51 PM)
dual core pun x stable, now quad dy?? ppl said i5 will release on august.. i think s3 will release on Q1 2013
*
Its not about stable, its more about power
TheLaptopDudeGuy
post Mar 13 2012, 02:53 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
2,583 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(rattan @ Mar 13 2012, 02:52 PM)
rclxms.gif


Added on March 13, 2012, 2:53 pm

also about battery life
*
True, without proper optimizations quad core gonna suck juice like no tomorrow
TheLaptopDudeGuy
post Mar 13 2012, 02:56 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
2,583 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(ngkhanmein @ Mar 13 2012, 02:54 PM)
power but not stable hmm.gif what for? battery life easy to solve just buy another extra battery or charge 24/7
*
I meant that the reason why everyone is going quad core is not for stability, its for more power. Most average users (including me) dont really like carrying around an extra battery.
TheLaptopDudeGuy
post Mar 13 2012, 03:13 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
2,583 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(XeactorZ @ Mar 13 2012, 03:11 PM)
yea
hope it using exynos 5450
else use snapdragon s4 also can, but I know is impossible to use it on samsung flagship
*
Using snapdragon s4 would be a bad idea, since so far they only have adreno 2xx graphics, by mid-late yr, they'll be totally obsolete.
TheLaptopDudeGuy
post Mar 13 2012, 03:19 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
2,583 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(XeactorZ @ Mar 13 2012, 03:16 PM)
lol
but now just hope that samsung fast announce s3 on 15th march !!!
what spec also can ~.~
*
I'd rather let them take their time to tweak and improve the S3. Specs most likely a quad core exynos with dual/quad graphics and 720p AMOLED screen. Thats all that i'm sure the S3 will have
TheLaptopDudeGuy
post Mar 13 2012, 03:37 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
2,583 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(XeactorZ @ Mar 13 2012, 03:24 PM)
haha agree
and i totally can't imagine if s3 using full hd amoled screen ~.~
and camera either 8/12 MP also okay, as long as better quality + zero shutter lag biggrin.gif
and got camera shutter button is the best thumbup.gif
so fast fast announce it, already got money to buy it already mad.gif vmad.gif
*
If full hd dunno how i will read the text doh.gif camera hopefully similar to htc/apple's f2.0 lens, since S2 camera is pretty bad in low light conditions, and better quality and focus ability, S2 camera has HORRIBLE focusing.

TheLaptopDudeGuy
post Mar 13 2012, 03:42 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
2,583 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(XeactorZ @ Mar 13 2012, 03:40 PM)
lol
camera must improve
those f2.0 lens i totally dunno rclxub.gif
just the camera better than s2 can adi
*
The lower the 'f' the better it is, or at least thats how i think since f2.0 is better than f2.2 or f2.4 as f2.0 allows more light into sensor, so more light in low light situations
TheLaptopDudeGuy
post Mar 13 2012, 04:04 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
2,583 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(MYstombox @ Mar 13 2012, 03:54 PM)
More light allowed into the sensor.

Low light conditions, the aperture doesn't have to stay open as long.

Thereby reducing chances of shaking, and whatever u can associate with blurry low light photos.


Added on March 13, 2012, 3:55 pm"Samsung's latest 8MP cameraphone sensor has backside illumination, zero shutter lag (Update: specs)"

From engadget on the camera.

Wow, I'm interested in the 'backside illumination'. The human kind.
*
So the higher the aperture the better, and the lower the focal length the better?
TheLaptopDudeGuy
post Mar 13 2012, 04:17 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
2,583 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(MYstombox @ Mar 13 2012, 04:12 PM)
Focal length is the distance between the lens and the sensor.

Aperture size is the opening of the "lens hole" that lets in light.

So he's right, bigger aperture, lower focal length is better if u want lower f number.

but not always possible.
*
Ok thanks smile.gif so why dont oems make like a f5/0 sensor?
TheLaptopDudeGuy
post Mar 13 2012, 04:28 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
2,583 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(MYstombox @ Mar 13 2012, 04:19 PM)
f/5 has a aperture to focal length ratio.

Its length / aperture size.

Not aperture/f-length.

We're looking for a smaller f-number.

so f/2 is actually very(very very) respectable already.


Added on March 13, 2012, 4:22 pm

Are you sure?
because magnification depends on the distance of object to the lens.
And we're not really talking about magnification here, we're talking about f-number.
*
Ok i think i get it now thanks, so f/1 will be better than f/2?

TheLaptopDudeGuy
post Mar 13 2012, 04:36 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
2,583 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


Time for new thread biggrin.gif
TheLaptopDudeGuy
post Mar 13 2012, 04:53 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
2,583 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(arslow @ Mar 13 2012, 04:51 PM)
No its not,I made that ROM two days ago in my sleep when I was in Hogwarts doh.gif
*
LOL i love ur reference to hogwarts

Apparently he's blind till cant see any reference of ICS in this thread doh.gif stupidity really no limits

This post has been edited by TheLaptopDudeGuy: Mar 13 2012, 04:55 PM
TheLaptopDudeGuy
post Mar 13 2012, 04:54 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
2,583 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(MYstombox @ Mar 13 2012, 04:39 PM)
Yes, f/1 will allow more light to hit the sensor than f/2 for the same given amount of time the lens aperture is open.
Example:

If the aperture is open for 1 second for both f/1 and f/2 lenses, assuming both are open at max aperture setting.

Picture in f/1 will be brighter than f/2.

This is useful mainly in low light conditions.

But sometimes in very bright conditions this may be a drawback as the shutter speed can only be that fast. smile.gif

This sucks right? hahaha...

When you think f/1 is better than f/2.

Until you realise that when background light is so bright your picture loses all detail, then you want an f/5 lens. tongue.gif
*
Ok i get it now, needs to be just right, cannot too much or too little. Thanks agn smile.gif
TheLaptopDudeGuy
post Mar 13 2012, 04:57 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
2,583 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(arslow @ Mar 13 2012, 04:55 PM)
Seriously, I've only been in this thread for one week, and I feel like assassinating him already...-____-!
*
I know, pretty much everyone here does.

Since he so rich got w,note and 2 s2, hopefully he go buy s3 and go be annoying there, and finally in months we'll have peaceful thread free of annoyance
TheLaptopDudeGuy
post Mar 13 2012, 05:03 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
2,583 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(Fallenangelz @ Mar 13 2012, 04:59 PM)
well. i nvr saw him surface at GalNote thread there. too bad, my AK47 is ready for him at there d.
*
Lucky for gnote users there.

I wish can send annoying users to bora bora island, teach them lesson to be not annoying


Added on March 13, 2012, 5:04 pm
QUOTE(arslow @ Mar 13 2012, 05:03 PM)
Cant wait for that day to come lol sweat.gif

So,eventhough official ics ROM and kernel is out right,doesnt mean that cm9 will have video recording right?
Kernel source is different compared to those released one,izzit? hmm.gif
*
CM isnt based on samsung firmware, so i dont think so.

This post has been edited by TheLaptopDudeGuy: Mar 13 2012, 05:04 PM

12 Pages « < 9 10 11 12 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0189sec    0.29    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 01:56 PM