Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Patch 1.4.3, Brotoss rejoice. Terran sadden.

views
     
evofantasy
post Feb 21 2012, 02:15 AM

Avadion of the Enders
*******
Senior Member
2,690 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Penang/ Kuala Lumpur
QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Feb 21 2012, 01:50 AM)
i knew how to play infestors. but i didnt knew how to play ultralisks. i lost a winning game cuz of that.

sour. f***ing terrans and their god damn siege tanks.
*
ultralisk - the legit way to throw games
Quazacolt
post Feb 21 2012, 02:34 AM

Riding couple
*******
Senior Member
5,365 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: KL Malaysia


QUOTE(evofantasy @ Feb 21 2012, 02:15 AM)
ultralisk - the legit way to throw games
*
ok
SiewKaiz
post Feb 21 2012, 03:35 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
304 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


QUOTE(FLampard @ Feb 21 2012, 01:09 AM)
anyone know how to counter siege tanks + vikings?
*
better composition of siege tanks n viking
or marauder medivac vikings
quest_5692
post Feb 21 2012, 08:22 AM

yo chick, im not buaya
*****
Senior Member
853 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(FLampard @ Feb 21 2012, 01:09 AM)
anyone know how to counter siege tanks + vikings?
*
as a terran? marauder vikings.
jeffvip
post Feb 21 2012, 08:23 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
134 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(FLampard @ Feb 21 2012, 01:09 AM)
anyone know how to counter siege tanks + vikings?
*
TvT is always positioning, no right or wrong unit composition. hardest MU of all imo. I do understand a bit now after 1 year of playing TvT. Send us the replay in terran strategy thread and quest will answer for you tongue.gif

QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Feb 21 2012, 01:50 AM)
i knew how to play infestors. but i didnt knew how to play ultralisks. i lost a winning game cuz of that.

sour. f***ing terrans and their god damn siege tanks.
*
since when u play 1v1 game? season 1?
quest_5692
post Feb 21 2012, 08:24 AM

yo chick, im not buaya
*****
Senior Member
853 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
if siege tank viking vs siege tank viking, just add raven for pdd, so much diff. but i personally dont like to clash playstyle, so boring and you cant exploit timings.
Quazacolt
post Feb 21 2012, 09:13 AM

Riding couple
*******
Senior Member
5,365 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: KL Malaysia


QUOTE(jeffvip @ Feb 21 2012, 08:23 AM)
TvT is always positioning, no right or wrong unit composition. hardest MU of all imo. I do understand a bit now after 1 year of playing TvT. Send us the replay in terran strategy thread and quest will answer for you  tongue.gif
since when u play 1v1 game? season 1?
*
i played a few just before season end just to league myself smile.gif
FLampard
post Feb 21 2012, 01:51 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
590 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(quest_5692 @ Feb 21 2012, 08:22 AM)
as a terran? marauder vikings.
*
the siege tanks wont wipe out the marauders? do i need to spread them out while marching in?
quest_5692
post Feb 21 2012, 04:44 PM

yo chick, im not buaya
*****
Senior Member
853 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
well, what you need to do is catch the tanks unsiege. if their tanks are sieged, they can nvr move in to kill you right? if they siege half unsiege half to crawl in, their fire power will still be reduced by half, if you are 200/200 you still can go in. then you replenish your marauder ball faster than his tank ball and you can win. and your upgrades should be faster too because marauders are cheap on gas and can easily mass produce compare to tanks.

but then this is the stupid way la. you can still do it tho.

the smarter way is hide a lot of vikings, then suddenly kill all his vikings with your viking ball. then use medivac to drop your marauder on top of his siege tank and win easily.
evofantasy
post Feb 21 2012, 05:01 PM

Avadion of the Enders
*******
Senior Member
2,690 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Penang/ Kuala Lumpur
QUOTE(quest_5692 @ Feb 21 2012, 04:44 PM)
well, what you need to do is catch the tanks unsiege. if their tanks are sieged, they can nvr move in to kill you right? if they siege half unsiege half to crawl in, their fire power will still be reduced by half, if you are 200/200 you still can go in. then you replenish your marauder ball faster than his tank ball and you can win. and your upgrades should be faster too because marauders are cheap on gas and can easily mass produce compare to tanks.

but then this is the stupid way la. you can still do it tho.

the smarter way is hide a lot of vikings, then suddenly kill all his vikings with your viking ball. then use medivac to drop your marauder on top of his siege tank and win easily.
*
bio is nt really ez to play vs mech imho...
u need really good map awareness n control to abuse the mobility and catching tanks unsiege...
macro is important as well in getting more bases and upgrades...
i think unless u are diamond, better to jz go tank viking as well >.<
quest_5692
post Feb 21 2012, 05:44 PM

yo chick, im not buaya
*****
Senior Member
853 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(evofantasy @ Feb 21 2012, 05:01 PM)
bio is nt really ez to play vs mech imho...
u need really good map awareness n control to abuse the mobility and catching tanks unsiege...
macro is important as well in getting more bases and upgrades...
i think unless u are diamond, better to jz go tank viking as well >.<
*
i actually think instead of going tank viking vs tank viking, lower league players should go bio vs mech.... i dno but i feel in mech vs mech, seriously the better player wins. thats like fact in sc2. bane ling vs bane ling, the btr player wins. 4gate vs 4 gate and alot more...thats why i mentioned earlier i prefer not to have a clash of style in my games cuz im a noob hehe. tongue.gif

when playing diff style, you can exploit opponents weakness and try to hide your own....more mind game maybe, but comeback will be possible when you exploit the right timing. but these requires experience as well.

and playing mech vs bio is like up hill battle seriously. your opponent will constantly trade with you, can nvr move out of base, once move out, 4 dropship behind base, kena flank, trade army at watch tower, then when you settle down and move in again, his bio is 200/200 again because he got 6 base in taldarim and you have 3 only.
evofantasy
post Feb 21 2012, 06:13 PM

Avadion of the Enders
*******
Senior Member
2,690 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Penang/ Kuala Lumpur
QUOTE(quest_5692 @ Feb 21 2012, 05:44 PM)
i actually think instead of going tank viking vs tank viking, lower league players should go bio vs mech.... i dno but i feel in mech vs mech, seriously the better player wins. thats like fact in sc2. bane ling vs bane ling, the btr player wins. 4gate vs 4 gate and alot more...thats why i mentioned earlier i prefer not to have a clash of style in my games cuz im a noob hehe. tongue.gif

when playing diff style, you can exploit opponents weakness and try to hide your own....more mind game maybe, but comeback will be possible when you exploit the right timing. but these requires experience as well.

and playing mech vs bio is like up hill battle seriously. your opponent will constantly trade with you, can nvr move out of base, once move out, 4 dropship behind base, kena flank, trade army at watch tower, then when you settle down and move in again, his bio is 200/200 again because he got 6 base in taldarim and you have 3 only.
*
maybe the starport transition of viking banshee?
i mean he even asked the question of splitting his marauders, i think his army gonna melt to tanks >.<
of course doom drops would work great though since i dun think they are used to turret rings/ sensor towers yet...
FLampard
post Feb 21 2012, 10:01 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
590 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(quest_5692 @ Feb 21 2012, 05:44 PM)
i actually think instead of going tank viking vs tank viking, lower league players should go bio vs mech.... i dno but i feel in mech vs mech, seriously the better player wins. thats like fact in sc2. bane ling vs bane ling, the btr player wins. 4gate vs 4 gate and alot more...thats why i mentioned earlier i prefer not to have a clash of style in my games cuz im a noob hehe. tongue.gif

when playing diff style, you can exploit opponents weakness and try to hide your own....more mind game maybe, but comeback will be possible when you exploit the right timing. but these requires experience as well.

and playing mech vs bio is like up hill battle seriously. your opponent will constantly trade with you, can nvr move out of base, once move out, 4 dropship behind base, kena flank, trade army at watch tower, then when you settle down and move in again, his bio is 200/200 again because he got 6 base in taldarim and you have 3 only.
*
viking + siege tank counters everything bro....i actually asked someone this question and he told me something i never thought about!!! NUKE. nuke his siege and he will unsiege then marauders rush in = win.

also mass vikings can pull a little trick call heat seeking missle, why i never think about this yesterday!!?!? i went BC instead. lol
TSkding2
post Feb 21 2012, 10:30 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,007 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
Why is this thread became Terran discussion?
yuvster
post Feb 21 2012, 10:34 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
377 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Penang


Again I say, cuz this is just how we roll around here.. And the transition from Patch discussion to GSL Finals discussion to Terran strategy discussion is something of beauty I must say.. Hahaha
evofantasy
post Feb 21 2012, 10:41 PM

Avadion of the Enders
*******
Senior Member
2,690 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Penang/ Kuala Lumpur
QUOTE(kding2 @ Feb 21 2012, 10:30 PM)
Why is this thread became Terran discussion?
*
OPness knows no boundaries
FLampard
post Feb 21 2012, 10:42 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
590 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(kding2 @ Feb 21 2012, 10:30 PM)
Why is this thread became Terran discussion?
*
user posted image

This post has been edited by FLampard: Feb 21 2012, 11:00 PM
quest_5692
post Feb 21 2012, 10:58 PM

yo chick, im not buaya
*****
Senior Member
853 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(FLampard @ Feb 21 2012, 10:01 PM)
viking + siege tank counters everything bro....i actually asked someone this question and he told me something i never thought about!!! NUKE. nuke his siege and he will unsiege then marauders rush in = win.

also mass vikings can pull a little trick call heat seeking missle, why i never think about this yesterday!!?!? i went BC instead. lol
*
nuke range < tank range. opponent just need to scan and tank will kill the ghost......well, yeah slayers boxer could have pulled it off.......

and theres no such thing as viking + siege tank counters everything......if so, everyone will just use that 1 strat right?


i could prove you otherwise any day of the week. marauders are good against tank.

for HSM, actually PDD are very good as well. smile.gif they absorb f***load of shots.
TSkding2
post Feb 21 2012, 10:59 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,007 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
QUOTE(yuvster @ Feb 21 2012, 10:34 PM)
Again I say, cuz this is just how we roll around here.. And the transition from Patch discussion to GSL Finals discussion to Terran strategy discussion is something of beauty I must say.. Hahaha
*
Frankly speaking, it is disgusting.
Quazacolt
post Feb 21 2012, 11:28 PM

Riding couple
*******
Senior Member
5,365 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: KL Malaysia


QUOTE(kding2 @ Feb 21 2012, 10:59 PM)
Frankly speaking, it is disgusting.
*
^

6 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0237sec    0.63    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 10:48 PM