Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
FC Enthusiast Thread
|
yamato
|
 Jan 13 2012, 09:49 AM
|
|
im a practical guy, not going to spend 90k for an insignt or 140k for prius just to declare im a tree hugger.
for my current ride. i remained everything stock bcoz i believe the parts designed by hundred if not thousand of experience automotive engineers have gone thru proper R&D cycle with proven performance & duranbility.
only thing i did to improve my FC is to make it lightweight by removing junk in the trunk. no excessive load in truck/glove box watsoever.
Still i must stress, FC is vastly depend on individual driving style.
-edited-
thx zeroSP for the correction
This post has been edited by yamato: Jan 13 2012, 10:46 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
yamato
|
Jan 13 2012, 11:33 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(calvin_ng @ Jan 13 2012, 10:29 PM) actually I find it quite funny... you all claim RON97 can go further and RON95 no so far... sure mou... as I know all car made for RON95 has a very lousy combusion ratio 10:1 parts ratio.. a proper RON97 will have 12:1 or more... as I know all Made in Malaysia car and Japan (CKD model) is made for RON91... why cause Thailand and Indon only have RON91 and RON92... if you want good milage for RON97 do like my friend do send his car to re-tune ECU confirm you get super good milage... 10:1-11:1 is normal or average compression ratio, not VERY LOUSY compression ratio. skyactiv is 14:1 can run ron95 no prob. tune ECU can boost 200% or 300% better fuel efficiency? if not just slightly better only la. dont exaggerate things pls  |
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0157sec
0.60
6 queries
GZIP Disabled