Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 FC Enthusiast Thread

views
     
epo
post Jan 31 2012, 11:30 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
892 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sg Buloh


430km with 35L of RON95
100% hway driving... collected all speed trap whichever come 1st... cry.gif
SUSjflcorp
post Feb 1 2012, 01:36 AM

DrFeelGood
******
Senior Member
1,219 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
From: Somewhere in cyberspace.


My Saga FLX latest FC 496.5kms for 33 litres. BHP Infiniti 2X Ron95 only!

Never ever bothered about Ron97 as it is all placebo effect only. Our cars designed for Ron91 and above.....
TSericmaxman
post Feb 1 2012, 08:35 AM

-
*******
Senior Member
7,951 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(jflcorp @ Feb 1 2012, 01:36 AM)
My Saga FLX latest FC 496.5kms for 33 litres. BHP Infiniti 2X Ron95 only!

Never ever bothered about Ron97 as it is all placebo effect only. Our cars designed for Ron91 and above.....
*
So

RON91 > RON97 ?

This post has been edited by ericmaxman: Feb 1 2012, 08:36 AM
SUSjflcorp
post Feb 1 2012, 03:57 PM

DrFeelGood
******
Senior Member
1,219 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
From: Somewhere in cyberspace.


QUOTE(ericmaxman @ Feb 1 2012, 08:35 AM)
So

RON91 > RON97 ?
*
Which means unless your car is turbo charged etc, using 95 or 97 no difference, anything above Ron92 is wasting the energy only....
stickynote
post Feb 1 2012, 05:00 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
59 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


Kelisa 1.0 Auto 38 litres (Ron 95) about 450km and I am very heavy footed with 100% city driving.

This post has been edited by stickynote: Feb 1 2012, 05:01 PM
ibnuasad
post Feb 20 2012, 06:37 PM

A screw is not a screw until you screw it!
****
Senior Member
558 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Lowyat.Net



Checkout my sig for updates biggrin.gif
longman07
post Feb 21 2012, 09:37 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
22 posts

Joined: Mar 2007


QUOTE(turbocharged @ Jan 13 2012, 02:24 PM)
why ron 97?
*
power? yes, i agree. but value for money? i dont think so. 97 is rm2.8 what.
davidke20
post Mar 30 2012, 12:28 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
From: Kuala Lumpur


Just to catch up with previous NOT WELCOMED posting in BLM thread regarding FC, now I've moved here to continue my journal in finding the optimal fuel efficiency of my SAGA BLM. Currently I'm doing 2krpm shift up + smooth acceleration. 80% town driving.

Anyway, the test got some hiccups now as my wife went and refill SOME petrol to my BLM, therefore the current reading is NOT accurate. I'll have to bring the car and refill full tank again during the weekend, so I can update the fuelly with correct amount of petrol being poured in VS actual amount of traveled distance.

As for the ISWARA.... I was waiting the fuel warning indicator to lite up, but it didn't. By the mark of my record 450km, I already started to worry I'm actually running way low of fuel, and mother of Mary I couldn't find my ESSO/MOBIL along the way. So, reluctantly I dragged all the way until reach the petrol station nearby my house. And below are the readings... I still think the fuel warning indicator is malfunctioned just right at this time!

user posted image
user posted image
RM0.14/km?!?!?!??! WTF?!?!?!?!?!

So, I guess from today onwards, I'll be a road hogger for very² long time in my ISWARA. I am already a road hogger in my BLM, so after this 2 tank of petrol, I'll have to decide whether continue to hog the road with 2krpm in the BLM or I will try higher RPM to achieve an optimal torque to avoid power loss that resulting high fuel consumption.

Cheers

Dave
FlamingFox
post Mar 30 2012, 08:42 AM

o(@_@)o
******
Senior Member
1,344 posts

Joined: Oct 2005


QUOTE(zeone @ Jan 31 2012, 11:29 PM)
So...? Happy, rite? tongue.gif
*
That's about the same as mine but my clubmates can get like 14-17km/l on average. Must be some serious disciplined slow driving.
davidke20
post Apr 2 2012, 08:46 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
From: Kuala Lumpur


2 tank of petrol gone for my BLM. Below is the current reading with 2krpm shift up:

1st tank is running on 11.3km/litre (ESSO/MOBIL)
2nd tank is running on 10.1km/litre (SHELL)

Now, officially scrap the idea of 2krpm shift up. No torque, no speed, like crap. Am pushing it up to 3krpm from this tank of petrol onwards.

Cheers,

Dave


Added on April 5, 2012, 10:24 pmOK. Back to normal driving style, 4~6krpm shift up did makes a difference. Current production is only 11.3 km/litre on my ISWARA.

user posted image
user posted image



This post has been edited by davidke20: Apr 25 2012, 08:05 PM
TSericmaxman
post Aug 16 2012, 06:39 PM

-
*******
Senior Member
7,951 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
Screw FC

/thread

3 Pages < 1 2 3Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0174sec    0.36    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 11:56 PM