If you want to save $50.
Do you really need it?
Fujifilm X-Pro1/X-E1
Fujifilm X-Pro1/X-E1
|
|
Mar 9 2012, 03:20 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
133 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
If you want to save $50.
Do you really need it? |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 9 2012, 04:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
11,808 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
too late, my fren took the option with the cab liao, hahhahahah
|
|
|
Mar 9 2012, 07:24 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,785 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
|
|
|
Mar 9 2012, 08:47 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
106 posts Joined: May 2011 |
|
|
|
Mar 10 2012, 01:29 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,925 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Got to finally feel and touch xpro1 today at boeing photo. Didnt not test it since they only have the body + they dont have demo unit. Its quite big compared to x100 (i think lol)
|
|
|
Mar 10 2012, 10:16 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
11,808 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
Initial impression
Body too light, doesn't feel as solid, ergonomics so so nia, I had a hard time holding it without strap, hoping a thumbs up will be available soon Lens wise, still ok. Manual focusing is no where near to the experience on a rangefinder One thing I like is the macro function, the 35mm can actually focus dem close!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 10 2012, 12:26 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,073 posts Joined: Aug 2006 |
this is excellent high end IQ camera
|
|
|
Mar 11 2012, 12:13 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,785 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
|
|
|
Mar 11 2012, 10:10 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
511 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
QUOTE(gnome @ Mar 10 2012, 01:29 AM) Got to finally feel and touch xpro1 today at boeing photo. Didnt not test it since they only have the body + they dont have demo unit. Its quite big compared to x100 (i think lol) The xpro1 is about the size of D7000 with 35mm lens and it cost more too.People complain SLR big and heavy so why buy xpro1 I wonder. |
|
|
Mar 11 2012, 12:21 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,447 posts Joined: Mar 2006 |
QUOTE(enviro @ Mar 11 2012, 10:10 AM) The xpro1 is about the size of D7000 with 35mm lens and it cost more too. the style and uniqueness..... D7000 just look like a typical DSLR.... and 80-90% dunno u carry a D7000/600D or wat ever model it is... they just know it is a big camera with lens pointing out.People complain SLR big and heavy so why buy xpro1 I wonder. |
|
|
Mar 12 2012, 10:09 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
11,808 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
enviro? wen is D7000 tat small? same size as the xpro?
to me the xpro feels light, plasticky, not the weight i was looking for |
|
|
Mar 12 2012, 10:29 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
511 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
QUOTE(rx330 @ Mar 12 2012, 10:09 AM) enviro? wen is D7000 tat small? same size as the xpro? Can compare here . Place the xpro behind the D7000 and see the to me the xpro feels light, plasticky, not the weight i was looking for extra width. http://camerasize.com/compare/#7,258 |
|
|
Mar 12 2012, 11:03 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
11,808 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
Nikon D7000 is 5% (7.5 mm) narrower and 28% (23.2 mm) taller than FujiFilm X-Pro1.
Nikon D7000 is 81% (34.5 mm) thicker than FujiFilm X-Pro1. Nikon D7000 [780 g] weights 73% (330 grams) more than FujiFilm X-Pro1 [450 g] (*inc. batteries and memory card). |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 12 2012, 04:31 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,410 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: MLK |
Still too expensive to be the people's M9.
|
|
|
Mar 12 2012, 04:50 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,963 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
Should be good camera for natural light photography aka street photography..
|
|
|
Mar 12 2012, 08:54 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,447 posts Joined: Mar 2006 |
Seems like the autofocus speed Abit slow... But dunno about the manual focus hope it is not like x100.
|
|
|
Mar 12 2012, 11:34 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,410 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: MLK |
It's still contrast AF so kinda expected. But the dynamic range is insane.
http://www.techradar.com/news/photography-...51503?artc_pg=5 |
|
|
Mar 13 2012, 08:00 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,447 posts Joined: Mar 2006 |
wow so high.... its more than a Full Frame that much......
But i am still concern about manual focusing.... is it that the x100 need turn a lot round just to focus abit front and back. |
|
|
Mar 13 2012, 10:07 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
11,808 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
in the EVF, it shows the focusing distance
but frankly, manual focusing can play far far compare to rangefinder hopefully i get my kipon adapter ASAP, just bought it then can try the manual focusing with other lenses |
|
|
Mar 13 2012, 11:22 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
133 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0280sec
0.73
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 07:48 AM |