rm4k- middle end x100 and rm7k- high end x-pro1.
Fujifilm X-Pro1/X-E1
|
|
 Jan 9 2012, 10:06 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Junior Member
511 posts Joined: Nov 2011 
|
Smart marketing move by Fuji. Divide and conquer the market. rm2K- lower end x10.
rm4k- middle end x100 and rm7k- high end x-pro1. |
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Jan 9 2012, 05:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member
511 posts Joined: Nov 2011
|
Fuji X-pro1 : size 83x138x38, Leica M9 : size 80x138x37 so the
fuji is slightly larger ?  |
|
|
Mar 6 2012, 02:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member
511 posts Joined: Nov 2011
|
QUOTE(Riggo @ Mar 6 2012, 01:07 PM) they have forgotten leica or leica is far higher than the chart? lol Are Fuji x cameras still high quality after X100 and X10 issues and Xpro still? and  if retro is stylish maybe we should be wearing bell bottoms and afro hairstyle again.  |
|
|
Mar 11 2012, 10:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Junior Member
511 posts Joined: Nov 2011
|
QUOTE(gnome @ Mar 10 2012, 01:29 AM) Got to finally feel and touch xpro1 today at boeing photo. Didnt not test it since they only have the body + they dont have demo unit. Its quite big compared to x100 (i think lol) The xpro1 is about the size of D7000 with 35mm lens and it cost more too.People complain SLR big and heavy so why buy xpro1 I wonder.  |
|
|
Mar 12 2012, 10:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Junior Member
511 posts Joined: Nov 2011
|
QUOTE(rx330 @ Mar 12 2012, 10:09 AM) enviro? wen is D7000 tat small? same size as the xpro? Can compare here . Place the xpro behind the D7000 and see the to me the xpro feels light, plasticky, not the weight i was looking for extra width. http://camerasize.com/compare/#7,258 |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0240sec
 0.17
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 01:57 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.