http://www.anandtech.com/show/6872/the-gre...ldxbenchmark-27
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6876/microso...vices-in-3dmark
Interesting articles in Anandtech comparing graphic performance of different tablet platforms.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/6877/the-gre...qualizer-part-3

And this one show that the current hign end tablet platforms probably can match GPU from 2006
The power of progress

Haswell IGPU has different flavour. The most powerful IGPU in Haswell most probably will only come with the high end Haswell chip, and it is also likely that Haswell ULV chip will carry the less powerful IGPU.

Anyway, Nvidia GT740M will still most probably beat/match any flavour of Haswell IGPU, and laptop with GT740M is pretty cheap anyway. There are even some good deal with GT750M

If you are looking for gaming laptop, don't bother to wait for Haswell, unless you want the better battery performance.

If you are looking for ultrabook without discrete GPU, and not in a hurry to get it, probably should wait.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/6926/intel-i...3e-gets-a-brand

The IGPU in Haswell is called Iris 5100 (GT3 28W, in 4th gen i7 ULT) and Iris Pro 5200 (GT3e, only 4th gen quad core);
HD 4200 / 4400 / 4600 / (GT2), HD 5000 (GT3 15W, can be found in ultrabook 4th gen ULT ).

This post has been edited by nexus2238: May 3 2013, 04:33 PM

I remember GTX Titan (which is off GK110) is drawing 250W (?) TDP. Not sure if GK110 can actually be scaled down to run at lower TDP. If not, not sure if any laptop has that kind of juice to run it

http://www.geforce.com/hardware/notebook-gpus

I think the main selling point is it is sitting on the same 45W TDP as the CPU. So laptop brands can offset the cost of discrete GPU + additional cooling solution + additional space required to house the discrete GPU & cooling.
That is quite a bit of saving there for brands.
For consumers, the saving will be in the form of lower price of hardware + lower power bills.
At 1366 x 768 resolution, it is very serviceable. Sooner or later, expect to see wave of 14" (the low end model) launch with it only without discrete GPU

I am interested to see the performance of those HD50/46/44/4200 in ULT / ULX as well.

This post has been edited by nexus2238: Jun 3 2013, 01:27 PM

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-Intel-...00.93188.0.html

review on HD 4600. Interesting About ~ 30% better than HD 4000.

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-AMD-Ra...0M.97807.0.html

Review of HD 8970M.

sifu, if express in term of %, will sound "funnier"

http://www.anandtech.com/show/7287/analyzi...tops-vs-laptops

pretty good summary on the state of affairs between mobile vs desktop CPU / GPU.

You may start here:
http://www.notebookcheck.net/Mobile-Graphi...List.844.0.html

I'll take 765M over 675M. Performance is about on par, but 765M consume 30% less power, which mean less heat and lower electricity bill

Read the notebookcheck article properly lah
According to that, the older GK107 GT740M is somehow spec with 128bit memory bus, and will perform better.
You need software like GPU-Z.

This post has been edited by nexus2238: Dec 30 2013, 12:24 AM

http://www.anandtech.com/show/7834/nvidia-...p-battery-boost

Article on Nvidia 8xxM series.
Better battery run time with better performance is always a good thing