QUOTE(skeleton202 @ Apr 24 2012, 01:03 AM)
not sure if it's idiot question or not but can we upgrade notebook gpu like in same family such as from gt540 to gt550?
http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/863032GPU Discussion V2
|
|
Apr 24 2012, 05:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,672 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
QUOTE(skeleton202 @ Apr 24 2012, 01:03 AM) not sure if it's idiot question or not but can we upgrade notebook gpu like in same family such as from gt540 to gt550? http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/863032 |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 24 2012, 01:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,672 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Apr 24 2012, 09:06 AM) NBC's Intel HD4000's performance benchmark is out: Nice scores.http://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-HD-Grap...ed.73567.0.html More reasons to get an Ivy Bridge ultrabook miahahaha At least can play more games than previously. |
|
|
Apr 25 2012, 08:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,672 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
QUOTE(Acid_RuleZz @ Apr 25 2012, 12:37 AM) It's official. HD7970M is a downclocked version of HD7870 Niiice!AMD officially announces Radeon HD 7000M mobile GPUs - Fudzilla If this GPU price really $100 lower than GTX675M it really a huge bargain. Some more info and scores : http://www.anandtech.com/show/5778/amd-lau...00m-mobile-gpus Can't wait to see the 7770M performs! Current benchmark shows that the 7770M scores 2417 in 3Dmark11. About on par with the GT650M. It should perform quite well on new games. This post has been edited by Amal: Apr 25 2012, 08:45 AM |
|
|
Apr 29 2012, 02:01 AM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,672 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
QUOTE(Acid_RuleZz @ Apr 28 2012, 05:56 PM) The question is can Nvidia provide something as powerful with similar power consumptions? That's the beauty of the AMD 7870. ![]() Well, maybe they can. Current Kepler GTX 680 does consume less power than the previous generation. This post has been edited by Amal: Apr 29 2012, 02:12 AM |
|
|
Apr 29 2012, 02:49 AM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,672 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
QUOTE(Acid_RuleZz @ Apr 29 2012, 02:23 AM) ^ not sure about that.. but indeed 7870 is the best bang for the bucks at the moment. If I'm not mistaken, that scores came from a custom driver.its live people. ![]() Not sure whether it will be much higher if it is with official driver. Whatever it is, gotta love the the new 28nm GPU(Both AMD and NVIDIA)! |
|
|
Apr 30 2012, 02:27 AM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,672 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
A Benchmark comparison of : GT650M, GTX560M, GT640M, GT555M, GT630M(rebadge GT540M)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « This post has been edited by Amal: Apr 30 2012, 02:27 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 30 2012, 02:40 AM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,672 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
QUOTE(Acid_RuleZz @ Apr 30 2012, 02:34 AM) Probably due to the CPU.The GT640M is using the ULV i7 2637M 1.7GHz (2 cores) http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForc...0M.71579.0.html While the GT555M is using the i7 2630QM 2GHz (4 cores) http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForc...5M.41933.0.html Need to wait for more review of the GT640M using different CPU, then we will see the difference. I think. This post has been edited by Amal: Apr 30 2012, 02:42 AM |
|
|
Apr 30 2012, 02:53 AM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,672 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
QUOTE(Acid_RuleZz @ Apr 30 2012, 02:48 AM) ah.. i see. Yeah, seen that quite often.oh wait.. the hell is this? http://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-Radeon-HD...0M.73855.0.html desktop test system? Like I explain before this, a 7770M might scores around GT650M. Here is the 7970M on desktop test system. http://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-Radeon-HD...0M.72675.0.html Usually the scores are correct. Just not so much benchmark. This post has been edited by Amal: Apr 30 2012, 02:55 AM |
|
|
Apr 30 2012, 03:55 AM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,672 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
|
|
|
Apr 30 2012, 02:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,672 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
|
|
|
Apr 30 2012, 09:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,672 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
QUOTE(markypcs @ Apr 30 2012, 09:07 PM) http://shop.lenovo.com/SEUILibrary/control...84607F2E57AE7FD It still does. Look at the tech spec pdf.It uses GT 640M now. Not the GT 640M LE. Very nice!! |
|
|
Apr 30 2012, 10:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,672 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
QUOTE(markypcs @ Apr 30 2012, 10:08 PM) Well, as you know, my budget is $1k. If the prices of the refreshed IB goes beyond $1k, no point waiting then right? Even the Acer M3 is about.. $1.3k AUD if I'm not mistaken. Too expensive le If i'm not mistaken the upcoming Gigabyte U2442 will be price around USD1k.Comes with : 14" 1600x900 LED Backlight i5-3320M 2.6Ghz GT 640M Hybrid Drive (SSD(upto 512GB) + HDD(upto 1TB)) Backlight Keyboard Dual Fan (better cooling) Got thunderbolt port (can opt for eGPU 18.5mm to 20.5mm thick 1.49KG Not sure when it will be out though. |
|
|
Apr 30 2012, 10:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,672 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1 2012, 09:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,672 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
|
|
|
May 3 2012, 06:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,672 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
|
|
|
May 7 2012, 12:52 AM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,672 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
|
|
|
May 11 2012, 07:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,672 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
|
|
|
May 20 2012, 09:53 AM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,672 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
QUOTE(Acid_RuleZz @ May 20 2012, 07:06 AM) Apparently it will not take the crown from 7970M. Yeah, read that couple of days ago.» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Saucebbq: Nvidia preparing GTX 680M for Computex | NVIDIA Readies GK104-based GeForce GTX 680M for Computex Not sure legit or not. It's the same picture I've posted a month ago before the 7970M showed up. Unless nvidia still gonna go with it and fight later with GTX685M? http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopi...entry50315501 QUOTE(Amal @ Apr 6 2012, 02:25 AM) GTX680M!! GTX680M [attachmentid=2775558] GTX680M OC? [attachmentid=2775559] Where are you AMD? |
|
|
May 20 2012, 11:01 AM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,672 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
|
|
|
May 20 2012, 11:36 AM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,672 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
QUOTE(Acid_RuleZz @ May 20 2012, 11:06 AM) A big hope... But still, looks kinda possible because of the low TDP... ![]() A GTX670 is 25% faster than the 7870(based for 7970M) or as fast as the desktop 7970. Assuming it strip down or downclock abit aggressively than the 7870. Even a 20% faster than the 7970M will still be a wonder compared to the previous generation. A 7970M is almost 50% faster than the GTX580M(GTX675M), if a GTX685M is 20% faster than the 7970M, means it is 80% faster than the GTX580M! |
| Change to: | 0.0209sec
0.91
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 01:38 AM |