Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
AMD X2 Overclock, will this help?
|
gengstapo
|
 Nov 12 2005, 09:39 AM
|
|
QUOTE(arj @ Nov 12 2005, 01:40 AM) Right now I'm using the X2 with DFI Ultra-D and OCZ VX. The best heatsink would be the Thermalright XP120/XP90C. If you're looking for something less expensive then I can't really recommend you one because I'm a bit clueless about heatsinks. other than XP-120/ XP-90, cheapo HSf tat can be compare to them is TT DIY PIPE101 last time b4 switching into XP-90, im using it & the performance almost same wif XP-90 IMO |
|
|
|
|
|
gengstapo
|
Nov 17 2005, 09:28 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(Lemon @ Nov 17 2005, 01:34 AM) 2. If the proc is dead because of overvolt, am i able to RMA it? nope if u tell em', so no need to tell em' liao juz say its dead & if no burn mark, sure can RMA  |
|
|
|
|
|
gengstapo
|
Feb 26 2006, 07:03 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(joylay83 @ Feb 26 2006, 04:10 PM) opty 165  higher quality chip. running it now at 20 degrees C with SI-120 heat sink, no air con. yeahh.. sure choose Opty over X2.. bigger cache.. high OC'ing ability |
|
|
|
|
|
gengstapo
|
Mar 20 2006, 05:50 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(jarofclay @ Mar 20 2006, 05:42 PM) On the dual cores, the E6 are toledos if I am not mistaken and E4 are Manchesters. Toledo are the better cores since they are used in the high end models such as X2 4800+ while the Manchesters are the cacat version. izzit?? i tot Manchesters wf the 512kb L2 while; those toledos r the 1mb L2 cache..  |
|
|
|
|
|
gengstapo
|
Mar 20 2006, 09:01 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(jarofclay @ Mar 20 2006, 08:32 PM) That's what I was saying.  hehee.. i c the diff ady.. the new X2 version(E6) comes wif toledos but still has 512kb L2 while; older or previous version, comes wif manchester cores guess those toledos should be better, IMO  |
|
|
|
|
|
gengstapo
|
Mar 21 2006, 08:34 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(wild_card_my @ Nov 19 2005, 06:46 AM) so people if opty 165 and x2 3800 are priced the same, which one would you choose.. one is based on toledo and the other on manchester... one has 1mb cache @ 1.8ghz while the other 512kb cache @ 2.0 ghz.. both are great overclockers, though the x2 does a lil better at the end achieving up to 2.8ghz.. but that's very subjective anyway and depends much on your chip... but which one would you choose? please state the reason hurmm if price would be the same then i choose X2 lorr, becoz the latest version comes wif toledo core(same wif opty) but limited L2 512kb cache. but then, the multiplier higher than opty 165 with 10 over 9. sure easy to OC up to 2.6Ghz. on opty side, need to OC "lil higher abit" to get 2.6Ghz becoz of the 9 multiplier IMO  This post has been edited by gengstapo: Mar 21 2006, 08:46 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
gengstapo
|
May 16 2006, 09:58 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(soulfly @ May 16 2006, 09:50 PM) nothing... just asking. who knows using some ram can use lower vcore compare to other type of ram. atlast, got ppl here that having the same opinion wif me i believe using samsung chipset can trigger the HTT higher than other chippy but then just a theory |
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0239sec
0.31
7 queries
GZIP Disabled