Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Lawyer's Corner v2, One-stop centre for any legal queries

views
     
Airoha
post Dec 29 2011, 11:43 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
36 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
Hi, can any lawyer advise whether the developer S&P lawyer can do this?
The scenario is like this:-
I bought a condo with S&P free using developer lawyer. S&P and loan agreement signed and stamped already. Today, S&P lawyer call and said the developer want to amend something on 1 page of the S&P and the effect to me is minimum. (I haven't received what is the changes). The lawyer will send 4 copies of A4 papers to replace that page to me and ask me to initial of all 4 pages of A4 paper and sent remaining 3 pages to her. My question is, is this common practice in Malaysia? Is the S&P still legally valid? IF I refuse to the changes, what can I do? (The developer is a listed company)

This post has been edited by Airoha: Dec 29 2011, 11:43 PM
Airoha
post Jun 14 2012, 11:51 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
36 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
Hi Dariofoo,

I have a house rented to a family. I wish to take back the home after the expiration of the tenancy agreement.

Can I put some special conditions like below:-
Upon determination of the term:-
1. The Tenant agreed the Landlord has the right to reject renewal or to grant to Tenant a further term of tenancy to the Demised Premises.
2. The Tenant agreed the Landlord has the right to cut off all supply of water and electricity to the Demised Premises.

Please note, the Tenant pay his rental every month (although not punctual) not doesn't breach any term and condition in the tenancy agreement.
Will putting the above term and condition make the tenancy agreement become invalid?
Thank you.
Airoha
post Jun 14 2012, 06:30 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
36 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
QUOTE(dariofoo @ Jun 14 2012, 04:35 PM)
Greetings,

Well, Clause 1 is actually understood and you don't need to put it in. It is the right of the vendor whether to agree to an extenstion/renewal of the tenancy once it has expired. But there is no harm in doing so. You can do so just for the sake of completion.

Clause 2 is a bit on the sensitive side for several reasons.

- it is too general and wide.
- it basically gives you the right to terminate utilities at any time without any reason whatsoever.
- if there is a clause which says that the vendor shall grant the tenant peaceful and uninterrupted usage of the premises, then Clause 2 s a direct contradiction to it.
- who disconnects water and electricity? Are you going to instruct the JMB to lock the meter? Or the water utility company to terminate the account? If TNB, are you going to request TNB to disconnect?

I gather that your intent is to stop the tenant from racking up huge bills. As such, you would need to amend the clause to be more detailed to include the following circumstances:
1. When does the right to terminate arises?
2. Do you need to give notice before termination or is it without? How long would the notice be?
3. Is there a maximum limit for the tenant to have outstanding before you exercise the right?
4. If the arrears are paid, when do you reconnect? Who has to reconnect (or contact the authorities to reconnect?) Who bears the cost?
5. Does it go to the root of the contract and gives you the right to terminate the contract?

Consider all that first before proceeding.  icon_rolleyes.gif
*
Hi Dario,

Thank you for the advice. notworthy.gif
My intention is to get back my house at the earliest.

The previous tenancy agreement lapsed few month ago. The tenant has been dragging his feet to move out, giving all kind of excuses. He even challenge me to serve him notice to vacant or accept the rental for additional months. I am reluctant to go to court. I have no choice but to draft a new agreement as he promise (verbally) to move out after few months.

All the above led me want to include certain clauses to "encourage" the tenant to surrender vacant possession of the demised premises on or before determination of the term. (determination of the term means end of the agreement, right?)

Clause 1 & Clause 2 are only enforceable after the end of the term (determination of the term). This should be clear and enough? Can a Landlord do that? meaning I will cut the water and electricity after the agreement lapsed without giving any notice.

Shouldn't the clause which says that "the vendor shall grant the tenant peaceful and uninterrupted usage of the premises" is only enforceable during the term of the agreement? After end of that period of time, the Landlord has no obligation to covenant the above.

It seems like to terminate the contract, the tenant needs to breach the term and conditions stated in the contract. If no breach happen, the landlord has no reason to terminate the contract. Shouldn't the end of contract will give Landlord a bit of breathing space to have remedy without going to court?




Airoha
post Jun 18 2012, 11:47 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
36 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
QUOTE(dariofoo @ Jun 15 2012, 12:05 AM)
Reluctant to go to Court? Why? If you don't want to seek recourse of the law why even have an agreement in the first place?

Anyway, if you still insist on those terms, you would need to amend clause 2 to reflect that it is only enforceable at the end of the tenancy period. Bear in mind that in the event that the tenant still refuses to move out, it is illegal to take further self help measures like breaking the locks to gain access. It would be advisable to obtain a court order.
*
Hi Dario,

Thanks for the advice. I will go to court as last resort only as the litigation process take a lot of time and money. Furthermore, aggressive lawyer is needed to handle this kind of case.

I signed the agreement with the tenant for another 6 months. Let's wait and see what happen by then.

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0417sec    0.61    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 02:41 AM