QUOTE(cheahcw2003 @ Jan 9 2012, 11:01 AM)
Well, i just pointed out the way the forumer "Youcity", carried out the points.
He/she may question like in such a manner :
If this project safe? or how the developer can mitigate the landslide risk? or how other investors think about the safetiness of this project? is the developer capable to contruct such products in the hill side?
One who invest or ready to invest have the rights to ask such questions, in the more diplomatic and humble way, but what he/she pointed out is to accuse this will be another Bkt Antarabangsa alike project, and attach a link to the said Bkt Antarabangsa tragedy. This will make others forumers confused and panic.
In Malaysia law, one is not guity until u prove it guilty. To prove it guilty, u need witness and concrete evidences. You cant just simply shoot in the air and said it is guilty. Usually to prove the evidence, we need professional thoughts to certify, ppl like doctors, engineers, or geologist in this case.
Remember when NATURE CALL it will cause NATURAL DISASTER - one do not need evidence at this point in time as it can't be seen at the moment until the whole development has been completed i.e the impact caused by the development on the soil condition of the Hill.
Be caution as the Chinese proverb say "SELLING FLOWER WILL SAY FLOWER's FRAGRANT IS NICE".
The landslides occurred lately eg Damansara 21, Bukit Antarabangsa etc also got their so-called experts and geologist but when landslide took place these experts' earlier "very sure" opinion and finding that the development is safe will be transformed by saying they are unable to predict nature call i.e unusual heavy rains, underground soil movement is unpredictable etc and sometime they do blame the impact caused from other nearby developments.
The danger will remains when the site of development is a water retention area - better see if there is pond, waterfall etc at the site and nearby surrounding area. If so, risk is there but how terrible will be the risk can only seen after Nature Call (if any).
I wish repeat again that I am not anti-Damansara Foresta but my concern is for good deed,in that. those possibilities must be addressed to. So the choice is left with those potential buyers but for me I will personally consider the following points:-
(a) if I think the risk does not exist then I will go ahead;
(b) if Iam in doubt then I will go to the site again to conduct own investigation - go further then
those visible now; and
© if I think there is risk then I will seek 2nd opinion from expert like geologist and soil expert
consultant as mentioned by forumer cheahcw2003.
Of course I will pay the geologist and soil expert consultant for their services rendered and if there is mishap (Natural Disaster) maybe I can take them to court for compensation for giving wrong advice.
Pls don't