Look at Seri Riana, wangsa maju -price

Amazing.

hahah agreed with u 600psf abit on the high for SG now, future we donno.

SG when started selling its around 300psf for lower floor unit. Cant really compare, as SR now only started selling. IJM and UOA not much different either in terms of reputation

Since you name LRT, shopping mall and design as plus point for SR,

I could simply name 3 things where SG better:

1) Freehold
2) Density
3) Freebies.

I dont want to make it like a sales pitch.

I just amaze with the way price escalated in KL, which clearly indicated with SR project.

Dont get me wrong, SR seems attractive for investment.

SG land size 4.5 acres

No problem.

Currently, personally, I see that SR area surely doing better for rental investment play ..
That area, it's sort of walking distance to LRT (Sri Rampai) and Middle Eastern expat focusing area (together with Jelatek).

One saying if you go for investment go nearer to train station; or else for own-stay get somewhere within driving distance is sufficient enough so less people buying it for rental, more bought for own-stay (SG is sitting in the middle of driving distance to Monorail - HKL, Ampang line - Titiwangsa, Kelana Jaya line - Wangsa Maju & Taman Melati.

Other than that, Freehold and Leasehold is not direct comparable.

Let's do not compare them, different market of them.
Sekian berita, terima kasih  .

Just pass by Setapak Green... The night view in light really nice now...     

Also, just notice that every level of the lift entrance is with plastic ceiling and down-light... Zheng leh... 

P/S: Sorry for my cheap plak iphone camera.... Quality not that good in night time (with less light exposure .... ) 

Yeah, some more they're still holding 35 units, if they finalize it well, say 100K difference for each unit of the 35 remaining units = 3.5mil, if take half means 50K difference for each unit of the 35 remaining units = 1.75mil, it means no cost at all, can get more profit somemore!

I didn't check it, roughly 430psf ~ 460psf

---

Added on

what the : p for?

I don't know .. but personally I think almost fully-surrounded (other than main entrance side) with chain fencing probably too much

Some notes purely from pics:
1. Chain linked fence is a big letdown
YA, even though some of the apartment/PPR flat also use brick wall fence, this UOA really dont knw wht to say...the developer price is not cheap, they should provide better fencing material..

2. Pool too near to landscape. Potential problem of soil dropping into pool
Ya, the soil land too near to pool...


3. Stamped concrete floor at pool may not be the best option
I belive there are more better options than this cement lookallke...and dont think the cost will higher a lot..


4. Overall building looks gorgeous though
ya..this is the best building at the area, color scheme is nice..

5. Entrance without roof could be problem during rain unless they are using card with infra tech rather than touch concept.
too bad i think for the picture, they are using the touch concept...normally the long range touch is with bigger panel...

i am really getting so old nowadays

said wanna upload the park residence chain link fence tapi lupa buat,

sorry

here u go.
[attachmentid=3221705]
[attachmentid=3221706]

He is not uncle. He is andrew, Head oc customer care for uoa. Look x syok? Not bcoz of cement. Is something else. Mayb v paster then too much.