I'm currently still stick with F2000, no idea which weapon is better than this one.
Most of the time I heal and revive soldiers around me, check out my heal score.
Assault Class Discussion Thread
|
|
Nov 6 2011, 10:30 AM, updated 15y ago
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
385 posts Joined: Sep 2007 |
Discussion thread for Assault Class, share your thoughts!
I'm currently still stick with F2000, no idea which weapon is better than this one. Most of the time I heal and revive soldiers around me, check out my heal score. |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 6 2011, 11:38 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
385 posts Joined: Sep 2007 |
M416 is better than F2000?
|
|
|
Nov 6 2011, 01:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
385 posts Joined: Sep 2007 |
QUOTE(Neo|ofGeo @ Nov 6 2011, 12:43 PM) assault class are special yet common in battlefield 3 Awesome sharing, like it. in my opinion many thought that support class will give better supression but at the same time carrying those LMG aren't easy either if you are equipped with M16A3/AEK-971/AK-74M try to shoot at enemy location to assist your team you will see that it have same effect for awhile which is enough having M320 as underslug also help alot as you fightning in tight corner(never use this though) weapon like AN-94/F2000 and M416 is firepower > rapid fire but sadly people tends to use this to camp more not only easy to aim but have stopping power eventhough assault is medic they have to advance first because their weapon is the most stable then other class even engineer M14A1 and AKS-74u isn't on par with M16A3/AK-47M on accuracy issue there are also issue with attachment which many prefer grib/heavy barrel/4xscope(or 3.4) they tends to be multipurpose player long range/short range/accuracy RDS/Holographic is some vets favourite scope which offer fast aim in combat with nice barrel aim this is what i think of assault class I like one thing about AEK-971 which it able to fires very quick. F2000 has a lot of firing damage, but recoil wise, so-so. AN-94 is firing two bullets at a time, not really suitable for me... |
|
|
Nov 6 2011, 02:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
385 posts Joined: Sep 2007 |
QUOTE(Neo|ofGeo @ Nov 6 2011, 02:01 PM) err you can switch it to auto by clicking default button V Yeah I know about button V, but for AN-94, maximum only 2-dots. If suddenly an enemy appear in front of you, you will need to click spam your mouse instead of holding on it.but i warn ya beginner going to |
|
|
Nov 6 2011, 06:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
385 posts Joined: Sep 2007 |
Changed to M416 today, fall love on it.
|
|
|
Nov 6 2011, 06:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
385 posts Joined: Sep 2007 |
QUOTE(Everdying @ Nov 6 2011, 06:20 PM) AN94 feels powerful and fires like LMG at fully auto and like LMG the rate of fire is slow, unless you use burst mode. I'm about the same with you, never use grenade launcher. AEK, felt funny in the beta, so i never bothered to use it so far. F2000 has the highest rate of fire, again something i dont like cos its hard to conserve ammo, usually 1 clip at fully auto kill roughly 2 ppl due to it blazing thru the ammo real fast. M416 and M16A3 are the most balanced ones, from stopping power to conserving ammo, usually 1 clip can kill 3-4 ppl since its easier to control the ammo at fully auto. all my assault rifles always with foregrip and heavy barrel. scope depends on the rifle and map, some rifle easier with kobra, some with rds, some with holo, so depends. but they all share the irnv in common when i feel like it. Added on November 6, 2011, 6:23 pmoh yea, i never bother with all the nade launchers. med pack all the way. Anyway I have no idea why I can't control well with scope, I prefer assault rifle without scope. Maybe I'm used to play a lot in Call of Duty, which I never use scope for rifle at all. |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 7 2011, 05:58 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
385 posts Joined: Sep 2007 |
|
|
|
Nov 7 2011, 07:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
385 posts Joined: Sep 2007 |
|
|
|
Nov 10 2011, 06:23 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
385 posts Joined: Sep 2007 |
QUOTE(y3ivan @ Nov 9 2011, 07:10 PM) its smart way for DICE to force players to spend more hours of torture to slowly grind your way up. Even lower rank also can pawn higher rank like crazy, depend on their skill. and the game has huge balance issues, especially higher rank players vs lower rank players. |
| Change to: | 0.0243sec
0.58
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 04:05 AM |