Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
3 Pages  1 2 3 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V55!, The Orange Legion

views
     
Newbieeeeee
post Oct 31 2011, 02:15 PM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


NutZ748 : The blueness of the sky also depends on your shutter speed. The faster, the more blue.
Newbieeeeee
post Oct 31 2011, 05:30 PM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(hazril @ Oct 31 2011, 03:39 PM)
are you sure ka???that means if i shoot at 1/4000s sure blue kaw2 issit???
*
QUOTE(zstan @ Oct 31 2011, 03:20 PM)
Why a?
*
Yeah! Go try it. 1/2000 vs 1/20. You get a blue-er sky.
Newbieeeeee
post Oct 31 2011, 06:17 PM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(lwliam @ Oct 31 2011, 05:46 PM)
Your answer fail laaa
*
Well, didnt I say faster shutter speed = blue-er sky?
Newbieeeeee
post Nov 1 2011, 06:45 AM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(albnok @ Nov 1 2011, 01:05 AM)
In other news, the Sony-Alphanatics Competition (November 2011) is on!

fansoption: Nice #1!

gizmo_pony: Congratulations!
*
I don't get this part...

Do not send your picture title or description in your email! The picture must fit the title

Newbieeeeee
post Nov 1 2011, 02:12 PM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(wings_silver @ Nov 1 2011, 07:59 AM)
mean just send the picture that can related to the title enough. you don't need to set a title for your picture. or write a description for it. by looking at the picture can know it's bring the meaning of the title. not by reading the picture title u set or read though your picture description. hope that help
*
Oh I see! Now I get it! Haha. Thanks bro!
Newbieeeeee
post Nov 1 2011, 11:16 PM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(drpower @ Nov 1 2011, 10:31 PM)
OK, I am really undecided.. please help me.

A77 16-50mm or A65 18-55mm?
*
Bro.. the answer is obvious...
Newbieeeeee
post Nov 3 2011, 04:37 PM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(NutZ748 @ Nov 3 2011, 03:29 PM)
http://youtu.be/O5bXkRx2Jc0?hd=1
its funny to see those fanboys trolling around!
*
Not fair. Use the a77 @ 6fps and see the difference.
Newbieeeeee
post Nov 4 2011, 06:59 PM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


Macro photography [1:1 macro] No crop no edit.

user posted image

Added : Crap resolution by photobucket. doh.gif

This post has been edited by Newbieeeeee: Nov 4 2011, 06:59 PM
Newbieeeeee
post Nov 5 2011, 02:21 PM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(fansoption @ Nov 5 2011, 10:37 AM)
Newbieeeeee: This is call Macro Photo mah. Welldone. You are getting there keep it up. shoot more.
*
Thanks! biggrin.gif


Added on November 5, 2011, 2:22 pm
QUOTE(NutZ748 @ Nov 4 2011, 09:22 PM)
something like this lor http://www.alphanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=42&t=23648
WOAH someone stepping in MACRO worrrr flex.gif
*

Yeah! biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by Newbieeeeee: Nov 5 2011, 02:22 PM
Newbieeeeee
post Nov 6 2011, 10:58 AM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(ahpingko @ Nov 6 2011, 10:26 AM)
eh guys...what can i use to protect my fisheye lens surface ah??..too big surface, very prone to accidentally scratched..and is it possible to use any ND???..such a super ultra wide angle..
*
Not possible. You can't screw a filter on. That's why it comes with a built in hood.

And also, the surface is not flat..

This post has been edited by Newbieeeeee: Nov 6 2011, 10:58 AM
Newbieeeeee
post Nov 6 2011, 10:22 PM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(DolphinDiver007 @ Nov 6 2011, 10:16 PM)
haloo.... anyone there?? i'm using A350. wanna buy a wide angle lens.... wonder which one to go for?? also, is langkawi cheaper??
*
Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 smile.gif
Newbieeeeee
post Nov 6 2011, 10:55 PM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(DolphinDiver007 @ Nov 6 2011, 10:40 PM)
u have tat?? how about Sony 500mm F/8 reflex lens?? any idea how good is this??
*
Nope I dont. Cause I already have a 16-105 lens and I dont really use <24mm. I dont have the 500mm lens either, but I've talked to a dude who is an ex owner, he said that its awesome under bright sunlight.







Guys, I'm gonna go for a Rugby thingy next Saturday & Sunday. What do I have to bring? First time doing sports photography.

Body, grip with 2 batts, 70300G, 16105? Flash? No?
Newbieeeeee
post Nov 7 2011, 09:24 AM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(zstan @ Nov 6 2011, 11:11 PM)
I don't think you are allowed to use flash la. 70300G all the way.


Added on November 6, 2011, 11:13 pm
Yeala then no point what if like that. Just blindly fire nia.
*
Okay, Thanks! smile.gif


Added on November 7, 2011, 9:25 am
QUOTE(NutZ748 @ Nov 6 2011, 11:13 PM)
guys...im preparing my december event shooting...
i have 2 options to choose...
1) get Flash F43 and keep my 16-80
2) get a sony/Minolta 50 1.4

which one is better?


Added on November 6, 2011, 11:14 pm
yea no point....just tried because just now family outing...shooting kids hahaha
*
Buy my F42 so that I can get the F43/58. whistling.gif

This post has been edited by Newbieeeeee: Nov 7 2011, 09:25 AM
Newbieeeeee
post Nov 7 2011, 11:51 AM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(NutZ748 @ Nov 7 2011, 11:33 AM)
hahaha i dunwan F42...i wan COBRA  flex.gif
*
vmad.gif
Newbieeeeee
post Nov 10 2011, 04:37 PM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(Lacus @ Nov 10 2011, 04:16 PM)
Guys just wonder. I can see 3 small dots on both OVF and also using LV. Took a few photo but i don't see the dot on the pictures. So is it sensor/mirror that have the dirt? should i send it for servicing/warranty?
*
Whoa whoa whoa. Same as mine! but mines OVF only though.
Newbieeeeee
post Nov 12 2011, 06:15 PM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(ahpingko @ Nov 12 2011, 05:05 PM)
just sold out my 75-300 just now.. rclxms.gif

btw, i saw 1 shop selling Tamron AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro Zoom at rm600...and tested it...but i didnt bring my a550 go...they used a pentax body and test..the AF speed is faster and IQ is sharper...quite nice even at indoor...bokeh at 300mm F5.6 super damn smooth..the macro mode at 300mm F5.6 at 0.95m distance can give 1:2...quite nice!!!..

but i am thinking to get beercan coz of its F4 and sharpness... hmm.gif  hmm.gif

how about the focusing speed of beercan on my a550?..and without warranty quite dangerous..what if it spoiled?..cost to repair is high?..

what i want is to use for portraits..and shoot some long distance objects like birding/moon-ing/spying ppl brows.gif

yes, i do need F4 and sharpness...trade off is an old lens without warranty..

how?..any advice?
*
70300G SSM. brows.gif
Newbieeeeee
post Nov 12 2011, 11:40 PM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


Looking for a nice range, Sharp prime lens.. which do you all recommend? The minolta 135mm f/2.8 is abit too far. Maybe a 85mm.. ? With reasonable pricing. Not above 1.5k..
Newbieeeeee
post Nov 13 2011, 07:50 AM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(kysham @ Nov 12 2011, 11:48 PM)
tele or wide?
*
Looking for wider ones. With superb bokeh. How's the sigma 20mm f/1.8?


Added on November 13, 2011, 7:51 am
QUOTE(NutZ748 @ Nov 12 2011, 11:51 PM)
sony/minolta 50 1.4? or siggy 30 1.4??
*
Hmm. Sigma 30/1.4 sounds good. Will do some research on that. Thanks!


Added on November 13, 2011, 7:52 am
QUOTE(alphazal @ Nov 13 2011, 04:19 AM)
i c................. biggrin.gif


Added on November 13, 2011, 4:22 am
that mean when using high shutter speed we can't bounce right?
*
Ya bro. Only if its direct.

This post has been edited by Newbieeeeee: Nov 13 2011, 07:52 AM
Newbieeeeee
post Nov 13 2011, 11:55 AM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(shootkk @ Nov 13 2011, 08:35 AM)
Want a cost effective, sharp and compact little 85m prime? Look no further than the 85mm f2.8 SAM!! Great performance for its price point!! And it's a FF lens!!!

A few shots with the 85mm:

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Below RM 1k. You can't beat the value of this lens!!
*
Ahh. I like this. drool.gif but I already have my Tamron 90/2.8. sad.gif I don't feel like its worth it having 2 same range lenses.


Added on November 13, 2011, 11:59 am
QUOTE(NutZ748 @ Nov 13 2011, 09:40 AM)
haha it was in my wishlist before i get my bebyzeiss  wub.gif  now no budget ady~
have to spend money on my new workstation GPU  drool.gif

i never knew flashes can only fire fast sync speed while pointed dirctly!
why? why cant bounce? doh.gif
i don't like harsh lights, but i dont like slow sync speed in bounce too  cry.gif

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «



Added on November 13, 2011, 9:41 am
wide open?
*
Yup. I'm not sure why, but if I were to make a smart guess, I'll say that its because when its on HSS, the flash can't charge to full power before the shutter closes. Therefore the flash power is cut down. And with this cut down in power, the power is not enough to bounce. Thus only allowing you to use in direct. Since direct requires less.


Wait wait. What am I talking about.. doh.gif

This post has been edited by Newbieeeeee: Nov 13 2011, 12:06 PM
Newbieeeeee
post Nov 15 2011, 12:22 AM

:)
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Home


QUOTE(alphazal @ Nov 14 2011, 11:04 PM)
first of all she like to shoot for long distance subject. hate the short 18-55mm fl rclxub.gif

yup agreed with u NutZ748. i found 2 popular problem with this tammy/sigma.

1- sigma - 
GOOD AF But IQ lost to tammy
and " hansem Lens".

2- Tammy
GOOD IQ but slow AF
and yup not so "hansem' and also heavy -

is not that i can't go with cheaper option like tammy/sony 70/75-300mm but i don't want to end up buying another telephoto lens. for me the most important thing is IQ.. AND sony 70-300g seem to have better control on color fringing which is  i'm very2 particular about this part. really hate to see the purple/blue color.

not so worry about f2.8 ( blur n speed).  biggrin.gif
*
Fringing? You're not comparing light to light bro. Try the Tamron and sigma at f4.5 vs 70300G at f4.5. You can't compare f2.8 to f4.5. If the 70300G can go down to f2.8, I don't think it'll be any better..


3 Pages  1 2 3 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0537sec    0.25    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 07:02 AM