QUOTE(Ramjade @ Jan 30 2017, 05:07 PM)
No. No good. Why? Annualized return only 4.75%, 1.16%, 1.41%. Better put FD if like that. FD beat this return hands down.
Don't look at cummulative. Look at annualised returns. That's how much the fund make in 1 year, how much average 2 years and how much average 3 years.
I do believe PRS have other good points versus FD.Don't look at cummulative. Look at annualised returns. That's how much the fund make in 1 year, how much average 2 years and how much average 3 years.
1. discipline saving, because you can't withdraw. If you still wan't to withdraw (Account B), you will need to pay levi to government 8%, which is a loss. PRS withdrawal is not an option if you asked me.
2. Tax saving, unless your income bracket is not within this.
3. Super long investment horizon, if you are 30y.o., horizon is at least 20years, 40y.o. at least 10years. Cannot compare to Normal UT.
4. Takaful protection based on investment volume. (not all, please check your agent)
5. Taxed, similar to UT, so no need to declare.
6. account to only 6% of malaysian population, you will be eligible to get PRS youth incentive amounting 1000 from government for your saving of your own money 1000.
For PRS fund, most of it is still quote new. 5years the most.
Jan 31 2017, 01:43 PM

Quote
0.0269sec
0.21
7 queries
GZIP Disabled