QUOTE(solstice818 @ Nov 17 2011, 04:28 PM)
Sorry. maybe my english is poor but how the hell one can sit one the fence when he is bias? What on earth are you talking about?
gotta explain everything to the basic level sigh1. two sides, suarez and evra.
2. suarez and evra are mutually exclusive. that means if suarez is right, evra is wrong and vice versa
3. dukered asked my opinion on whether suarez is innocent or guilty
4. since it is always innocent until proven guilty, so innocent lor at the moment
5. but since events are mutually exclusive, me saying suarez is innocent = me saying evra is wrong/false accusation which is not true either.
6. on the fence.
Added on November 17, 2011, 4:43 pm
QUOTE(solstice818 @ Nov 17 2011, 04:31 PM)
Sorry but I think you get my point wrongly. No one is pointing that prostitution is ILLEGAL. But with Rooney married, is that the right thing to do? I dont see anyone of you condemning him for that. Someone actually "blindly defended" him by saying he is young.
So, in this case, IF ( yes, a big IF here) , Suarez really did it, why cant we use the same excuse? So, why can you lots use it and we cant? Such double standard? Anyway, saying that doesnt mean we approve of what Suarez did.He should be punished if he did the wrong thing. Just pointing out how double standard policy works in the mans camp.
btw, pls indicate where and when did i ever say/imply that you cannot use such excuses?So, in this case, IF ( yes, a big IF here) , Suarez really did it, why cant we use the same excuse? So, why can you lots use it and we cant? Such double standard? Anyway, saying that doesnt mean we approve of what Suarez did.He should be punished if he did the wrong thing. Just pointing out how double standard policy works in the mans camp.
This post has been edited by radio_head: Nov 17 2011, 04:43 PM
Nov 17 2011, 04:40 PM

Quote
0.0428sec
1.21
7 queries
GZIP Disabled