Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

English Clubs Liverpool FC- The Kop Talk 2011, Chelsea 1- 2 Liverpool - Maxi+Johnson!

views
     
radio_head
post Nov 17 2011, 04:40 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(solstice818 @ Nov 17 2011, 04:28 PM)
Sorry. maybe my english is poor but how the hell one can sit one the fence when he is bias? What on earth are you talking about?
*
gotta explain everything to the basic level sigh

1. two sides, suarez and evra.
2. suarez and evra are mutually exclusive. that means if suarez is right, evra is wrong and vice versa
3. dukered asked my opinion on whether suarez is innocent or guilty
4. since it is always innocent until proven guilty, so innocent lor at the moment
5. but since events are mutually exclusive, me saying suarez is innocent = me saying evra is wrong/false accusation which is not true either.
6. on the fence.


Added on November 17, 2011, 4:43 pm
QUOTE(solstice818 @ Nov 17 2011, 04:31 PM)
Sorry but I think you get my point wrongly. No one is pointing that prostitution is ILLEGAL. But with Rooney married, is that the right thing to do? I dont see anyone of you condemning him for that. Someone actually "blindly defended" him by saying he is young.

So, in this case, IF ( yes, a big IF here) , Suarez really did it, why cant we use the same excuse? So, why can you lots use it and we cant? Such double standard? Anyway, saying that doesnt mean we approve of what Suarez did.He should be punished if he did the wrong thing. Just pointing out how double standard policy works in the mans camp.
*
btw, pls indicate where and when did i ever say/imply that you cannot use such excuses?

This post has been edited by radio_head: Nov 17 2011, 04:43 PM
radio_head
post Nov 17 2011, 04:46 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(REDShaun @ Nov 17 2011, 04:43 PM)
lol, magical logic from magical troll that is protected from magical mod.. i likes  wub.gif
*
u dont. u cant comprehend so you mask it with this and that. infact every post all you do is answer my questions with more questions.
radio_head
post Nov 17 2011, 04:47 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(solstice818 @ Nov 17 2011, 04:45 PM)
Exactly the same thing I asked in previous post. Judging by the number of troll posts he made in the past, I am surprised he is yet to be permaban!

Anyway, now he is talking with more sense, still acceptable lar.  rolleyes.gif
You claimed yourself to be on the fence but your previous posts condemning him (and us for defending him) clearly reflected otherwise. So, I am amazed with your art of twisting with words. Thanks for explaining though smile.gif
*
bro please once again, why is it all pool fans like to post this that without checking facts? when have i said suarez is guilty? when have i condemned him? i condemned ppl who try to defend him...two different things you know.
radio_head
post Nov 17 2011, 04:49 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(solstice818 @ Nov 17 2011, 04:47 PM)
With this post of yours that full of sarcasm
*
your claim is of double standards, and i dont see a single word saying you cant use this/that excuse. im merely listing down possible justifications


Added on November 17, 2011, 4:50 pm
QUOTE(REDShaun @ Nov 17 2011, 04:48 PM)
i'm that good huh? frustrated much, but don't worry, it's not like we actually care. it's a forum, but you seem to be a little too stress pushing some imaginary point  blush.gif
*
just because i dont add smiley faces and i am blunt and direct doesnt mean im stressed

This post has been edited by radio_head: Nov 17 2011, 04:50 PM
radio_head
post Nov 17 2011, 05:42 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(sKyWiR3pT3lTd @ Nov 17 2011, 05:16 PM)
We get what you mean, and actually lets say we believe there really is no case to answer we would want it to go down as many official channels as possible because after all is said and done, if he can not substantiate his claims beyond reasonable doubt he will have to be charged with making frivolous damaging claims. If Ferguson is up to his usual tricks creating drama to deflect attention from piss poor team selection, attitude and performance than he should bare the just rewards of his poison fruit.

If I thought for one moment Suarez was a racist and was calling him ******, the matter and he would have to be dealt with. But I honestly 100% feel he was winding him up with femine and being little jabs ... you could see it the way he was interacting with him, patting him on the head, getting up close to him looking down his nose at him, calling "Niggereto" or what ever it is suggested, half the team him captained in Ajax were black, I dont for one moment think Luis Suarez is a racist, John Terry on the other hand could easily pass for a National Front leader  whistling.gif
*
substantiate claim....hmmmm

funny i just read an article on that...let me copy paste abit

"claims that if Evra cannot prove that he was racially abused then he should have the book thrown at him. Is that how justice works? Only accuse someone of a crime if you can prove they did it. If you don’t have concrete evidence, shut the f*** up otherwise you run the risk of facing punishment yourself. What an utterly idiotic suggestion.

How much would this policy undermine the Kick It Out campaign, with players who have been racially abused refusing to report any incidents in case a TV camera didn’t pick it up? Can anyone seriously argue that players must be able to prove their claims or run the risk of being banned themselves? To band about phrases like ‘playing the race card’ is cringeworthy and insulting."

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0428sec    1.21    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 10:59 AM