Actually advice is take a look at some of good street shots (that u like) and see if you can do the same. From there u will find ur street shots style. Example majority of time I like street shots with rain in it. So i tried looking for rain scene.

Except don't follow people like gilden and eric kim cause their style is annoying.

Saw him on youtube on street photo. Said he likes how the lady walk (vaguely remember) but miss the shot. Went to the lady and ask her to recreate scene. Like wtf? It's one thing when directing a pose but another when asking to fake a scene and then labelled it "street photo".

Honestly, these shots are nothing interesting......... but looking at ur flickr u got some good ones though.

Steve Mccurry (the one famous for the afgan girl portrait) who is now infamous for heavily photoshopping his street photos, faking scenes and making up fake caption story is forced to reclassified his photojournalism to "visual story" .

You can classify your retake or fake shots as street photos but it losses its iconic status once people found out the real truth .

Google robert doisneau the kiss and first find is "photogarps was staged" or "controversial". However that said despite staged it is a good shot, even to people who not into street photography so I can see why newspaper and magazine picked it up. And i think the reason to why it is iconic cause of the history of controversies, lawsuits and virality of the photos before the truth was revealed. You try same sht today, you can't get away with that.

To each his own opinion.

Composition a bit off but still good pic

This one I like. Good job.

Ok shots but still feel like snapshots. Last one would look better if there is something interesting or juxtapose scene beneath the billboard.

.....not really. Well u got the points right but what i actually meant was the shots needs to have something interesting that will make people look at it and trying to figure out what is going on or admire it or meaningful context. Something out of the mundane. An analogy would be like nascar race. Seeing car going fast around oval seem interesting at first but after a while u just realise its just turning left over and over. But if suddenly u see cars start going right, fly over and people punching each other on track, you will focus on that rather than who wins the race. But of coz, does not have to be something shocking. Lifestyle, artline like buildings can also be interesting if done right, usually people don't see everyday. Except people looking at smartphones lifestyle and shots of beggars, that I already bored

The context is either i dont want to see another of your dang kids or you are a pedo creep .

Just kid. Kid shots are fine but the genre itself is already falling into mundane category.

There definitely context to it and even got one guy commenting on the ahem. So good job!

There is a story there and its a good composition shot.

Nice shot. Was into that sometime ago but lost interest after I realised I rather like it with less crazy colours, just my preference. Will only use the style if the lighting is super boring.

This post has been edited by TrialGone: Jun 29 2018, 11:06 AM