I cannot speak for you as to why you don't/can't see a difference in your setup/situation. However, it is widely known that digital connection creates a sharper and crispier image, especially true with longer run cables. My BenQ FP241W looks like garbage with VGA connection even with sharpness fully cranked up. The details and clarity of DVI/HDMI was so apparent that every one I've shown the comparison to would not say otherwise.

I could explain why would one want stick to analog connection over digital in an audio interface but when it comes to visual interface, 99% of the time digital is better than VGA.

Quality aside, you can forget about watching HDCP materials on VGA (not to confuse with HD files). When it comes to bandwidth, VGA cannot power my U3011.

Hi guys,

planning to buy LG 23" E2341v ... any comment on this particular LCD? 

prefer CCFL backlight over the overrated LED.and of course it is cheaper.
i dont think U2312HM slimmer than U2311H. the dimension look same but U2312HM has curvy edges and stand.

i would say check the DVI cable first
my DVI cable received from purchasing AOC 18''5 RazorBlade LED also give something like this but slight blue colour
open up
find old HD3XXXX DVI cable.plug it in and problem solve
but depends~~not to say i saw everything yet in problem and technical difficulties

On the outside 23” U2312HM looks like a 24” U2412M. The new softer look with rounded edges and great ergonomic functions is re-used and the 23” monitor boasts the same DVI, DisplayPort and D-SUB (VGA) inputs. But one thing is different; size. Even though U2312HM is just one inch smaller than its bigger brother, the real difference is more significant. Because of the 16:9 format – and therefore lower resolution – U2312HM is not as close to U2412M in size, as one might suspect.

On the inside, U2312HM is not much different from the U2412M either. Besides the lower resolution, U2312HM has pretty good picture quality for a monitor in this price range. The Standard picture preset is fairly accurate, viewing angles are wide, response time is fast (and faster than on U2412M), we experienced no clouding and color reproduction in general is good. U2312HM is a value-for-money screen, and even though it offers only few improvements compared to the predecessor U2311H, the new U2312HM is a great monitor for amateurs working with graphic and photography.

Dell U2312HM’s low price also puts it in a favorable position compared to the competition. If you seek better black depth, VA based monitors are still preferable. A low-price alternative could be Eizo’s new FS2332 (test coming soon) but until then I think the U2312HM deserves the same recommendation that we gave U2412M, simply because it offers almost the same picture characteristics at a lower price (and smaller size).

what is the best bargin now for led/lcd 24' ?

no hdmi port ?

I wonder why Samsung or Dell didnt make monitor with glass screen like Apple did. Samsung galaxy S III phone the LCD is super duper beautiful.