Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Public Mutual v3, Public/PB series funds

views
     
SUSPink Spider
post Jun 10 2012, 10:12 AM

Formerly known as Prince_Hamsap
********
Senior Member
16,872 posts

Joined: Jun 2011


There is NO guarantee in investments. If an agent can promise u things, u better ditch him/her.
SUSPink Spider
post Jun 10 2012, 12:07 PM

Formerly known as Prince_Hamsap
********
Senior Member
16,872 posts

Joined: Jun 2011


QUOTE(mois @ Jun 10 2012, 11:52 AM)
Hi guys, i am curious how you guys track your own investment portfolio? Using excel or using some softwares?
*
Excel for me too...totally up to me to customise it for my needs... icon_rolleyes.gif
SUSPink Spider
post Jun 18 2012, 01:02 AM

Formerly known as Prince_Hamsap
********
Senior Member
16,872 posts

Joined: Jun 2011


Parliament dissolved - down
BN win - yea up up up biggrin.gif doh.gif
PR win - down due to uncertainties, but will go even further once things settle down icon_idea.gif
SUSPink Spider
post Jun 26 2012, 10:17 PM

Formerly known as Prince_Hamsap
********
Senior Member
16,872 posts

Joined: Jun 2011


QUOTE(j.passing.by @ Jun 26 2012, 08:48 PM)
Paper or not, a lost is a lost.  sad.gif 
(And not to mentioned the opportunity cost if I have had put the money in FD or EPF.)

Can only hope to be more cautious and recover the lost in near future... and with the support and experiences shared in this forum, it should not be too difficult to achieve.
It's all stated in some of my previous posts since I joined this forum... read them carefully and you should be able to figure out all my mistakes I made.  icon_rolleyes.gif
*
A value is meaningless in isolation, do share with us, how much was your investment capital?

If your capital was 1m, 23K lost is only -2.3% yawn.gif
If your capital was 50K, 23K lost is -46% sweat.gif
SUSPink Spider
post Jun 27 2012, 02:03 PM

Formerly known as Prince_Hamsap
********
Senior Member
16,872 posts

Joined: Jun 2011


QUOTE(j.passing.by @ Jun 27 2012, 02:01 PM)
Take a guess... do you think I would be like this  cry.gif  if it's 2.3%, and which can easily recover by putting the money back into FD?
Take a look at any of the performance charts for China & Far East funds. It's almost near the bottom of 2008.

The question is whether it's already at the bottom for 2012, or will it go down further to 2008 level, or worse still, beyond that bottom!

Take into account that dark clouds is still looming overhead...

Take a look into the fund prices if you want to make a switch... when the market goes down, all funds except bond & money market funds go down, just differences in the percentage of the drops.
========================================

BTW in hindsight the best time to pull out was April 2011. Would have then trim the lost by 12k. The major mistake I made was assuming that it can crawl back to the peak as like the local bourse.
*
dun tell me it's 50%+/- sweat.gif

China bottoming yes, it's obvious from the charts...but how long will it linger there? laugh.gif
SUSPink Spider
post Jun 27 2012, 02:41 PM

Formerly known as Prince_Hamsap
********
Senior Member
16,872 posts

Joined: Jun 2011


QUOTE(j.passing.by @ Jun 27 2012, 02:38 PM)
How high or low the percentage does not really matter when there's plenty of stuff you can do and buy with 21k, but now have to skip.  tongue.gif

Don't be too sure with the assessment, their internal economy could be doing well, but if the yuan goes the way like the rupee does, it won't be helping us much.

Secondly, it is the hedge funds and foreign investors (ie. Euro & US) that drives up the market. Will they be betting their funds elsewhere when there are easier pickings back home?
*
That's why Dow/S&P did better than the rest of the world recently brows.gif
SUSPink Spider
post Jul 1 2012, 07:11 PM

Formerly known as Prince_Hamsap
********
Senior Member
16,872 posts

Joined: Jun 2011


QUOTE(j.passing.by @ Jul 1 2012, 11:07 AM)
Are you trying to start a debate whether distribution increases the NAV of the fund? Please don't... just ended one over at the other thread.  tongue.gif

But a good distribution does shows that the fund is showing returns for the year... if you have been holding it for some time like a year or more... it's so much more exciting than holding a dead fund that shows negative returns.  smile.gif
*
Come I join u here tongue.gif

Let me add a useful point to consider icon_idea.gif

A unit trust fund can have 3 types of gains:
(1) Income from dividends received and interest received. Often, these are received in the form of cold hard cash. These are REALISED INCOMES.
(2) Net gains from disposals of investments (proceeds from disposal LESS cost of sale). This is also a REALISED INCOME.
(3) Fair value gains i.e. market value/"paper" gains. This is an UNREALISED INCOME.

AFAIK, a fund can only make distribution/pay dividend from its REALISED INCOME.

Thus, it can be said that, only a fund with healthy operating cash flows can make distributions. nod.gif

BUT

It does not necessarily mean that a fund with healthy operating cash flows is better than one without. Why?

Let me answer using an example/illustration...

XYZ Dividend Fund received lots of dividends during the financial year, and so it is in position to to declare dividend for the financial year. It did not dispose any of its equity holdings during the year. Its portfolio of investments registered a paper loss of -30% due to adverse market conditions.
NAV movement for a fund with such performance is likely to be negative, but it still can declare a dividend.

ABC Dynamic Growth Fund received zero dividend and just a little interest income during the financial year. It does not declare dividend for the financial year. Similarly to XYZ, ABC did not dispose any of its holdings during the year. Its portfolio of investments registered a paper gain of +18% due to its superior stock picking in the volatile market conditions.
NAV movement for such fund is likely to be positive i.e. NAV should have risen by about 18% during the past 12 months.

Get it? icon_rolleyes.gif
SUSPink Spider
post Jul 1 2012, 09:39 PM

Formerly known as Prince_Hamsap
********
Senior Member
16,872 posts

Joined: Jun 2011


QUOTE(desmond_fantasy @ Jul 1 2012, 09:32 PM)
Ya, bought it but like not moving...
U can dollar cost average it.
*
Not this AGAIN doh.gif

Bro, I humbly invite u to read the recent series of examples, illustrations and explanations on what dividends/distributions mean to investors notworthy.gif

Here, read from Page 119:
http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/690951/+2440

This post has been edited by Pink Spider: Jul 1 2012, 09:40 PM
SUSPink Spider
post Jul 2 2012, 11:53 AM

Formerly known as Prince_Hamsap
********
Senior Member
16,872 posts

Joined: Jun 2011


QUOTE(karhoe @ Jul 2 2012, 10:40 AM)
Really, please link me to the other thread, I will be absolutely interested to join the debate.

Well, you can easily see if the fund is showing return by seeing if the NAV/unit has grown. If the fund is showing negative return, you won't even be getting distribution...
*
Not necessarily. See my posts.
SUSPink Spider
post Jul 2 2012, 01:27 PM

Formerly known as Prince_Hamsap
********
Senior Member
16,872 posts

Joined: Jun 2011


QUOTE(j.passing.by @ Jul 2 2012, 12:53 PM)
oh, more people is joining my personal boycott campaign...  smile.gif

Pink Spider got the link in previous page... the debate was over when I called it kindergarten stuff and another poster got upset.  tongue.gif
forgot to add... well done on the long post yesterday.  smile.gif

Cheers. Happy investing, everyone. Till we meet again.
j.passing.by is just passing by...
*
I've nothing against PM or any other UTC for that matter, but I believe that we investors should have informed knowledge of UT. icon_idea.gif
SUSPink Spider
post Jul 2 2012, 02:36 PM

Formerly known as Prince_Hamsap
********
Senior Member
16,872 posts

Joined: Jun 2011


QUOTE(karhoe @ Jul 2 2012, 02:32 PM)
I'm aware that there could be negative return due to unrealised losses, but my point was whether there's any difference to distribute or not to, (I guess tax credit is the only one benefit)
*
Going forward, this reason would be no longer relevant cos more and more companies are distributing tax-exempt dividends nowadays. nod.gif
SUSPink Spider
post Jul 3 2012, 06:00 PM

Formerly known as Prince_Hamsap
********
Senior Member
16,872 posts

Joined: Jun 2011


QUOTE(wongmunkeong @ Jul 3 2012, 04:12 PM)
Please refer to:
http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/690951/+2380 onwards

Heheh - repeated umteenth time at that link.. and recently too, thus, don't let it go to waste biggrin.gif
*
Wong Sifu, we are "killing" all those "dividend salesmen" blush.gif
SUSPink Spider
post Jul 4 2012, 01:27 PM

Formerly known as Prince_Hamsap
********
Senior Member
16,872 posts

Joined: Jun 2011


I can sense another lecture of "what is dividend/distribution" coming doh.gif
SUSPink Spider
post Jul 4 2012, 01:33 PM

Formerly known as Prince_Hamsap
********
Senior Member
16,872 posts

Joined: Jun 2011


QUOTE(kueyteowlou @ Jul 4 2012, 01:32 PM)
hmmm.. may I know where to search unit trust fund portfolio?

which counter are they investing? and what are they doing? etc etc
*
monthly fact sheet

but it only shows their MAJOR/BIGGEST holdings

for full list, have to refer to annual/interim report
SUSPink Spider
post Jul 4 2012, 02:53 PM

Formerly known as Prince_Hamsap
********
Senior Member
16,872 posts

Joined: Jun 2011


QUOTE(Violet Ling @ Jul 4 2012, 02:39 PM)
yes i want switch because of distribution. i kinda beginner in this. so it is a wise thing to do?
lets say my fund A got RM10k with NAV 0.2500 , after distribution how much i get? assume the gross distribution is 2 cent..
*
NOT THIS AGAIN laugh.gif doh.gif

pls read the link given by kparam shakehead.gif
SUSPink Spider
post Jul 4 2012, 02:56 PM

Formerly known as Prince_Hamsap
********
Senior Member
16,872 posts

Joined: Jun 2011


QUOTE(wongmunkeong @ Jul 4 2012, 02:54 PM)
see - told U so tongue.gif
sorry ar Mods, 1 liner only
*
some PM agents must be cursing us now brows.gif
SUSPink Spider
post Jul 4 2012, 03:16 PM

Formerly known as Prince_Hamsap
********
Senior Member
16,872 posts

Joined: Jun 2011


QUOTE(kueyteowlou @ Jul 4 2012, 03:14 PM)
hmm.gif

any ideas where to get them?
*
WEBSITE mad.gif vmad.gif
SUSPink Spider
post Jul 4 2012, 06:39 PM

Formerly known as Prince_Hamsap
********
Senior Member
16,872 posts

Joined: Jun 2011


QUOTE(kueyteowlou @ Jul 4 2012, 06:32 PM)
sorry for the noob questions..

I didn't see any holding details on the report...

mind to enlighten me which session should I browse through ?
rclxub.gif  rclxub.gif
*
Fund Reports > Fund Review

See those PDF links?

I'm not a PM user/agent, took me less than 1 minit to see them shakehead.gif

Again, u r not going to see the full list, only the major holdings. Only inside the annual report u can see the full list.
SUSPink Spider
post Jul 4 2012, 06:54 PM

Formerly known as Prince_Hamsap
********
Senior Member
16,872 posts

Joined: Jun 2011


QUOTE(debbieyss @ Jul 4 2012, 06:45 PM)
If client's portfolio is not performing, agent's commission will be lesser when the client sells the fund. Since dividend fund is not something profitable then why would the agents introducing these funds to clients?
*
1st, your writing is seriously wrong.

There is a difference between a DIVIDEND FUND and a Dividend-PAYING Fund

A Dividend Fund invests in high dividend-yielding equities
A Dividend-paying fund has as its objective, to distribute most if not all of its income to its unitholders

I presume u are talking about the latter...

Well, at least the client has BOUGHT the funds, commission is pocketed when the client buys, no? hmm.gif

Not all dividend-paying funds are bad.
Similarly, the fact that a fund can pay regular dividends does not necessarily mean that the fund is a strong performer.

Obviously u have not read the recent discussions at Fund Investment Corner. doh.gif

Please spend some time to read from Page 119 onwards, any question, ask. wink.gif


Added on July 4, 2012, 7:03 pmA UT investor who monitors and tracks his portfolio will see that dividends are pointless.

It is those passive UT investors who BELIEVED that dividends are a "bonus", "additional gain", "weath enhancement" etc etc etc.

Why?

I illustrate and example of the latter...

- Ah Beng invested RM10,000 in PB Growth Fund.

- Ah Beng never track and monitor his investment.

- 11 months later, his account value actually shot up to RM11,500. But he won't know cos he never go and check his units x NAV price.

- Month 12, dividend is declared. Ah Beng elected to receive dividends in the form of cash payment.

- Distribution is paid. Ah Beng received a cheque for RM1,000 rclxm9.gif

- His account value is now RM10,500.

Dividend or not, at Month 12, Ah Beng's investment is already worth RM11,500.

Dividend - RM10,500 in units + RM1,000 in cash on hand = RM11,500
No dividend - RM11,500 all in units

FAHAM KA??? sweat.gif

This post has been edited by Pink Spider: Jul 4 2012, 07:03 PM
SUSPink Spider
post Jul 4 2012, 08:05 PM

Formerly known as Prince_Hamsap
********
Senior Member
16,872 posts

Joined: Jun 2011


QUOTE(debbieyss @ Jul 4 2012, 07:48 PM)
Pinkie and Mr. Wong, thanks for replying. Yes, I was referring to the dividend-paying fund, sorry for not able to specify it. Well, I have read the previous pages but it doesn't mention what I wanted to know.

If one chooses to reinvest, he/she could have bought more units at lower NAV, which is also a way to leverage down the price that he/she bought earlier on.
*
That statement is flawed and very wrong. shakehead.gif

Aiyo forgot to add on something doh.gif

Refer back to my earlier example...

Dividend or not, at Month 12, Ah Beng's investment is already worth RM11,500.

Dividend - RM10,500 in units + RM1,000 in cash on hand = RM11,500
Dividend REINVESTED - RM11,500 all in units
No dividend - RM11,500 all in units

Why can't u comprehend the many examples and illustrations given? rclxub.gif

BEFORE dividend, u have 4 pieces of moon cakes, totalling 200g x 4 = 800g
AFTER dividend, your 4 pieces of moon cakes are cut into quarters each, making 16 pieces. 16 pieces x 50g = 800g
PLEASE UNDERSTAND THIS ANALOGY

Dividend only makes your holdings become smaller in value, and at the same time "giving" u more units. At the end it's back to zero... sweat.gif

It's exactly like, u own 50% in ABC Berhad.
ABC Berhad has net assets of RM100m, which included RM10m cash.
So, ur stake in ABC Berhad is worth RM100m x 50% = RM50m
If tomorrow the Board of Directors decide to pay out a dividend of RM10m, u will get cash of RM10m x 50% = RM5m
And your stake in ABC Berhad will become RM90m x 50% = RM45m
How much u OWN now? RM45m in shares and RM5m in cash, total = RM50m
Then u decide to reinvest into the company (and assuming the other shareholders do the same)
The net assets of ABC Berhad will now go up to RM90m + RM10m = RM100m
And u own RM100m x 50% = RM50m now

Dividend in unit trust is just like that!!!

I need to see a heart specialist sweat.gif

This post has been edited by Pink Spider: Jul 4 2012, 08:07 PM

4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0601sec    0.54    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 02:33 PM