Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 AIMST or Taylors Pharmacy?

views
     
cckkpr
post Aug 3 2011, 02:23 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,518 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
Lecturers in Taylors should be better as options are more in KL though it could be pretty competitive.

Generally, colleges(those better ones) in KL provide much better programmes compared with those out of town.

The pioneer batches in AIMST could be good but the fact is most of the contract lecturers left at the expiry of the contract and its not easy to get good replacement as its way out of town.
cckkpr
post Aug 3 2011, 05:12 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,518 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
QUOTE(fightingbee @ Aug 3 2011, 03:21 PM)
Thx for d opinions.I personally prefer Taylors more since i hv more confidence with d lecturers thr. smile.gif however AIMST is accreditated by mqa and its far cheaper(but its too far from my hometown as well sad.gif )..while Taylors B.pharm prog is not yet accreditatated..i was wondering whether d graduates r eligible for registration with Pharmacy Board of Malaysia?
*
No problems with accreditation. All approved courses will be accredited, the fact is for some of them, the first batch of graduates are not out yet.

If you want to consider more reputable universities, consider Monash, Nottingham and IMU for pharmacy.
cckkpr
post Aug 12 2011, 04:14 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,518 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
There is always the issue of getting good lecturers and profs for universities located out of town and more so in remote areas. This is being made more acute with universities in the Klang Valley area expanding their choice of courses and making the recruitment of teaching staff very competitive.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0236sec    1.01    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 05:36 AM