guys, below are my rig specs.. can it run for bf3 ?

AMD PHENOM II X3 720
KINGSTON DDR3 1333 2gb x 2
palit gtx 260
MSI 770-C45
640gb WD
win 7 ultimate 64 bit


i hope i can run bf3, i pre-ordered with pbbseller..

Not sure if this has been posted, but the following analysis should help you decide building your rig. It covers the beta graphics settings as well as the performance of different cards on various settings. Mind you it's by nvidia so they would obviously champion their cards - and maybe even overestimating some figures. But for the 460 which i use, they're right on the money. The card performs more or less what they've stated, on those very same settings.

http://www.geforce.com/Optimize/Guides/bat...rformance-guide

because crysis 2 is running on DX9 mode by default, DX11 has to be enabled by patches

thats why you can run max on crysis 2, if on DX11 it's another story dude...

crysis 2 has lower requirements, my fps was 60 constant on crysis 2

i think in beta, destruction not so overwhelm
and theres a bug when u run into the hole, suddenly it suck u down XD

perhaps for final release, more destructions, and prepare for more lagging!!!

i may buying 6870 only if requirement not so extreme for high setting (not full 1080px still ok for me)
currently use HD4770, running all medium with 1600px only
not bad fps at caspian borders, 64ppls

This post has been edited by MjMax15: Oct 1 2011, 05:20 PM

your processor gonna suffer a bit. My previous x3 710 suffered bad fps in BC2. In bf3 needless to say. lol

Can Palit GTX 460 supports BF3 in medium with no problem?

I think it should. BTW anyone here tried it out with a 5850? If got then can post some results?

Intel i7 920
6gb ram
gtx 260
win 7 64 bit

I just tried bf3, everything low, everything off, playing @ 1920 x 1080; I don't think I got to play it @ 60fps.

Even though everything was set to low, the graphics was still good.

Sigh... need a new GPU already if I wanna play this at a higher settings and smoother frame rate.

This post has been edited by JuzJoe: Oct 2 2011, 12:17 AM

i'm hovering around 35fps with 5850 (99% load) and q6600@3.4ghz (~70% load) at 1920x1080 (BF3: auto setting)...thought my gc was bottleneck
it play very smooth even at 30fps.

i played bc2 with tis spec.
goodings yo.. with a next to maximum performance.. no lag, all perfect..

maybe bf3, gona get bit low performance.

i shopped and the boss assembled gtx560 ti twin frozr II for me instead of my request of msi gtx560 ti hawk, without any extra cost($which he said the former costs SGD$22 more)
but...how is the performance of the card? will it be almost the same?

hawk is more of performances
but twin fozr II is very good IMHO,
its have one of the nicest cooler i seen in GTX series
aside then DirectCuII
you won't see any differences
and don't worry its also can support BF3 nicely

use ultra settings nearly same fps as high settings, play few games later, getting massive cpu lag... end up restart bf3 to fix

have to use high setting play -.-

ultra settings is not in the beta, so you set ultra = high.

err... what?

The last time I've checked, Hawk (aka Twin Frozr III) cost more than Twin Frozr II.

Yup HAWK should cost more than Twin Frozr II.

DELETED

This post has been edited by sai86: Oct 6 2011, 05:01 PM

cmon..cmon...
which one is gooding yo?

6950

or

560 Ti

if u use AMD, then go ATI
if u use intel, by all means.. nvidia