i took DIBS -Ambank , did anyone know the jaya megah pay to the bank already ? Ambank told me developer havent pay for the interest. but the due date is 1st April. Who bear the late payment charged? 

yup i check it online too... outstanding amount of rm56++. late payment interest should be bare by developers under DIBS...

boss, how to register and check online for ambank? need to go bank counter register first?

just now i checked with ambank staff. they said that it is our responsibility ( borrower) will bear the charged , we have to monitor account and to notify the developer to remit the payment in advance before the grace period or to notify the bank if the billing advice is not received. so anyone knows who is the person in charged of developer to make the payment? 

Me too. Rcv ltr today ask to remit payment within 14 days. Shud v ask lawyer or developer?

Bt I can't see any cc to developer. Mine hv to pay 60 sumthing. Developer knw hw much to pay? I hv no idea.. this deal is between us wif developer, I blif bank won't knw anything as long as they rcv money enuf. Perhaps need to ask developer more bout it lo

I think there are 2 types of late interest:

1) late payment from bank to devloper : bank or purchaser needs to pay to devloper within 3 weeks from date of billing. If late then devloper will charge d late payment interest to purchaser. Tis one sure purchaser to pay.

2) late payment of bank interest : tis one is either pay by devloper or purchaser to bank. As long as someone pay  then bank ok already.

visit the site just now, still just in piling completion stage only.

Hi,

Amara progress has been worry some to me. I went to the site as I cannot find any latest update online.

They just complete the piling, below is the panomaric image of the site.

[attachmentid=2952031]

Really hope progress to be very well after this.

Regards

1 year for piling is not consider super slow...as long as they continue have progress and not abandone the project then is ok...

1 year complete piling is on schedule for a 3 years construction of a condo...

Ok thanks!

Just went to the site, updated photo as below(view from main door)

Do anyone here have the same issue as me here?
The issue is that Kim realty claimed that I'm not eligible for the iPad claim, in fact I have fulfill all the criteria as mentioned when I purchased that property. I did rushed everything within the time frame and got a loan from CIMB bank. Well, now they are saying I did not fulfill a criteria which is NOT GETTING loan from their panel BANKERS. CIMB was one of the panel bank in fact, but they now claimed has to be one particular branch only. I'm so sure that I wasn't told about this clause b4. I did submitted few panel banks that stationed there but the took so long to come back with approval whereelse in the same time I submitted to a banker from my other fren who recommended came out with approval fastest. I took up the l

I gt d same point wif u. So worry den go think bout completed project, y wan to make urself difficult worry here worry there?

KUALA LUMPUR: A MASSIVE rally is expected to be held in Batu Caves on Friday to pressure the authorities to stop the construction of a 29-storey condominium in the limestone hill area.
The protest, to be led by Sri Mahamariamman Batu Caves Temple committee president Datuk R. Nadarajah, is expected to attract about 100,000 people.
"This is a matter that concerns the public deeply and I am taking this issue seriously."
He encouraged the public to take part and voice their frustrations against the new development.
The peaceful protest is scheduled to begin at 10am.
Nadarajah agreed with MIC president Datuk Seri G. Palanivel who had on Sunday said the Selangor government and the relevant authorities should immediately halt the building of the condominium.
Palanivel had also urged the Minerals and Geoscience Department to conduct a study of the entire Batu Caves area.
The issue was brought to light after registration for the high-rise was recently opened on property websites.
The serviced 474 unit-condominium is advertised to be located "a stone's throw" from Batu Caves.
Nadarajah had also sent several letters of protest mainly to the Selangor menteri besar and state exco members Ronnie Liu and Dr Xavier Jayakumar.
"If they do not respond by next Monday, I will be forced to seek further action," he said, not discounting a legal action.
Liu and Selayang Municipal Council president Datuk Zainal Abidin Aala will be visiting the site at noon today.
Meanwhile, Universiti Malaya Geology department head Associate Professor Datuk Mohamad Ali Hassan said a study must be conducted to determine the lithology of rocks in the vicinity before any development could take place.
"Depending on the metamorphism of the rock, it can be determined if the limestones at Batu Caves are fragile and overburdened.
Ali also said Batu Caves was a historical and religious site which needed to be preserved rather than rushed into urban modernisation.
Batu Caves Zone 15 residents' committee council member N. Gopalan Krishnan Rajoo also said many residents objected to the new development.
He said it was a high-density area, especially since the temple was situated nearby.
"Parking is difficult and traffic can get congested. It is dangerous to continue with the project and there are plenty of residential areas with a school nearby.
"We do not want to risk doing further damage to the hills which can be hazardous to the public."
The developer, Dolomite Corporation Berhad, could not be reached for comment.
Dolomite Industries Co Sdn Bhd had owned a limestone quarry at Batu Caves, which had a lease until 1991, but was shut down in the mid-1980s following pressure from various parties.

this R. Nadarajah fella alwiz like this only la... mayb he did not receive any kickbacks from the developer or what.. i hav booked mine n will sign S n P this sat... i m not bothered bout this fella

Two of my clients made a booking on this property recently & they're not bothered much by this news.

The way I see this issue is as follows;

1. Politically motivated - BN approved this project in Y2007 hence why is MIC raising this issues now when they should have done so in Y2007.

2. If the high structure of statue is going to be destabilized by the construction then either

a) there shouldn't be any high rises in this area (including Amara etc) or

b) the construction of the statute is not done properly (maybe that's what the temple person is worried about since it'll spell trouble to him later on)

3. Some level of interest in the land owned by this developer since the temple committee can occupy it at a cheaper cost if the project gets canceled & pressure the developer to sell it to them.

4. Modern construction methods to be used means less intrusion impact to tall structures eg. since KLCC has seen so many high rises being built around it despite being the icon of Malaysia in the recent years.

Of course investments such as this one comes with risks so it boils down to what's your risk appetite & strategy.

Cheers,

HH