QUOTE(amduser @ Jul 24 2011, 01:02 AM)
that must be the 1/60 WZModel Kits Gundam & Mecha Modelling Thread V21
Model Kits Gundam & Mecha Modelling Thread V21
|
|
Jul 24 2011, 01:07 AM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
183 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 26 2011, 11:23 AM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
183 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
QUOTE(amduser @ Jul 26 2011, 10:17 AM) surprisingly enamel paint is not very popular because it tends to dry on thicker (also takes longer to dry) than other base paints. a lot of people go more for acrylic or lacquer paints. i remember seeing acrylic and lacquer paints at time machine, but not enamel ones. I think AFHobby has them. Even so, black enamel paint is a lot more popular than other colours so don't be disheartened if you manage to find only black enamels. |
|
|
Jul 26 2011, 11:32 AM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
183 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
QUOTE(StarGhazzer @ Jul 26 2011, 07:32 AM) Whoaaaa.... more great stuff coming out soon.... Here's what I think:JESTAAAAA. Pure sex. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Now that we have clearer pictures, more details are revealed: 1. Part swapping required for the shield to enable posing on the back or at the sides. Not fussed, since less moving parts mean less risk of saggy joints. 2. The shield has a handle and a hole. Can't see any pegs sticking out from the left forearm, but that additional black piece next to the two backpack-sheild connectors in the last pic might be it. 3. Two tone blue pieces provided. The lighter shade looks weird but likely due to photography flash. The Rezel's initial pictures looked weird too but the end product was quite accurate, unlike Angelo's Zulu which turned from purple to pink. 4. Can't see any part-swapping pieces for the visor, yet at the same time there aren't any pictures showing the visor being flipped downwards. I hope this feature is included otherwise it'd be blasphemous. 5. Two beams but only one sabre. Oh well... spare part. 6. Right forearm is indeed carrying clips hence the left hand can grab it and attach it to the carbine. Would have liked the clips to be attached to the right skirt armour, sabre storage on the right (so that left hand can grab and use it), and grenade launcher on left forearm. Makes more sense this way. Gonna preorder... hopefully HLJ got early-bird offer. Some interesting GPB kits: » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « 1. Beginning J Gundam looks the best among its variations. This time it's circles... X next perhaps? This is only a custom build but good to see the return of the traditional mouth vents although the unique beam V-fin deserves its place. Would have liked massive beam swords instead of solid blades. 2. Silver stripes for the white Sinanju. Looks more cohesive than the striking gold. I'd be fcked if they released this with the bazooka. I want the bazooka for my red Sinanju. Then again, being Bandai, they might just release this with a bazooka but NO beam rifle. Awesome mode for the forearm beam sabre compartment... Bandai why can't you do this for the original red Sinanju? 3. Custom Unicorn. Ugh. Ugly colour scheme. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « 1. Now we know where the beam sabres are stored. Those white stuff on the phallic shield ! Well there's only two... so maybe the other two are missiles. 2. Other than that, nothing out of the blue really. We've already seen how the Rezel transforms and the Delta Plus is not drastically different. 3. Hm... MG Delta Gundam maybe There's also a modded HG Aegis with a few RG Strike parts. Very fcking awesome indeed, but the transformation capabilities are unfortunately compromised due to the extended length of the legs and some modified joints. Lazy to link pics but they're there in Gundam Guy where all these came from. 1. Jesta looks really interesting, when the GM ECOAS version came out, I told myself the Jesta will look tonnes better. And it does. But I really hope they don't make the visor a part's swapping gimmick. 2. Beginning J - meh. The beginning gundams never really looked good to me because I guess they were never actually real mobile suits, just model kits 3. I love Sinanjus but I might just pass on the white one since I've already got the red HGUC one. Probably you're right, it wont have the beam rifle nor the beam axes it seems. Losing all those in exchange for movable beam sabre gimmick and bazooka...is it really worth it? 4. Bad colours on the Unicorn 5. The other two stuff on the shield are grenades I think. Delta plus, Rezel and Zeta all have the same or similar transformations. I still prefer the original Zeta. It was original and interesting then, now it's just gimmicky. And the rifle on the Delta Plus. Why is everything so thin? Looks like a damn anorexic MS. 6. I would like to see a Delta Gundam but it's a mobile suit variation so it may not come out. So I'd have to say a Hyaku Shiki 2.0 might be more likely (fingers crossed) |
|
|
Jul 26 2011, 01:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
183 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
QUOTE(amduser @ Jul 26 2011, 12:28 PM) friday gonna go TM to see if got anything to buy levelling thinner and retarder is usually used to make paint dry slower and more evenly. I'm not too sure but I believe when using lacquer paints and acrylic u will have issues with paint drying too fast leaving brushmarks, which is why ppl use retarder and levelling thinner. I havent had much experience with lacquer and acrylics but I think u can use levelling thinner for them. In fact you can even use water with acrylic paints. Can anyone else confirm?those paint normally around what price? acrylic and lacquer paint can use leveling thinner to thin it? i planning to get paint for panel line instead of panel marker and some nub mark touch up Added on July 26, 2011, 12:29 pm only postage for them, which is a problem for me since i'm not at home most of the time QUOTE(daydreaming @ Jul 26 2011, 01:35 PM) mmm so i think i need a pencil to draw the lines...and a knife to make the actual lines...then panel line those lines. hahaha. It would be good if u had some modelling tape (i think that's the term), it's basically something like a thick sticky tape you stick on the model to guide ur knife as u cut.ok, just my imagination. i think the difficulty is too high for me :T |
|
|
Jul 27 2011, 06:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
183 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
|
|
|
Jul 29 2011, 09:46 AM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
183 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
QUOTE(StarGhazzer @ Jul 29 2011, 08:23 AM) Jesus guys. Too much random chit-chat... not enough gunpla. Haih...I agree...no substance, just random chit chat. StarGhazzer, you might find this interesting, final images of the mG Delta PLus:Pure awesome. MG heaven. http://www.xiaot.com/vbbs/viewthread.php?t...&extra=page%3D1 » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Being a fan of the original Zeta, I must say I am disappointed they've stuck with the same transformation process for the Zeta, Delta Plus and Rezel (legs splayed out wide, head and arms in the middle). The only difference is probably the quality and sturdiness of the kit and the fact that the wings don't have to be flipped to the front. But I am pleased that in Wave Rider mode there is no visible head like the Epyon. Added on July 29, 2011, 9:48 am QUOTE(mf_yamato @ Jul 28 2011, 08:41 PM) I don't think the ground type is quite in scale to the Apsalus. If memory serves me right, the Apsalus was a monster compared to the gundam.This post has been edited by reehdus: Jul 29 2011, 09:48 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 29 2011, 03:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
183 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
QUOTE(General_Nic @ Jul 29 2011, 01:11 PM) cant blame them, even real Delta Plus transformation process is similar to Zeta in the animation It's a shame though. The Delta Plus was supposed to be based on the Delta Gundam (the original idea for Hyaku Shiki). I can see why the Rezel would copy the transformation of the Zeta as it was based on it. The Delta + however should be based on the Delta Gundam, which I feel should have had a different transformation from Zeta since it was technically a different gundam. In war terms of course it's most realistic and economical to build on the best working design you have. But in terms of mecha designers, it was not creative.this is because most transforming MS designs are based on Zeta it would be damn funny if Wing loses its shield then there'll be no transformation Speaking of not creative, I totally agree with how weird the Wing, Epyon and later series transformations are. One exception being the Aegis which I feel was pretty nice. |
|
|
Jul 29 2011, 08:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
183 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
QUOTE(StarGhazzer @ Jul 29 2011, 07:30 PM) Zeta's transformation is slightly different to Delta/Delta+ and Rezel. Yes, ur right, the transformation of the Rezel is similar to the Methuss (both of them even have the crotch hook). The directions the skirt armours and legs face are different yes, but why do all the suits have to drop their head into their chest and flip out the cockpit? Was there no other way to transform (although the Rezel transforms slightly differently I think)Delta transforms with its legs folded down and skirt armours twisted upwards and facing back. Zeta's legs go up while skirt armours face forward and can be used as beam cannons, which is indeed the case in the Z Plus variants. Rezel's transformation is more similar to the Delta's, although it is supposed to originate from the Methuss. The legs fold 180 degrees like the Methuss, yet the arms/shoulders rotate inwards like the Zeta/Delta. The Methuss's shoulders join together with the leg thrusters while the entire forearm is hidden in the legs. All similar, yet different and unique in their own ways. Watch this review and you'll see why Raider doesn't only look bad, the quality of the gunpla is also shabby. Raider is the most impractical EA gundam ever. Half of its weapons can't be used in MS mode so what's the point of turning into a robot? It's a glorified, transforming Dodai. That's all it is. |
|
|
Jul 31 2011, 11:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
183 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
QUOTE(nazrul90 @ Jul 31 2011, 10:49 AM) this i couldnt deny.. as a non-newtype pilot that use Ball can even pawn a Zaku this is the Delta Gundam:same goes to Acguy that can pawn Gundam Ground Type's head although later turn out lose for non UC, it is Flag Setsuna's custom(oh wait, he is an Innovator) oh well, i dont say from UC or non-UC cause i refer to Delta Plus are mistakenly as gundam unit.. heck, it doesnt have gundam name lol http://gundam.wikia.com/wiki/MSN-001_Delta_Gundam Delta Plus is a mass production prototype based on it. Just like Zeta plus is mass prod prototype based on Zeta. Added on July 31, 2011, 11:46 amPlease do not make the mistake of comparing UC suits to 00 suits...lol QUOTE(Impulse10 @ Jul 30 2011, 11:48 PM) This post has been edited by reehdus: Jul 31 2011, 11:47 AM |
|
|
Jul 31 2011, 01:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
183 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
QUOTE(nazrul90 @ Jul 31 2011, 12:28 PM) Delta Gundam doesnt exist psychically same with GP04G Gerbera Gundam(Zeon have illegal access Gerbera Gundam's data in Evolve) If u read the link, the Hyaku Shiki was supposed to be Delta Gundam, but due to technology limitations at the time, they could not build it thus the Hyaku Shiki was not transformable. The Delta Plus is simply based on the original design of the Delta Gundam, which they can make since the technology is now available. They are two different suits. The 'plus' annotation normally denotes a mass produced prototype based on a similar gundam design. I guess it should be the same as comparing Gerbera Tetra to Gerbera Gundam I suppose, but comparing the two versions of the RX-178 doesn't make sense as the AEUG MK-II is a repainted Titans MK-II. The AEUG did not build the MK-II.Delta Plus and Delta Gundam is different mobile suit right? it like comparing AEUG and TITANS RX-178 based on color Added on July 31, 2011, 1:12 pm QUOTE(amduser @ Jul 31 2011, 12:31 PM) looks like it is too heavy to even stand on its own (minus the 3 mini support stand), the mecha itself look like it gonna fall Those are fuel tanks I believe.but nice add on, what are those long white stick behind? nuke? This post has been edited by reehdus: Jul 31 2011, 01:13 PM |
|
|
Aug 3 2011, 08:59 AM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
183 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
Why does the thread pic keep changing?
|
|
|
Aug 5 2011, 01:12 AM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
183 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
QUOTE(nazrul90 @ Aug 5 2011, 01:06 AM) actually both also anime color accurate just HGUC need to touch up at some part btw wrong shield position for that HGUC ![]() Why do I still prefer the Hyaku Shiki? Source: http://blog.livedoor.jp/hacchaka/archives/51759454.html |
|
|
Aug 5 2011, 01:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
183 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
QUOTE(nazrul90 @ Aug 5 2011, 01:16 AM) or other way around? lolzAdded on August 5, 2011, 1:21 am QUOTE(nazrul90 @ Aug 5 2011, 01:16 AM) try paint Hyaku Shiki into Delta Plus color scheme The c-clip is just like in the Zeta 2.0, just to hold the shield in place during Wave Rider mode...should not be under undue stress I believe...potential break part spotted: http://livedoor.2.blogimg.jp/hacchaka/imgs/0/5/05d3957a.jpg the c-clip will break like MG 00 Qan T too This post has been edited by reehdus: Aug 5 2011, 01:21 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 5 2011, 10:21 AM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
183 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
QUOTE(nazrul90 @ Aug 5 2011, 02:34 AM) im really sure that part will break after try to pull shield back for MS mode i've tried maybe 3 times so far and i'm really sure it didn't break for my zeta. but the zeta clip is thicker i guess.oh well, im skipping this.. will get HGUC instead(no complicated and fragile part, simple transform mode QUOTE(MyKy44 @ Aug 5 2011, 10:14 AM) agreed |
|
|
Aug 5 2011, 01:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
183 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
|
|
|
Aug 7 2011, 12:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
183 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
|
|
|
Aug 10 2011, 01:53 AM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
183 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
QUOTE(ascentic @ Aug 9 2011, 01:17 PM) yeah .. sure bro.. It's free @ first.. but u know typical human/collectors.. the price can go way high!.. and at the end of the day is either u want it or just forget it Is it a ploy to raise the price of the ARF by first offering 'free gifts' at raised price then removing the gift and maintaining the price?General_nic.. I got 2 of the katana.. QUOTE(Tiger I @ Aug 9 2011, 03:46 PM) That's child's play compared to this:QUOTE(daydreaming @ Aug 9 2011, 05:30 PM) You don't need to do everything Z does. Z always mentions he hates building the bases that come with the gundam etc because it takes up space but i don't see why if you've paid for it you wouldn't build it. So if you've got nothing against the anime-accurate pink beams, why don't you keep it that way?QUOTE(calcilis @ Aug 9 2011, 06:30 PM) Lol...nice job...but would be better if the saber was in the other hand...would fit the slice betterQUOTE(ascentic @ Aug 9 2011, 10:56 PM) Sorry It's just the KATANA sahaja Stay away from him. It's not worth it.well, today I was really quite shocked to see this in my PM... as I was trying to buy something from a seller in the flee market!... "(OOO) Re: Assembled Gundam, Today, 03:57 PM Group: New Member Posts: 0 Status: Offline Joined: Jul 2011 -OK RM100 can but when we COD make sure you take it for RM100. No more bargaining regardless of the condition." Really Feel like "WTF.. what attitude is this!.. never tell me much about the condition than let me know this.. trying to be a joker?" QUOTE(golbeza @ Aug 10 2011, 12:17 AM) next time i'll make it really really really really small Add this to my list of MG kits using the Exia/00/Qanta recycled design that Bandai is making money off. So that makes 5 different kits of Setsuna's gundams. Not bad Bandai.anyone up for a MG OO Raiser Trans Am mode? i know i'm not G-News: Premium Bandai Hobby Shop Online MG 00 Raiser Trans-Am Mode! Start Orders from 11 August 2011 till TBD Price: 6,825 Yen Contents: Runners in Gloss injection parts reproducing Trans-Am Mode GN Drive with Red LED (No.1 LED included) Stickers Dry Decals Manual source: gunjap » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Aug 10 2011, 09:54 AM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
183 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
http://bandai-hobby.net/site/gunpla_recipe02.html
http://bandai-hobby.net/site/gunpla_recipe01.html instructions on how to build the MSes that come in the postcards for RGs |
|
|
Aug 11 2011, 02:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
183 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
QUOTE(StarGhazzer @ Aug 11 2011, 12:29 PM) I'm starting to think that there might be varying qualities in Bandai's ABS joints. you can try coating the joints in superglue/UHU glue to thicken them. The Zeta 2.0 I'm currently building unfortunately suffers from overexcited transformation syndrome where the user transforms each part repeatedly as he builds it. The UHU helps.My HGUC GP02's ABS joints are stiff as heck, same with the RX78 ver2.0; yet the ones on my MKII ver2.0 are appalling. It can't even hold its rifle properly and the elbows are flabby. QUOTE(dfcloud @ Aug 11 2011, 12:46 PM) is hlj is enough for me to search for any released model kit or is there some other website with a more complete list? you can try 1999.co.jp/eng/gundam. It has multiple photos of the kit, box, runners and even scans of the manualQUOTE(ooiwbng @ Aug 11 2011, 02:30 PM) wth does that mean?The Delta Plus seems to have gotten a scathing review from Syd @ gaijin-gunpla who cites its inability to stand up properly and lack of additional weapons for the low score (55.7/100): http://www.gaijin-gunpla.com/mg-delta-plus-review-55-7/ Edit: I also notice that the Delta plus comes with 2 extra parts meant for transformation to make the end result more stable...tsk tsk...naughty Bandai. But if it helps with stability, why not? This post has been edited by reehdus: Aug 11 2011, 02:47 PM |
|
|
Aug 11 2011, 03:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
183 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0490sec
0.34
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 26th November 2025 - 07:02 PM |