Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 TD05h - 18g boost kick in late at 5k rpm, help me on my campro bolt-on turbo setup

views
     
stormlcc
post Jul 9 2011, 01:43 PM

I can't control my G-FORCE addiction!!!
******
Senior Member
1,954 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
18g, this is the problem, change to 16g and it'll spool faster but not by much (1-1.5k rpm difference i think). 18g is meant for 2.0 engines, even 1.8 will suffer huge lags. and u r boosting 0.4 bars, why? 18g needs high boost in order to function properly, it's hp orientated not response.

trust me, get the 16g and boost at least 0.6 bars, u already have lowered compression and a highly tunable ECU, a higher boost won't blow your engine. and 0.6 bars isn't really considered high boost, it's just.......standard

and whoever says short runners aren't good for turbo they don't know what they r talking about, i'll tell u, for response, THE SHORTER THE BETTER. Same like the intercooler piping, u don't want cuti-cuti malaysia piping that goes all around the world, it's a waste of metal, if i have a choice, i'll place my intercooler on top of my engine (like subaru did, they can because they use flat engine).....

and your camshaft is purely for high rpm performance, low to mid rpm will suffer like hell, if u want response change to other camshaft, it's no use if your boost kick in at so high rpm but your power band is so narrow

This post has been edited by stormlcc: Jul 9 2011, 02:00 PM
stormlcc
post Jul 10 2011, 01:41 PM

I can't control my G-FORCE addiction!!!
******
Senior Member
1,954 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(ThunderGod_Cid @ Jul 10 2011, 03:03 AM)
agree with you, +1 smile.gif. But I dont understand the bold part bro
*
turbo is not like NA engine, it doesn't need "air pressure" or "back pressure" or whatever pressure to perform because the entire system is like a giant air sucking machine, so u need to prevent anything to "block" or "slow" air from going into the combustion chamber and going out from it to the exhaust, therefore, the shorter the better, no matter it is air intake or output
stormlcc
post Jul 10 2011, 06:54 PM

I can't control my G-FORCE addiction!!!
******
Senior Member
1,954 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(ThunderGod_Cid @ Jul 10 2011, 02:51 PM)
Then why would people go through the hassle of making long runners? I personally thought it was all about giving the exhaust gasses time to pick up speed and velocity before it enters and turns the turbine wheel, hence some people actually relocating the turbine as far away as possible from the engine head with as long runners as possible, naming it 'remote turbo'.

Short huge intake manifolds will give you good top and and feed the engine with all the air it needs, but kill just a little bit of bottom end.

As for exhaust, I may be wrong. You reckon?


Added on July 10, 2011, 2:52 pmIndeed it's a blower concept where equal length runners are not as important in an FI car as having equal length runners in an N/A engine.
*
well long runners r used mostly for NA cars. there r tons of debate going on whether to use short or long runners for "everyday" turbo engines and most of them agrees on one thing, the shorter, the better for turbo, because there's less restriction, and less restriction makes good throttle response. And most of them agrees that whether it's short or long runner, it won't effect the spool time of the turbo by much, because the turbo's spool time is largely effected by how MUCH (volume) exhaust gas is available and the in/ex dimensions and materials used for/of the turbo itself. This debate has been going on for centuries and until now there is NO CONCLUSION AT ALL, some say orange but some say apples and these guys whether their apple or oranges, they r all professionals working with great tuning companies.

Because turbo engines are totally unlike NA engines (turbo setup is much more complicated), no one actually bothers to prove which one is better because there r too many variables, like the diameter of the piping, the setup of the engine, the design of the bending of the piping and so on, all can effect the end result. and for tuning companies, they always take the same engine to test their products (short vs long intake runners for example) but they NEVER announce / publish their findings (due to p&c), they only SELL whichever product they find "more beneficial", which for us, doesn't actually know all the facts like do the long runners actually make turbo spool faster? but they sell the short runners for "maximum performance"....! I do know this as a fact, VW, they make some excellent turbo engines, and their intake manifold are designed to have both the benefit of both long and short runners, for low end torque AND high end power at the same time, and tuning companies also copied the original design but made it SHORTER for.........."maximum performance" whatever this means....

All I know is from my experience, I CAN'T say u r wrong though because who knows (literally)? All we have are some apples and oranges from those experts, and all that we can do is trial and error

and where is TS anyway? from what i know, the main culprit is the 18g turbo which is TOO BIG for your engine, change that to a smaller version and it's all good

This post has been edited by stormlcc: Jul 10 2011, 07:07 PM
stormlcc
post Jul 11 2011, 09:47 AM

I can't control my G-FORCE addiction!!!
******
Senior Member
1,954 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(ThunderGod_Cid @ Jul 11 2011, 01:52 AM)
lol. time for me to do more reading. And crap, my ex manifold is in the midst of being fabricated as I type this =.=!

indeed the diameter of the runners will affect the spool-up period. small runners the air travels fast, spool up fast... but once you reach your top end, it suffocates. As for big runners, spool up is slow, or boost comes in alter (whichever), but the top end is definitely there
*
looks like this thread is a 2 person discussion since TS gone with the wind. what car and engine r u using anyway?
stormlcc
post Jul 11 2011, 04:24 PM

I can't control my G-FORCE addiction!!!
******
Senior Member
1,954 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
4efte is good enough, putting TD04 in it? in what chassis? i once thought i'll put this engine in my toyota LE, but at last decided to just go with the blacktop conversion since the halfcut price is the same (auto gb)
stormlcc
post Jul 12 2011, 11:50 AM

I can't control my G-FORCE addiction!!!
******
Senior Member
1,954 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(ThunderGod_Cid @ Jul 12 2011, 01:42 AM)
scared of lag as well wink.gif. Did a hybrid ct9/1. Charade g200 smile.gif. The LE would be much better off with a black top
*
the LE is for everyday use for my wife, so both engines also a good choice, 1.3 4efte don't have much problem using RON95, blacktop can't use pure RON95, need to mix half RON97. but the FC really good on blacktop, sometimes can travel 9 days in 1 full tank, which is only RM60 (mix 50-50)

your hybrid turbo is from what turbo? still making the manifold?
stormlcc
post Jul 12 2011, 03:24 PM

I can't control my G-FORCE addiction!!!
******
Senior Member
1,954 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(ThunderGod_Cid @ Jul 12 2011, 12:23 PM)
compressor = ct12b from 1kz land cruiser
turbine housing - ct9 stock, rebored to suit the comp wheel and housing of the 12b

manifold still in the make.

As for your blacktop, can't detune it with unichip/adaptronic?
Buy a smaller ball bearing charger wink.gif
*
of course can, but don't have time to go KL, install the ECU and dyno tune (which will take a whole day), and ipoh don't have tuning shops..... sweat.gif

anyway, beside unichip and adaptronic, do u know any other piggyback good for tuning to use RON95?


Added on July 12, 2011, 3:29 pm
QUOTE(benjoe @ Jul 12 2011, 12:51 PM)
hahaa.. even GT auto also poison me to take the ball bearing turbine..
*
at last got reply from TS. of course they want u to take the ball bearing, same like me last time when i go there for tuning...haha, few years back they highly recommend the GT3540 for my engine


Added on July 12, 2011, 3:33 pm
QUOTE(benjoe @ Jul 12 2011, 12:13 PM)
wah.. long reply edi.. biggrin.gif
btw.. boosted at 1bar.. maybe the 18g is the culprit.. the turbo is too big for the engine i think.. maybe i shud put back the TD04hl..

can i do something for the 16g..? or shud buy a new one..?

thanks for all the comment..
*
u should change back to TD04hl, since it works for u, just boost high a bit since u lowered the compression already, your 0.4 bar standard boost don't have any feel, 0.6 bar is quite ok for stock internals

u got a 16g? or u meant 18g? if u got extra cash to spend, u can always hybrid the turbo, go ask some experts like tong turbo, they know how to make a big turbo spool fast

This post has been edited by stormlcc: Jul 12 2011, 03:34 PM
stormlcc
post Jul 12 2011, 04:35 PM

I can't control my G-FORCE addiction!!!
******
Senior Member
1,954 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
from my knowledge, i think the TD04HL is the largest turbo in the TD04 series, correct me if i'm wrong. even subaru imprezzas (not the STI version) uses this, it's good up to around 250hp on flywheel on high boost on a 2litre motor, so TS u got lots of potential using the TD04HL, no need TD05 which is just a waste of revs

previously u dyno how many horses and torque u got from the TD04? and what rev achieves max boost?

This post has been edited by stormlcc: Jul 12 2011, 04:37 PM
stormlcc
post Jul 12 2011, 04:51 PM

I can't control my G-FORCE addiction!!!
******
Senior Member
1,954 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(benjoe @ Jul 12 2011, 04:48 PM)
TD04hl
boost: 0.4bar
HP: 170hp
Torque: 220nm
boost full: 3.5k rpm

TD05h
boost: 0.97bar
HP: 230hp
Torque: 226nm
boost full @ rev cut..

both dyno done at GT Auto..
*
wow, u already boost to 1bar on TD05, so why don't just boost the TD04 to 1bar? i'm almost certain u'll achieve similar figures much earlier on the revs. even if the hp is lower than 230hp, your full boost comes (much) earlier, the car will be more fun to drive

This post has been edited by stormlcc: Jul 12 2011, 04:55 PM
stormlcc
post Jul 12 2011, 04:57 PM

I can't control my G-FORCE addiction!!!
******
Senior Member
1,954 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(benjoe @ Jul 12 2011, 04:55 PM)
ya.. im thinking like that also..
mybe i'll revert back to td04hl and just sell the td05.. hhaha..

btw.. is there any way where we can cover the power drop at hi-rpm if using td04..??
*
u already got hi-cams, cam gears, good ECU, what about your exhaust side? u ask gt-auto better, they r much more qualified than me
stormlcc
post Jul 12 2011, 05:19 PM

I can't control my G-FORCE addiction!!!
******
Senior Member
1,954 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(ThunderGod_Cid @ Jul 12 2011, 05:12 PM)
thumbup.gif i like


Added on July 12, 2011, 5:13 pm
you prolly want to have bigger sized IC and exhaust pipes, and also oversized throttle body to compensate the amount of air going in and out of the engine since you already have cams


Added on July 12, 2011, 5:15 pm

thinking thinking think think think you cant use emanage. So... another alternative other than adaptronic and unichip would be AEM's fuel/ignition controller. not sure if its compatible or not though. I heard it's got more tuning points than emanage's 16x16
*
emanage incompatible with blacktop? how bout 1jz-gte....? i asked because my next project involving this

hey thundergod, i saw you r selling drift gauges, the boost meter only has psi values? no bar values? looks damn cool!

This post has been edited by stormlcc: Jul 12 2011, 05:36 PM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0183sec    0.47    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 12:05 AM