this thread proves that some people in /k/ doesnt read.
or maybe they're just illiterate? hmm

some of them Ignorant and a Blind Hater.

and also a typical Malaysian.

this is for safety reason, in case bridge collapse it'll float

fail + 1

ok lah

at least twin tower still standing firm

----

This post has been edited by e36.hartge: Jul 7 2011, 05:37 PM

LOL... lightweight technology...!!!

wtf this tered full of bodoh people want bash malaysia only. go fcuken read laa. not entire bridge was made from poly


btw, sos is 404.

This post has been edited by ~min~: Jul 7 2011, 05:40 PM

clerk of work makan rasuah. MACC kasi tangkap JKR

Nevertheless this isnt the end result of millions of dollars spent which we were hoping for.with those holes, its bad to look at and gives bad image to the tourists.
Those holes and cracked walls should not of happened this fast

This post has been edited by FrostLance: Jul 7 2011, 05:42 PM

MALAYSIA KE ARAH KUASA BESAR DUNIA!

This post has been edited by super_evil_alien: Jul 7 2011, 05:42 PM

question: are those brown kaler suppork thingy made of reinforced concrete?

ayam dunno these shit ... ayam no civil anjingliar

This post has been edited by spursfan: Jul 7 2011, 05:45 PM

When I replied, I din see the cracked concrete. That I agreed is serious but on the poly deco, it's just a deco unless as you said or proven that deco can cost millions, than it will be interesting

Those deco is so common mah..Even those Malls using poly as faked rocks & etc..Dirt cheap to replace & re-decorate accordinmg to festivals...The cracked concrete is the one serious not the deco part

for unker stimix ... concrete beam

No contractor will be so stupid-lah to replace concrete beam wth poly...The cost of kena sue & etc not worth it.

The top part already a concrete & sufficient dy, the arch is just a deco lah...Even a non engineer like me also know it's a deco..Well, probably wanna better deco, can use those deco bridge in Putrajaya ..also deco & not real support..but not poly for sure

Why u slowpoke? China already made one (or more) ages ago in their country.

if the bridge is really made of polysterene, and it can normal load of cars or ppl passing, that's an engineering feat to be proud of.

and if it's just a decoration, what's the fuss about? if they made it from concrete and wire mesh, you guys will still complaint over the costs too.

sometimes, msian just don't know what they want. just oppose anything for the sake of opposing.

better than in china.made of lterally rubbish

no rosak = no collapse = no rebuild = no contract = no allocation = no oppurtunity to songlap... this is the to be continued story behind.

pay king83 RM500 to jump on bridge until it collapse.