im getting 5k discount !!!!

The pricing is all wrong.it is an old engine.possibly an old platform as well but perhaps enhanced. And the competitors are selling all round better values at 10k less. Yes toyota the brand is valuable but it WILL NOT do it this time

For me, it's a tool for getting things done and as far as passion is concerned - pretty much nonexistent for this car.

my mom confirm buy camry 2.5, i agree with her bcoz other car the parts could be a bit problematic n cost higher.. eventho the spec is not top notch, but still toyota has proven its reliability and cost effective maintenance..

bcoz of that i need to pay her current car loan which is vios.. huhu , i cannot chose car for my self lol..

wah wah. now iphone vs samsung war pulak.

japan vs korea?

come back to topic pls. Just try to justify this pls:
Compare outgoing camry and new camry
1) New Camry highest spec rm10k more exp
2) New Camry removed the most important feature that even Altis 1.8/2.0 has, VSC!

Now, please tell me how to justify buying this crap?         

Anyway, my friend told me, his friend (car seller) is selling the new Camry 2.5 for only RM155,000.

my wife already talking about lexus ch200.

Yes, CT200h is naise car. Luxury hybrid. Ride good, and also comfort.
Belum cuba belum tahu, setelah cuba, hali hali mau.
Later you will buang the camry aside liao
vey taicho, don't seduce people plox

pssss..... I heard gomen want to lower luxury car tax liao. Nao jew could buy BMW F30 less than 200k. 
PS: I heard only
banyak pening liao.

yalo... i chap lap nanti

you must believe bos. No.... You must believe gomen....

Toyota SA is very desperate in pushing the sales of 2.5V Camry.....looks fishy, any comment?

Will UMW launch another version in the nearest time to include more airbags and VSC due to many complaints from consumers??

I only have to drive 10 minutes to get my Latio and Toyota serviced.

On the contrary:

1 hour for K5.

2++ hours for VW.

This discussion sure can go on and on. But the fact is this, safety standards have risen everywhere else in the world, so why would you want to settle for anything less if you don't have to or have the financial means not too. If the government is willing to step in and demand that all future vehicles, whether big or small at least provide those safety features, wouldn't it be much better for everyone overall? We talk about now, what past is the past, what's important is the future, and the important thing is to have safety standards continually improve instead of going backwards.

So in this case, how can anyone even justify what Toyota did is good for the industry and motorist in general? Removing 2 important safety features that shouldn't have been removed in the first place and for what? Good car or not, there's no denying they've gone backwards in terms of safety.

Btw, there's so many people out there who buy Toyota cars without even test driving or seeing the car first, the new Camry isn't an exception. Like it or not, the brand is rock solid and they've been around long enough that people trust them enough to buy them but eventually, if they continue doing this, the gen Y that moves up to replace the gen X will not hesitate to ignore their offerings.

Many of those who bought Protons and Perodua's also didnt face problems in the first 2 months rite? So whats your point? U expecting problems in the first few months?

i will wait for MAzda 6 2013 

Frankly speaking, have a special liking for the new 2.5L Camry and now contemplating.....uh very tough decision.

This only applies to Asian countries mind you. Toyota has a totally different approach to customers in US, Europe and Australia. It all boils down to what the paying customer accepts. As long as Malaysians keep accepting low safety standards for higher pricing, then car makers like Toyota will continue to feed us with vehicles which come with the lack of such important features.

180K for the 2.0L? Who told you that?

No way the upcoming Mazda 6 2.0L will be 180K la especially now since we have more competitors in the D segment as compared to before. I would expect the new Mazda 6 2.0L to be around 160K (OTR) using the Camry 2.0G as a benchmark.

The Camry won't come close to the upcoming Mazda 6 in terms of design, specs, performance and handling.

Hmmm, I dunno. It would be foolish to go after a niche market for them.

From a personal point of view, I would not pay an amount that is higher than their continental competitors - it's just like I would not pay 180k for the Camry because the brand and the car is not worth the asking price. So even if the M6 can throw in all the bells and whistles, I'd still find it hard to justify paying so much money.... and for a Japanese car!!!

I believe the smarter thing for them to do is throw in almost all the bells and whistles or at least have 3/4 of all the gadgets found on the K5, keep 6 airbags and price it around 160k to 165k and they've got a solid Camry killer.