Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Yes YES 4G *resume* blocking file hosting sites, Banhammer in place again!

views
     
rizvanrp
post Jun 30 2011, 01:05 PM

Getting Started
Group Icon
Elite
195 posts

Joined: Sep 2006



QUOTE(RAMChYLD @ Jun 30 2011, 10:22 AM)
Same. The block seems to be back up sad.gif

I figured out a bypass, but it is confirmed that it's a routing block. All signs point to a linux iptables-style blockage. Also, since these blockages are likely logged (I am quite well versed with the way IPTables worked), it is possible that the log will be scruntinized and the workaround be fixed soon.

Here's how to do it. No point keeping it a secret since it's logged on their effing server. You'll need to be already on GoogleDNS first:
1. Open a tab and point it to a nonexistant page on Megaupload's site to get a 404 (ie. www.megaupload.com/\)
2. Open another tab and load Megaupload again. It will work.
3. After a while the connection will fail again. Go back to the tab with the 404 and refresh.
4. You'll earn yourself another few minutes
5. Rinse and repeat.

This is definitely a no-go for large files when using a free account or having no account at all, since you cannot resume.

For once Linux is a villain here sad.gif

The best way is to just cut off Yes and let them pokai and die.
*
From what you describe, it doesn't look like an iptables block. If they wanted to just block destination IP ranges, they would just drop the routes for it. Less CPU usage, no need to read into TCP/IP headers so much. Anyway if opening a tab twice works, it means they could be using DPI which fails on pipelined HTTP requests. If you can open a non-existant page on megaupload.com, it means :

1) Using another DNS works -- they're not touching DNS queries. You can still resolve *.megaupload.com to whatever IP.

2) There is no route block, you can still reach megaupload's subnet.

3) When you first 404 on megaupload, your browser has opened 1 TCP connection to megaupload.com. The second *valid* request is then pipelined through that same TCP connection (as per the HTTP/1.1 RFC spec) and their DPI doesn't pick up on it because it's only logging the first few bytes of the TCP stream. I've seen this behavior on TM's Streamyx DPI last year which I believe was a Sandvine box.

So basically, to bypass this without a VPN you could open a TCP connection with megaupload.com on TCP port 80, send a fake invalid HTTP request such as :

CODE
GET /\ HTTP/1.1\r\n
Host: blah.com\r\n
\r\n\r\n


.. then follow up with a :

CODE
GET /your_valid_sub_url_here HTTP/1.1\r\n
Host: megaupload.com\r\n
\r\n\r\n


That's what your browser is probably doing anyway smile.gif Of course, you would need to program a tool to automate this behavior (unless you like piping binary data out manually from netcat) but it works.

rizvanrp
post Jun 30 2011, 09:31 PM

Getting Started
Group Icon
Elite
195 posts

Joined: Sep 2006



QUOTE(RAMChYLD @ Jun 30 2011, 08:50 PM)
*sigh* really shows which ISP really cares for the rakyat. Nevermind that Yes is already s*** expensive, but it's determination to subdue the subscribers really show us their true colors.
*
I think its more obvious in mobile/wireless ISPs that the trend is to attempt to save as much bandwidth as possible. They already had the DPI boxes in place, might as well use it to enforce a gov order if it's going to save them bandwidth. Any ISP operator would be able to tell you that its nearly impossible to blacklist a website.

Anyway, I'm just curious why people still subscribe to single download services like MU/FS/HF when there are multi-DDL site services available for lower prices on the net? Not rapidleech or anything but the ones that allow you to proxy through them to download as a premium user. That's what I use on my Unifi line and I get 20mbps to any DDL site easily :3
rizvanrp
post Jun 30 2011, 09:56 PM

Getting Started
Group Icon
Elite
195 posts

Joined: Sep 2006



QUOTE(huey_yeng @ Jun 30 2011, 09:41 PM)
For me I use it to upload video files for oversea clients (as they have premium FS account).  tongue.gif

I'm curious on the multi-DDL site services that you mentioned? Any examples? :3
*
I'm currently using real-debrid.com. I've tried a few other sites like it but they normally have speed caps at like 10mbps. It's about RM18 for 30 days. I guess I can understand if you need to upload files but if you're just a leecher.. =x
rizvanrp
post Jun 30 2011, 10:09 PM

Getting Started
Group Icon
Elite
195 posts

Joined: Sep 2006



QUOTE(Icehart @ Jun 30 2011, 10:05 PM)
I don't understand how that's going to help YES as YES earn its revenue from pay per use basis. Why would they want to save the bandwidth?  hmm.gif
*
Wireless base stations don't exactly have unlimited bandwidth, doesn't matter how much you pay if the infra can't support it :3

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0165sec    0.38    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 05:14 AM