Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Are property prices going to up further? V3

views
     
prody
post Jun 28 2011, 01:26 PM

Dance while the record spins
******
Senior Member
1,548 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(cranx @ Jun 28 2011, 01:00 PM)
change of thread title..good one.  laugh.gif

assuming the sharp increase started in 2009, assuming property boom and bust cycle is around 6 years, we might be looking at 2014.
those who have waited, you are only half way there, are you going to wait further or take the plunge ?

*
Definitely wait. I bought my house in 2005 and was thinking of upgrading to a nicer home in 2010 so had a look at the prices then.
I was pleasantly surprised that my own home had appreciated by about 80%.

Then I had a look at potential places for upgrading and saw that the prices in those places also had increased by a similar margin.

After some thinking I decided it was not worth spending additional x amount to move to a nicer place, which I can use for many years for other things such as child's education, holidays, electronics, food, etc.

I don't mind staying in my current home as I did my research back then to pick a good one. I will definitely stay here unless prices come down in a big way again. It's simply not worth the extra money to upgrade from my current house.


prody
post Jun 28 2011, 02:35 PM

Dance while the record spins
******
Senior Member
1,548 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(lucerne @ Jun 28 2011, 01:57 PM)
if the price drop due to poor economy, yr current prop also drop. r u sure u still want to upgrade as u need to folk out more $ while your job is uncertain?
like i said, why u all hope for a crash?  if we work harder/smarter , we earn more and we can upgrade to a better home. since everyone earn more, the economy is good, more investments pouring and more opp for all.  and i like to compare to shanghai again. the ppl there are happy and many upgrade to better home, as they know they will earn more due to their high compentency in workplace and many mnc are coming to hire more ppl to expand biz. now china looking to expand internal consumption, old day=made in china, now= made for china. if u stay in sh long enough u will know how efficient is their ppl. from sales coordinator up to managers.  also their courier service can reach within a day in sh. i found even sg also cant match...no one in sh expect their doc to arrive the next day...cant imagine how hard working the chinese ppl.. bank are open til late nite, all bank open on weekend.. inter bank giro transfer can reach next hour, outstation /province giro can reach few hours later. how we to compete ??
*
If both prices drop in similar matter it will be cheaper for me to upgrade.
Of course if my job is uncertain I won't upgrade. smile.gif
My motto is more like "work to live" instead of "live to work" so I won't go working harder just to give some developer more profits.
I will only upgrade my home if I feel prices are normalized and my job is secure.

A crash is not necessary, but I do wish that the current trend of a slow drop in property prices in Malaysia continues and that the drop in property prices also starts in Klang Valley. Property bubbles are not good for the economy.





prody
post Jun 30 2011, 11:10 AM

Dance while the record spins
******
Senior Member
1,548 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(lucerne @ Jun 30 2011, 09:34 AM)
how many highly paid msian in oversea (eg sg, sh, anz, ME etc)? some reported 1mil.
if every of htem buy ave prop, so 1mil x 3 = 3mil

what is total house in msia? 6mil?

[attachmentid=2304058]


Added on June 30, 2011, 9:36 amsorry, average 3 prop per oversea msian

existing stock = 4.5mil , new supply /completion= 1.5mil, total 6mil???


Added on June 30, 2011, 9:40 amso if ave every year 3mil , then 20 years = 60mil units
oversea msian oni 5%.. but maybe they supported hi end prop then


Added on June 30, 2011, 9:43 amif really total units is 60mil, then every msian owned 2 units.
*
rclxub.gif

Are you saying that you expect all overseas Malaysians to buy 3 properties a year for the next 20 years?

This post has been edited by prody: Jun 30 2011, 11:12 AM
prody
post Jul 7 2011, 05:08 PM

Dance while the record spins
******
Senior Member
1,548 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(cherroy @ Jul 7 2011, 04:37 PM)
Statutory Reserves Requirement, aka money that need to set aside by banks and hold on/by BNM SRR regulation.

It just means money that cannot be used to loan out.
For eg. bank has Rm100 deposit if SRR is 3%, only RM97 can be used to loan out to make money/profit.

So higher SRR means higher cost to bank, so they may not able to give more discount on BLR.
*
I think the above is correct.

Definition: Statutory Reserve Requirement is a monetary policy instrument available to Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) for the purposes of liquidity management. Effectively, banking institutions namely commercial banks, merchant/investment banks and Islamic banks are required to maintain balances in their Statutory Reserve Accounts (SRA) equivalent to a certain proportion of their eligible liabilities (EL), this proportion being the SRR rate.

This post has been edited by prody: Jul 8 2011, 09:17 AM
prody
post Jul 7 2011, 05:17 PM

Dance while the record spins
******
Senior Member
1,548 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(CKHong @ Jul 7 2011, 05:11 PM)
got example? i think with example will be easier for us to understand.. i googled also came out that.. end up i duno what it means..  english bad  sad.gif
*
Thanks Cherroy! Learned something. smile.gif

SRA/EL = SRR

SRA = Statutory Reserve Account
EL = Eligible liabilities
SRR = Statutory Reserve Rate

This is correct:
Let's say the bank has 100 RM in deposits, assets (EL), with SRR of 1%, they need to deposit 1 RM with central bank (SRA) , then can loan out the rest
Let's say the bank has 100 RM in deposits, assets (EL), with SRR of 2%, they need to deposit 2 RM with central bank (SRA) , then can loan out the rest.

This is wrong:

Let's say the bank holds 100 RM (SRA), with SRR of 1%, they can loan out 10,000 RM (EL).
Let's say the bank holds 100 RM (SRA), with SRR of 2%, they can loan out 5,000 RM (EL).

This post has been edited by prody: Jul 8 2011, 09:23 AM
prody
post Jul 7 2011, 06:43 PM

Dance while the record spins
******
Senior Member
1,548 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(godutch @ Jul 7 2011, 06:12 PM)
OPR remained unchanged, but SRR inceased 1% to 4%. biggrin.gif
i believe this is the correct answer rclxms.gif

prody's first explanation (from the net) is something like an academic/formal answer to SRR, while cherroy gives an example to explain prody's explanation.

but prody's example is not correct. It is impossible that the banks can loan out money based on your formula.
*
BNM calculation looks the same: See Appendix 2
prody
post Jul 8 2011, 09:14 AM

Dance while the record spins
******
Senior Member
1,548 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(cherroy @ Jul 7 2011, 11:27 PM)
No increase likely on BLR.

But may be slight effect on BLR -x.x%.


Added on July 7, 2011, 11:42 pm
http://www.bnm.gov.my/guidelines/01_bankin...ry_20090701.pdf
EL is deposit that bank get aka money that bank hold or borrow from. 

It has nothing to do with bank asset, aka loan out.

You want to loan ouy, you must have money to loan out.
Commercial bank cannot create money out of thin air.

If bank has RM100, they cannot loan out Rm5,000.
They need to borrow in RM4900, be it in the form of attracting more deposit in, or borrow from interbank.

What if SRR is 0%?
Can loan unlimited?  biggrin.gif
Commercial bank cannot create money out of thin air.
*
Good thing I'm not in financing. smile.gif

I was always under the impression that banks can loan out much more then their deposits, so I thought it was because of this SRR.
Anyway, it's actually because of the "deposit creation multiplier". Bank gets a deposit. Then lends out most of the money. Then somebody else deposits the money at the bank again. Then bank loans out most of the money again etc. etc.

prody
post Jul 16 2011, 03:24 PM

Dance while the record spins
******
Senior Member
1,548 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(godutch @ Jul 14 2011, 04:42 PM)
hi, i think it is how the power unit is called, kilowatt per hour (kWh), so it is 300kWh, that means households with monthly eletricity bill of above RM70-80 (can't remember for sure the price now after the hike) will be affected.  blink.gif


Added on July 14, 2011, 4:45 pm
thank you for sharing.

really not sure this whether another round of QE will scare investors to flee emerging market or not? coz really the impact of QE so far only to creat assets bubbles in the East.

any tycos here got info to share? notworthy.gif
*
You will have used 1 kWh when you run equipment consuming 1 kW for 1 hour.

For example: a 1 hp aircon consumes 0.75 kW.
If you run it for 8 hours it will have consumed 0.75 x 8 = 6 kWh
If you run it for the whole month every night for 8 hours your power consumption for this aircon is: 0.75 x 8 x 30 = 180 kWh
prody
post Aug 4 2011, 04:49 PM

Dance while the record spins
******
Senior Member
1,548 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(smwah @ Aug 3 2011, 08:58 PM)
So is time for us to purchase few units in kl for our future kids? Still can't so sure.... some ppl stay as far as seremban to travel daily to work. Do we need to be so rush to buy houses?
*
Looking at the chart above it's better to buy in US.
prody
post Aug 7 2011, 06:27 PM

Dance while the record spins
******
Senior Member
1,548 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(lucerne @ Aug 6 2011, 10:47 AM)
so in short, prop will never drop in msia. it can only go higher..
*
Average property price has already dropped in Malaysia.
prody
post Aug 8 2011, 10:58 AM

Dance while the record spins
******
Senior Member
1,548 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(kh8668 @ Aug 7 2011, 07:32 PM)
Can share the data?
*
QUOTE(humble_tot @ Aug 8 2011, 02:25 AM)
appreciate u can share the data or elaborate some examples.. I see price no drop @iproperty. Maybe the price there not updated yet.
*
From 24 May in V2.

Prices of properties in Malaysia have dropped in Q1 2011 vs Q4 2010.
Malaysian house price index dropped from 146.9 to 145.7.
So looks like market reacted very fast to the increase in LTV and BLR.

http://www.jpph.gov.my/V1/pdf/IHRM_Q1_2011_P.pdf

Prices of landed in KL are still going up.
Prices of high rise in KL have stagnated already.
prody
post Aug 15 2011, 01:06 PM

Dance while the record spins
******
Senior Member
1,548 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(cloudwan0 @ Aug 13 2011, 12:00 PM)
all the $ earn they still need to deduce the management fees, expenses, ceo pocket $, gov songlup and what ever fees...
that y cant  >6%
y dont invest your $ in fund, there are alot of fund out there perform very well, some of them is getting 10%~15% return.
properties or gov bond is not the only choose...
*
If anybody wishes to put their money in a fund they should do some major research first as you can also easily lose 10-15%.
prody
post Sep 3 2011, 04:14 PM

Dance while the record spins
******
Senior Member
1,548 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(lucerne @ Sep 3 2011, 11:12 AM)
in this case, it is safe to buy prop in area whihc is not overbuild lor.  i dun know which areas gave 5/95, DIBS, ZEC, rebate 10-20% etc but prop near my areas (setapak/wangsa/gombak/rampai, pj/kelana, KL centre/ampang etc) do not have this goodies so i think my areas are consider still very safe.  new prop near my areas always selling very fast (almost sold out b4 launching) and some projects need insider connection to buy in advance to get better view/units. (especially commercial units). i also noticed once VP-ed, almost all units are tenanted and i strongly believed under contructions will be the same. for me, i still prefer to buy prop near populated area. (within 10km from KL , PJ)

maybe someone can highlight whihc areas hv offerred goodies so we all can avoid investing there? i recalled sp setia, sime did that , who else? but i dun know where is the areas. putrajaya/cyberjaya, shah alam?  pls share
*
It's good to think positive, but it's even better to have a back-up plan if your "safe areas" are also affected.
prody
post Sep 6 2011, 09:27 AM

Dance while the record spins
******
Senior Member
1,548 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(debtismoney @ Sep 5 2011, 08:11 PM)

-A housing affordability chart carried in the The Edge Financial Daily on August 15 showed that property prices had risen from 5.9 times income in 1989 to 10.9 times income in 2010.
QUOTE(hazairi @ Sep 6 2011, 08:52 AM)

"Household debt at 77 per cent of GDP (gross domestic product) is now the highest in Asia, with debt service approaching half of household income, even before the OPR was raised.


*
These numbers are very bad.
prody
post Sep 6 2011, 09:52 AM

Dance while the record spins
******
Senior Member
1,548 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(sampool @ Sep 6 2011, 09:39 AM)
simple question.. how many can affort without salary income or rental income for continue 6 months (at least)? ... if unaffordable, is this ppl going to sell their non performance asset during bad times?? and How many willing to pickup these asset for 6 months (at least) continues in lost..??
*
I guess some will have to.

Some others will start to panic when they see their assets paper profit start to drop.


prody
post Sep 7 2011, 09:39 AM

Dance while the record spins
******
Senior Member
1,548 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(Gary1981 @ Sep 6 2011, 06:55 PM)
I just move in my new house @ 2 months, my opposite neighbours is selling abt RM100k higher of my purchase price..
All said, if u are buying for own stay, just go ahead and search for reasonablke selling price house and not overpriced.
*
A house near to mine has been on sale for a few years already. The asking price keeps on increasing (I think they are asking about 10% above selling prices here) and it remains unsold. It will be difficult for them to sell it if prices start to drop.
prody
post Sep 7 2011, 02:01 PM

Dance while the record spins
******
Senior Member
1,548 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(kidmad @ Sep 7 2011, 11:48 AM)
My impression is, the housing markets in Tokyo/NYC haven't hit bottom yet, I might be wrong.
They had NEVER went down before and it would stay stagnant. The are more ppl wanting to move in instead of move out. Such area do you really think there is a chance the bubble will burst and everyone would want to sell them at below market value? double think.
I suggest you do some research on Tokyo and New York housing prices.
prody
post Sep 7 2011, 02:55 PM

Dance while the record spins
******
Senior Member
1,548 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(kidmad @ Sep 7 2011, 02:41 PM)
So enlighten me if i am wrong. As far as i know my colleagues in JP are the ones who told me houses in TOKYO had never budge from it's original price thus they have to stay 40 minutes away from their working place. New York? The rental is going up yearly, if you can't afford there... come back again in 10 years time. Well so far i get to see lotta charts showing the downfall for houses value and price but for a studio apartment which i browse in London area 1 is still the same today as compare to last year. The value did not appreciate but it did not went down from my observation. I might be wrong cause i'm only benchmarking on a certain area due to some interest on the places. 

So if you have some facts and data to correct me please do so. I do not live in Tokyo thus i rely on my colleagues who are working there to share and discuss about our living expenses. Same goes to the information i got from my colleagues who are working in Beijing, Phoenix Seattle and Prague.
*
No problem.

Tokyo

New York
prody
post Sep 7 2011, 03:04 PM

Dance while the record spins
******
Senior Member
1,548 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(kidmad @ Sep 7 2011, 02:59 PM)
Nice charts bro. Don't they tell you that prices after 2007 is stagnant? I believe you've seen it for yourselves from the charts.
*
I believe you mentioned prices never dropped? smile.gif

For New York prices have not been stagnant since 2007.
prody
post Sep 8 2011, 09:21 AM

Dance while the record spins
******
Senior Member
1,548 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(nkhong @ Sep 7 2011, 11:16 PM)
So stock and property which one do you think is safer investment?
*
In a normal situation property values tend to go up slow and steadily. Stock values are more volatile, so property would be a safer investment.

In the current situation where property values have gone up very fast, stocks are the safer investment.
The reason is that if the market goes down you can sell your stocks easily and your losses will be small.



2 Pages  1 2 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0238sec    0.44    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 01:39 AM