accidently burnt onli know
nwo running perfect, one day u smell smoke
Sempron64 2500+ , 2800+ OC tests
|
|
Jan 24 2006, 06:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
954 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Anywhere! |
siao
accidently burnt onli know nwo running perfect, one day u smell smoke |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 24 2006, 07:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
954 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Anywhere! |
lol who know som electric component in the proc edi burnt
|
|
|
Jan 24 2006, 07:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
954 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Anywhere! |
haha okokok jus joking
|
|
|
Jan 26 2006, 05:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
954 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Anywhere! |
hell my sempron at 315fsb, i run pi 1mb, 8mb, 16mb, 32mb, then burn in 18hours, running 3dmark06, no crash at all, but it jus failed within second in sp2004....
should it be consider stable? |
|
|
Jan 26 2006, 06:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
954 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Anywhere! |
lol u r not a truly OCer arent u?
y dun giv it a try, maybe it wil run exceed ur expectation! |
|
|
Jan 27 2006, 10:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
954 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Anywhere! |
suggest u dun use 150 divider(hehe wtm tel me one), i tried it, it wil limit ur OC even though ur ram stable
sempron mem controller r quite picky |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 27 2006, 11:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
954 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Anywhere! |
|
|
|
Jan 28 2006, 11:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
954 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Anywhere! |
maybe u r rite, but if u hav choice dun use tat, strange divider wil giv prob, in my case
anyway soulfly u run ur proc at 1.63V all the time? |
|
|
Jan 30 2006, 06:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
954 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Anywhere! |
yea s64 low on temp.
try use lower divider see if ur proc can go higher maybe ur ram hit the wall\ btw 315 stable prime/sp2004?play game dun indicate stable, in som case it wil fail instantly in prime. 1.58V is quite high...too high may oso limit OC, coz too hot, 41C i think not accurate la, mine use TT beetle 1.55V oso full load 44C This post has been edited by superpc: Jan 30 2006, 06:26 PM |
|
|
Jan 30 2006, 08:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
954 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Anywhere! |
walao 3 hours sure not enuf one, nid 8 hours, stress it tonite then tell us the result
ram is 1 stick? seems 1 stick 1 GB doesnt giv gd result, dunno la but i see many ppl wif 256mb or 512mb got gd result, anyone clarify this? |
|
|
Jan 30 2006, 09:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
954 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Anywhere! |
change the async latency and read preamble time
try different combination see which suit u but my suggestion is stress ur proc overnite 1st, make sure it is not ur proc prob, then onli change mem timing btw i wonder y the socket 754 OC database nvr update? This post has been edited by superpc: Jan 30 2006, 10:00 PM |
|
|
Jan 30 2006, 10:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
954 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Anywhere! |
err means try different timing for the 2 options la
then wat combination giv the best stability it mean "suit u" lo |
|
|
Jan 30 2006, 10:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
954 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Anywhere! |
hehe then he mus hav enuf time testing both cpu and ram, 8 hours for cpu and 300-500 loops for memtest
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 9 2006, 05:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
954 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Anywhere! |
mine oso same
i guess maybe 2x 2 low for it to boot vtec_rock....if u can do 330htt wif 3100....tel me ya, seems like impossible mission unless u got extreme part |
|
|
Feb 13 2006, 04:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
954 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Anywhere! |
lol ur sig, sempron is not venice, is palermo
1.6v full load 45C quite safe, ns water cooling bro nf3 temp keep below 50C is ok i think |
|
|
Feb 20 2006, 05:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
954 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Anywhere! |
|
|
|
Mar 21 2006, 06:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
954 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Anywhere! |
QUOTE(sidewinderz @ Mar 18 2006, 10:29 AM) amm, not much ppl so lucky got ns batch le, ns batch can hit wifout prob, but not every chip can wo, last time my 2500+ onli get to 2.3 highest arghbut wif ns mobo and som other ns important component, should hav no prob for most sempron |
|
|
Mar 24 2006, 07:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
954 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Anywhere! |
somtimes temperature low isnt represent tat a proc is stable, the component inside wil damaged coz of the high vcore
u c, if max temp is 69C, u try pump 1.7V wif default heatsink, then the temp wil be around 55-60C which is stil 10V below the max temp, u think it is safe? |
|
|
Mar 27 2006, 09:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
954 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Anywhere! |
rite under 1.6V is safe IMO, provided u hav good PSU oso
|
|
|
Mar 27 2006, 10:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
954 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: Anywhere! |
|
| Change to: | 0.0306sec
0.24
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 09:52 AM |