Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 ▪● Kia Sportage Owners Club ▪● V1, The Power To Surprise

views
     
cybermaster98
post Mar 1 2013, 01:07 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


The Kia Sportage is gonna face very stiff competition from the upcoming Honda CRV when its launched next Tuesday. The CRV has better specs and if the price is kept to <152K, you can be sure it will take a chunk out of the Sportage sales unless Naza Kia start offering discounts.
cybermaster98
post Mar 1 2013, 01:15 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(digitheatre @ Mar 1 2013, 01:12 PM)
Better specs ?
Yes. Better than the Sportage for sure. These are some of the CRV 2.0L specs:

1) 6 airbags
2) ABS, EBD, BA
3) Stability Control
4) Emergency Stop System (ESS)
5) Lane Keeping Assist System (LKAS)
6) Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC)
7) Collision Mitigation Braking System (CMBS)
8) Hill Decent Control (HDC)
9) Speed sensitive electric steering
10) Improved real time AWD system

Only drawback is the 5 speed auto.

This post has been edited by cybermaster98: Mar 1 2013, 01:42 PM
cybermaster98
post Mar 1 2013, 01:38 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(19Peter78 @ Mar 1 2013, 01:29 PM)
Cant say i like the looks of the new cr-v another uncle car buy it will add 10 years to your age atleast lol beter tint the windows with 10% visibility hahaha dont wanna be seen in 1 of those. After all resale vallue of kia or honda does not make much difference anymore going for sportage any day
Looks wise the Sportage surely looks better. But besides this, the Sportage is no longer value for money compared to the upcoming CRV. Honda has upped the ante and if they can keep prices affordable with a 5 year unlimited mileage warranty thrown in, the CRV will be a clear winner in the medium range SUV bracket. The Sportage has been enjoying good sales for the past 6 mths but if Naza Kia doesnt start offering some decent promos now, their sales of the Sportage could take a big hit soon enough.
cybermaster98
post Mar 1 2013, 02:44 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(digitheatre @ Mar 1 2013, 02:27 PM)
Those are pretty normal specs that also offered by sportage..maybe crv is better in certain area but i wont call the crv are better specs... I will take the advanced dynamax AWD system any day...new crv already came out long ago in other parts of the world..at that time review for crv also not so impressive compared to sportage...even till now sportage as 2011 car still looks and specs better than most of the latest cars
Does the Sportage come with the following?

1) Emergency Stop System (ESS)
2) Lane Keeping Assist System (LKAS)
3) Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC)
4) Collision Mitigation Braking System (CMBS)

If the answer is no to the above, then the CRV does have better specs. Period.

Its pointless talking about reviews and comparing the Sportage with other models out there. We are comparing spec to spec between the Sportage and the CRV and mind you the CRV has got some decent reviews out there. It doesnt matter if the Sportage is a 2011 model or not. As long as this is the model in the market, then this will be the model that will be compared.

Dont forget that the Japanese cars still have better engines, smoother auto transmissions and more efficient power delivery systems compared to the Koreans. This is an area which the Koreans need to improve on very soon. Offering better spec'd cars and affordable pricing is a great move but they have to start improving the drive trains if they wanna keep up with the Japs and Europeans.
cybermaster98
post Mar 1 2013, 02:55 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(19Peter78 @ Mar 1 2013, 02:23 PM)
1) 6 airbags Sportage Got
2) ABS, EBD, BA Sportage Got
3) Stability Control Sportage Got
4) Emergency Stop System (ESS)
5) Lane Keeping Assist System (LKAS) Have to keep an eye on the road anyway so gives another reason for peeps not to pay attention not sure if a good idea in malaysia lol
6) Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) have to admit cruise controle for sportage sucks
7) Collision Mitigation Braking System (CMBS) dont have
8) Hill Decent Control (HDC) dont have but after all got brakes for that
9) Speed sensitive electric steering Sportage got
10) Improved real time AWD system Not sure if sportage got something similair

not sure with which sportage you checked but sportage got an upgrade last october

Cant find anything converming the price of the crv but the expected prices are all above 150k

can be me but dont see any daylight driving lights or rear fog lights have to say to beable to make your self visible is important in my opinion if not all the savety features in the car are worthless specially during heavy rain
The list i provided is not a list of what the CRV has in ADDITION to the Sportage. I gave you the list of features that the CRV has in GENERAL. I know very well what the Sportage has and doesnt have (i was among the first in the country to test drive the Sportage and it was before the launch..dont ask me how).

The point im trying to make is that the main selling advantage the new generation of Korean cars (Forte, Sportage & K5) had over the Japanese were mainly:

1) Better specs
2) Cheaper price
3) 5 year warranty period
4) Unlimited mileage warranty
5) Better design
6) Higher safety crash ratings

But with this new CRV, points 1, 3 & 4 are no longer applicable to the Sportage while No 5 is subjective. Naza Kia cannot continue to depend on point 2 & 6 to drive their sales anymore after this. They have to take action if they wish to maintain their market share.

The Japanese had the following advantages over the Koreans from Day 1 since the launch of the Forte:

1) More refined engines
2) Smoother automatic transmissions
3) Better power delivery
4) More comfort

These 4 points have yet to be replicated by the Koreans. Hence the need to continue to improve and remain competitive.

This post has been edited by cybermaster98: Mar 1 2013, 02:57 PM
cybermaster98
post Mar 1 2013, 03:01 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(19Peter78 @ Mar 1 2013, 02:56 PM)
ESS sounds to me pretty much the same as ABS LKAS is simple a system to make drivers even more lazy and pay less attention to the road the cruise control on the sportage is bad in my opinion cant go worse on that CMBS why do you want to break if you cant avoid a collision i would accelerate its proven the more mass you carry the beter your changes to walk away. the engine cant say the jap engines inpress me drove jap cars before always gave me head ache not to mention flaws in their breaking systems check out the lancer 2008 onwards power delivery of the engine have to agree the japs are beter but like has been said earlier on some area's the cr-v is beter then the sportage but on others the cr-v is worse then the sportage you also need to remember the current sportage is around nearly 2 years longer then the "new" cr-v have to say took honda a mighty long time to catch up
Sorry but i think this is total crap and you know it. This just makes you sound like sour grapes much like how UMW tried to justify their ommision of the Stability Control feature on the Camry. Salesman talk doesnt get you anywhere. If u dont know what ESS is then please do the neccessary research before talking. Based on what you just said, it seems you dont even know what ABS is for. doh.gif

If you knew me well enough, u would know that i own a K5 and im a Korean supporter but facts are facts and only those who have limited knowledge about cars will deny the points ive made above.

Never be a blind supporter of anything. Even though i own a K5, i will readily admit its flaws in comparison to the Camry and other D segments out there. Facts are facts and that cannot change.

This post has been edited by cybermaster98: Mar 1 2013, 03:05 PM
cybermaster98
post Mar 1 2013, 03:57 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(digitheatre @ Mar 1 2013, 03:35 PM)
hehe suddenly the list become shorter tongue.gif
if u care to read my previous post i said crv MAYBE better in some area.. but I won't buy cars based on that specs alone. So does new CRV come with leather? let say it is not, so can u still say CRV has better specs for people who looking for leather seats as higher priority? specs at certain point can be subjective too it is not 'period'.

anyway..talking about generalize statement between korean cars vs japanese cars , transmission bla2 .. i won't bother to get into the argument...i would rather compare same range & model or cars to determine which is the better.

and without the official price of the new CRV..it is kinda waste of time also to argue.. if it come out with 150k price tag like normally it did last time.. it is no brainer I would rather go for cheaper 12k car
*
The list stayed the same. I ammended the list to show the specs which the CRV has IN ADDITION to the Sportage since some of the guys here couldnt understand simple English. Im sure u have a better command or the language dont you?

The CRV is the SAME RANGE as the Sportage. What the heck are you talking about? Do you even know what ure saying? Im actually shocked that Kia has such owners who know practically NOTHING about cars. You wont get into that argument cuz u dont know what ure talking about obviously.

If the CRV came out with a 150K price tag, it would still be a BETTER CHOICE compared to the Sportage. A difference of 12K with all the extras plus a more refined and proven engine, better handling and more efficient power delivery is surely WORTH the price.

Only an ignorant person who doesnt know much about cars would say the Sportage is good value compared to the upcoming CRV. Did you know that NAZA is already worried about the upcoming CRV? Did you know about the meeting they had in Glenmarie on 19 Feb to discuss this CRV because that's when they got the spec list? They already know the pricing and despite the higher price tag, they know that the CRV will be a threat to their sales. Dont ask me how i know but i know. If Naza themselves realise this, it would be utter ignorance on your part to keep saying the Sportage is a clear choice compared to the CRV.




cybermaster98
post Mar 1 2013, 04:25 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(19Peter78 @ Mar 1 2013, 03:20 PM)
actually my preferance goes to the k5 but due to delivery problems had to change to sportage am no fan of suv's and no fan of kia either just bought the car because the way it looks and the package it came with but was a 2nd choice

ESS most likely comes to pretencion the seatbelts adjusting seat to a safe position adjust headrest to safe position just before the impact. abs is anti block sytem to keep controle over your car instead of sliding over the road due to blocked wheel because of your breaking and road surface conditions

but to claim european and jap engines are beter...... correct if you go for audi bmw mercedes volkswagen skoda (afterall skoda VW and audi use the same engines) but these are all in a different price range and class then the honda cr-v or sportage but for the french (peugeot citroen renault) (btw these 3 also share the same engines)and italian (fiat) cars they are also not the best engines around specially for mechanics to service the layout is a nightmare and i believe jap or korean engines are able to compete very well with these european engines

The only 2 problems i got with the current sportage is the cruise controle and the fuel consumption doing 11.6L/100km (compared to my previous cars 9L/100km or beter all were also 2L engines)
Allow me to make a few things clear since you dont know much about cars in the first place.

ESS = Emergency Stop System is a system similar to BMW, Merc, Audi and a number of other cars which will automatically activate the brake and hazard lights during hard braking. The lights will blink rapidly to warn following vehicles that the CR-V is stopping abruptly, alleviating the risk of a collision. Nothing to do with moving seats.

ABS = Anti Lock Braking System which prevents wheel lock up during emergency braking and allows you to safely navigate around the obstacle. It also prevents lock up so that you dont skid and slam into an obstacle. It usually does not shorten braking distance. It does not control the car for you. It just controls the wheels. You still need to react and navigate as required.

CMBS = Collision Mitigation Braking System warns of an impending collision and applies the brakes to minimise an impact. Functions like the City Stop system on the new Ford Focus and probably works only at low speeds.

Its COMMON KNOWLEDGE that Korean engines are far from the best. Im not comparing against luxury makes. Even compared to the old generation Camry 2.0L engine, the Korean Theta 2 isnt as refined. Thats a FACT.

I dont see whats the problem in servicing conti cars. What layout are u talking? Do u even know what ure talking about? Even i can do a simple engine oil and filter replacement. Aint rocket science. Btw, we are not talking about servicing and maintenance here. Im refering to the QUALITY OF THE ENGINE. And yes u are right about Jap engines being able to compete with the European makes but please dont say Korean engines are of the same pedigree. They arent. They have improved but they have a long way to go.

Anyway, the discussion here is about the CRV vs the Sportage right?




cybermaster98
post Mar 4 2013, 09:10 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(19Peter78 @ Mar 1 2013, 04:51 PM)
good luck in a french car lol did you even drive a french car before? am not sure if the sportage still uses the theta2 engine or that they swapt it to the new euro 4 engine and dont over rate the european engines lol not everything made in europe is good 
hmm means i over rated the safety system for the cmbs because thats what the mercs bmw audi cars do also
beside i never said the korean engines were the best only said the are compatable with most other engines now a days there is no such thing as an unreliable engine compared to the mid 90's now it is more based on bad luck if you got a bad engine

beside you talk about a car you dont drive yourself on a daily basis best case you went for a 5km test drive so the only way you can compare the sportage with other cars is based on a 10 to 15 min experience (got a feeling that was also before the last upgrade) and the rest from paper and make you opinion about it we as sportage owner know what our cars can do and cant do where the strength lies and were the weaknesses so stop about claiming how good the cr-v is because that 1 aint for sale yet most likely dont even have test drive units yet so how to compare. but so far my experience with honda has been far from good so in my opinion most other car brands are beter then a honda not to mention the looks they got wanna make you puke but like i said this is my opinion wanna talk honda go to a honda blog
U really have a problem understanding simple English eh? Nobody is talking about quality issues with a car. Im refering to FACTS about the Korean cars in general which are FACTS because its been PROVEN. Only an ignorant person like you would claim that the Korean engine is REFINED. Do you even know whats the meaning of refined? I guess not which is why u can't seem to argue your points with any knowledge. Do you know what is POWER DELIVERY? Again u dont rite? Typical.

Facts remain facts and i dont need to OWN a Sportage to know that. I own a Optima K5 and the engine is the same. Or didnt you know that? So i am speaking with ACTUAL OWNERSHIP KNOWLEDGE and at least im able to speak with factual knowledge rather than some fanboy argument which clearly shows your lack of maturity.

If you dont know much about cars, then ask questions and learn. Dont continue to be ignorant. Ignorance gets you nowhere.

(Btw, my family has 3 generations of Peugeot in addition to Kia's, Hyundai's and Toyota's. So i know exactly what im talking about unlike you. biggrin.gif )

This post has been edited by cybermaster98: Mar 4 2013, 09:14 AM
cybermaster98
post Mar 4 2013, 09:13 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(digitheatre @ Mar 1 2013, 04:52 PM)
yes..better choice to YOU..not necessary same to other people.. unless you have driven the new crv ..i would love to read about your review.

if zweimmk is correct..4 airbags & no leather.. I also can say only ignorant person can say crv is better spec than sportage.. for some ppl like 19Peter78 above, if the car don't have leather seat means it is probably a deal breaker already.. as I said, spec can also be subjective.. not all people have the same priorities

in the end what matter is those certain specs & test drive result determine what people going to buy. with no final specs & price of the new crv also means this discussion are going no where .. suddenly Honda announce crv price is 180k or 100k.. i'm sure all opinions will change instantly haha  tongue.gif
That 19Peter78 is a guy who knows almost ZERO about cars. So for a typical ignorant guy like him, leather seats would surely be more important that a refined engine, better road handling and more efficient power delivery cuz he knows nothing about all these. And if you think along the same lines, then i suppose ure in the same boat. biggrin.gif
cybermaster98
post Mar 4 2013, 10:33 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(digitheatre @ Mar 4 2013, 10:24 AM)
we know u are the 'cyber' master of cars & test drives record holder in lowyat etc.. but no need to look down on others.. we the ZERO knowledge cars person same as many of people out there, sometimes will look for different aspect of a car to justify their purchase. as long as the car up to their standard of driving comfort/handling/power plus it comes with necessary feature for family guy like 19Peter78 for example leather seats (easy to maintain for family with children & improve comfortness) .. it is considered better to them rather than focusing on the 'so called refined engine that u admired' which in most cases after few years u won't even notice it  whistling.gif
I too was a ZERO knowledge person until i took the interest and made the effort to learn from others. If we continue to stick to what we know and not improve ourselves, we will remain at that same level.

Btw, im a family man as well.
cybermaster98
post Mar 4 2013, 02:43 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(19Peter78 @ Mar 4 2013, 02:37 PM)
Leatherseats compared to fabric seats is for me a hygene point I can have a engine so refined but if the interior causes trouble to the passengers health due to leaking child bottles or others food stuff a child can drop on the seats i prefer to go for a less refined engine but with seats that are easier to clean

and by reading the posts above i came to a conclusion you dont talk with your mouth but with your ass only useless shit comes out of you so just plug it gets bit smelly here      tongue.gif
Well said! rclxms.gif Why didnt u just buy a Myvi at half the price and have leather seats installed? And please spare me the bullshit about space cuz the Myvi has similar interior space as the Sportage and the boot space of the Sportage aint all that big either. Im sure now ull come with the safety argument eh? Ill respond to that too once uve said it.

Just goes to show how ignorant and foolish you are. You have finally realised that you have no means to have an intellectual conversation because you lack the knowledge and facts to argue so you have to resort to childish retorts to salvage yer pride.

I find it so amusing how a technical conversation about car specs can dwaddle down to such a immaterial conversation about leather seats vs all the other more important technical aspects of a car ownership. Only a fool like yourself will make a big deal out of leather seats. Im sure u didnt realise that you can get leather seats installed at any roadside car accessory shop while getting a refined engine and more efficient power delivery system may not be an item off the shelf.

A sad case of ignorance of the highest order. Kindly do not ever contribute any facts on this forum. Please dont ever go to the Mazda, VW or Audi forums and say that leather seats was among the top priorities for ya. Ull become an instant laughing stock. Kinda embarassed to say both of us are Kia owners. doh.gif

Btw, im not talking with my mouth or ass here since this is an online forum. Also baffles me how you can 'smell' on an online forum? Oops! Forgot. U lack the common sense to argue like an adult. Im just using my God given brains which ive put to good use. U wanna learn how to use yours? brows.gif

This post has been edited by cybermaster98: Mar 4 2013, 02:51 PM
cybermaster98
post Mar 4 2013, 03:04 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(19Peter78 @ Mar 4 2013, 02:48 PM)
I never said the korean engines are refined thats what you say i only said they can compete with the jap engines. btw cant really say all jap engines got a good power transfer some cut down on their power to provide a more fuel efficient car is good if you like that and talking about comfort my previous car was a lancer gt cant say that was a comfortable car due to their stiffer suspension compare to their gls or ex counter parts but the handeling was beter for the gt to bad only they had brake issues after using the ABS use it beter park your car to the side of the road for the next 2 hours so the brakes can cool down and have grip again but besides that was a fun car to drive and if jap cars are so good why did they needed to recall 100's of thousands of cars over the past few years due to electrical problems causing peeps to get seriously injured or worse and in some cases burn houses down etc now that makes you believe in the safety of their cars makes you wonder if a refined engine can make you feel beter lol cant find such articles about in this case kia that they had to recall such huge numbers of cars
Im telling you Korean engines CANNOT compete with the Japs because they lack the REFINEMENT and POWER DELIVERY. Got it? Either way you were WRONG.

Do you know anything about suspension? A suspension is hard because its tuned for handling while a soft suspension system is tuned for comfort. You cannot get the best of both worlds unless ure driving a car with adaptive suspension. Simple fact which you have clearly misunderstood.

So u really dont read that much do you? U just prove me right over and over again. The Japanese (Toyota, Nissan and Honda) are known as the among the most reliable car makers on the planet. Even the Europeans have admitted to that fact together with numerous international surveys done over the years. Only YOU are still living in the Dark Ages and thinking the other way around. Do u even know what is RELIABILITY? Its not that they wont ever break down, but the CHANCES of them breaking down is much less compared to Conti or Korean and thats a FACT.

Car recalls have been conducted by ALL car manufacturers because nobody can make a PERFECT car simply because cars are made by production lines and no production line in the world for any industry can have a perfect assembly.

U gauge a car manufacturer's recall effect by the number of cars?? How do you expect Kia to recall a LARGE number of cars when their annual sales are barely 1/3 of Toyota? doh.gif

And what nonsense are you talking about ABS being hot and no grip? ABS is a system not a brake. The system only functions during HARD braking when the tyre locks. If your previous Lancer had loss of grip issues then its a problem with your car alone as ive heard of any other Lancer with such problems.

This post has been edited by cybermaster98: Mar 4 2013, 03:09 PM
cybermaster98
post Mar 4 2013, 05:31 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(19Peter78 @ Mar 4 2013, 03:21 PM)
lmao your really a sad sad person guess you gonna trade in your k5 soon then afterall the new cr-v is all you want cant care less mate true you can install the leatherseats in the after market hell you can even buy a refined engine or anything else in the aftermarket shops to make your car more comfortable why even spend that money on a crv like you said can do that also in a myvi feel free I prefer not to drive in a coffin on wheels prefer a bit more safety but then again you can buy a helmet for each of your passengers also increases the safety of the myvi luckely there are loads of cars on the market for everybody something afterall you dont wanna drive the car you find dozens of on every car park would be bit boring to have a car like that

You just keep going about the engine the safety features and accesories on the cr-v dont know what kind of house you life in and dont care but got my car straight infront of my living area so i have to look at it alot the eye also wants to be pleased you dont want the most savest car with the most refined engine on a spot were it is a look for sore eyes after all why then design a car just make a metal box putt everything in and sell it on those points just tell peeps not to look at the exterior personally when i look at a car i try to find a car which has a combination of interior exterior safety and performance sometimes you cant get exactly what you want so you have to compromize

When i look at the sportage i see a nice looking car with 6 gears to keep rpm low when cruising in case of an accident the car has a 5 star rating from ncap means it holds the highest safety rating cars can have for pedestrians and occupance the interior is easy to clean and feels resonable solid and currently the brand is 1 of the top selling brands in europe and usa with little or no recalls of their cars for design flaws in recent years so how bad can it actually be..... to have a kia sportage smile.gif
I guess u werent reading what i wrote earlier eh? Let me explain. Do you know the difference between ACTIVE and PASSIVE safety features? The CRV has more ACTIVE safety which is more important because it helps PREVENT accidents. Airbags are passive safety which help once the impact has taken place. Which would you rather have? Better active safety or passive? Its a no brainer question.

Secondly, do u know how many trims are there for the CRV? The version with the 4 airbags is the BASE MODEL. Wait for the spec list to be revealed tomorrow and see if Honda launches a higher end model or not.

As for your comment on looks. Did u read my first few posts where i listed the advantages of the Sportage? I guess u just blabber on without checking your facts eh? Any design is subjective so its pointless talking about it. My sole point of discussion was the SPECIFICATIONS including engine, transmission and power delivery. Why do u keep diverting? Running out of points? biggrin.gif

Since u brought up safety crash ratings, did u know that the CRV got slightly higher frontal crash ratings by the NHTSA for the driver compared to the Sportage? Bet u didnt know that yet eh? biggrin.gif

Any no im not gonna trade in my K5 for the CRV simply because i have no interest in a SUV.


cybermaster98
post Mar 4 2013, 05:37 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(19Peter78 @ Mar 4 2013, 03:23 PM)
I know suspension cant give best of both worlds what i ment to say with that is i prefer to feel the road beter means i need to sacrifce comfort for handeling
Better handling has NOTHING to do with feeling the road la. Do u know whats the meaning of handling ah? If u dont know just ask la. Why keep saying things and making me laugh?

Handling refers to a number of aspects like steering feedback, cornering ability, swerving, centre of gravity, braking, road holding and aerodynamics.


cybermaster98
post Mar 4 2013, 07:08 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(19Peter78 @ Mar 4 2013, 06:38 PM)
apperently you dont know when to stop and keep going like a whinning child till people say your right even when you just keep going at a few advantages of a car and some are even advantages you as a driver should not need by simply paying attention to the road and not to the pretty girls on the side walk or children who are not wearing their safety gear (seat belt or child seat) in the car or replying a message on your phone

the remaining points you make dont weigh up for me to the looks of a car or the price none of us want to pay more then they need to feel comfortable in the car of their choice and offcourse over time cars get beter get saver to drive but you compare a car thats on the road for 3 years with a car thats on the road for 1 year then its easy to make a few adjustments to your car to be beter then a competator in the same segment

also preventing an accident is always beter then being in a crash but have to keep in mind that here in malaysia we got alot of un guided rockets on the road who disregard the safety of other road users from that point of view i believe passive safety should be equal or beter then active safety after all we all believe we are good drivers ourselfs but cant say that from others on a very regular basis. afterall active safety is mainly to prevent a mistake we make or for something unexpected that just happend in front of us but most of the time the treath comes from the rear or side at least thats my personal experience

besides the last point i made in my previous posts was my personal opinion to what i look at in a car if you feel other points are more important thats your choice/opinion afterall you dont want to drive the same car as the rest of the street atleast i dont want to drive the same car as the rest of my street
Of course everybody has their own choice. Did i say you must replace your Sportage with the CRV?? doh.gif

Did u even read my post? I said the CRV has got better specs and Naza Kia should start offering some better discounts or promos to make sure the Sportage remains attractive. It was YOU who started this war by saying that the CRV is NOT better than the Sportage but now after ive clearly proven to you that the CRV is better, now u have no where else to turn so u start talking about personal choices? Ive brought up MANY advantages of the CRV while u can only talk about design, leather seats and your 6 speed auto which is NOTHING compared to what the CRV offers.

Dont u know how to argue based on FACTS? Cant u argue in a MATURE MANNER? Being able to argue like an ADULT is about fighting fact against fact not talking about PERSONAL PREFERENCES. You brought up rubbish facts and i answered to each of your arguments.

And what 3 yr old car u refering to??? Just because a particular model arrives late in Malaysia doesnt make it a old model. Did u know that the design process for a particular model starts about 5 years before the actual launch??? As i said before, if u dont know then ask.

And since when is safety based on what you need? If that's the basis of your argument, then why u need airbags? Better just drive at 30kmph everywhere so that you wont need an airbag rite? Thats the same stupid argument that Toyota said when ppl asked them why the stability control was removed from the Camry. They said Malaysians didnt ask for it and didnt need it. U sound as foolish as them.

Before this u were talking about 5 star safety bla bla bla but now ure saying safety features based on NEED. What the hell u talking la? Nobody said the Sportage is a bad car. Its a good effort by Kia but they cannot afford to rest. The competition from the Japanese is very stiff. Honda especially is improving alot in the past 2 years. Now with the CRV, it will again become the best selling SUV and it will affect the sales of the Sportage. Only an ignorant person like you will not see this threat.

This post has been edited by cybermaster98: Mar 4 2013, 07:10 PM
cybermaster98
post Mar 6 2013, 12:16 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(19Peter78 @ Mar 4 2013, 07:36 PM)
safety features are a need and the 5 star rating is a guideline to see if the needed safety features claimed and provided by the manufaturer actually work. and you claim you argue in an adult matter by insulting people you argue with cant say thats a very adult way of arguing. offcourse the new cr-v will affect the sales of the sportage any new suw or facelifted suv will do that specially in the beginning after all we all want to be the first to drive the car we choose to buy and offcourse kia need to keep their head in the game and move forward like any other car manyfacturer but to claim the cr-v we are talking about has the beter specs some point yes other points no it just depends what people believe to be more important in their car and to claim you have answerd all the thing i brought in against the cr-v nope you did not everytime you point to a 2.4L cr-v with higher spec what is also expected to be another 20 to 25k more expensive then the 2.0L cr-v to say that it maybe in that version.

and i dont claim malaysians dont need airbags lol the thing with cr-v 2.0 is it only has 4 airbags i prefer more thats why i choose a car with 6 airbags and to claim a 6 speed car is nothing compared to a 5 speed think that sounds pretty ignorant to me afterall i would like to save some money on my petrol by redusing the rpm abit. thats why i said at some points the cr-v is beter but other points the sportage is beter just depends what people prefer
U think a 6 speed auto will ensure your fuel consumption remains low? doh.gif

Did u know that the 4 speed Camry 2.0L is more fuel efficient than the 6 speed K5? The same goes for the Sportage. It is not as fuel efficient as the Sportage. Thats why i keep on saying power delivery. If your power delivery is crap, then alot of that power is lost in translation and doesnt reach the wheels. Thats why Korean engines are not as fuel efficient as Japanese and its a FACT. Thats wht ive been trying to tell u all this while. Fuel consumption is not just related to gear ratios. There are many other factors which determine that. Go do some reading up instead of trying to argue here with ZERO knowledge.
cybermaster98
post Mar 6 2013, 04:37 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(digitheatre @ Mar 6 2013, 02:14 PM)
haha..but..but he said the CRV he admired so much has the so called refined engine bla2 whatever.. hehe..less PS..less torque..same old retuned r20a but still REFINED what.. worth even 20k extra  rclxms.gif  whistling.gif
Im actually laughing at u bro. Until today u still have no idea what a refined engine is. In your little world, refinement is about horsepower. Such a pity. Such limited automotive knowledge. brows.gif
cybermaster98
post Mar 6 2013, 04:39 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(digitheatre @ Mar 6 2013, 02:55 PM)
that's not my point.. I already know where the Japs stand in terms of engine & technology etc..that's why I have no interest to get into that kind of discussion.. otherwise might as well get a honda city where u can have cheapest Honda engine u can buy.. what matter most is the reliability of the whole car.. every parts count.. and don't come out with Jap reliability higher etc2.. again it will only lead to generalize statement
..to come here and justify CRV has better spec with "PERIOD" word some more show how ignorant someone can be.. people always see one thing differently and it is something that person can't comprehend
nvm..anyhow.. something we can always agree on..this new crv will still sell like hot cakes in malaysia  biggrin.gif
U suddenly realise where the Japs stand in terms of engine and tech? When u have no where to turn then u claim to have known something all along? U really make me laugh.

I suppose you have conveniently forgotten my first statement in which i said the new CRV will eat into the Sportage sales and naza needs to do something to boost sales e.g promos, discounts, etc.

But i give u credit for 1 thing. U backed out of the discussion when it got too technical. Sadly for that Peter guy, his ego continued to rule and he ended up embarassing himself with his clear lack of knowledge. Imagine driving a 138K vehicle and not knowing what ABS stands for. Pathetic! biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by cybermaster98: Mar 6 2013, 04:47 PM
cybermaster98
post Mar 6 2013, 04:43 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,440 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(19Peter78 @ Mar 6 2013, 03:03 PM)
cybermaster98 next time when a persons drags you out with mistakes he/she claims beter check a website were they mention most commen mistakes or interpretations about cars you might find most of my post are pure copy paste from there but have to admit you gave me a good laugh over the past few days specially yesterday when i checked out the specs of the "new" cr-v  tongue.gif
Well we both know that u werent laughing cuz u were busy getting thrashed by your own words. I used everything u said against you and u were desperately twisting and turning to get out of the hole u dug yerself into. And now u think u can escape by juist saying u were lauging at me the past few days? LOL

Try harder kiddo. Im sure ull do better.

Btw, in case u dont already know, Zweimmk and i were having a private conversation where i told him a couple of days ago that the premium specs will only be in the 2.4L model. And im sure ull realise that a couple means 2 days ago which was BEFORE the CRV was launched last nite.

So what exactly were u laughing about? biggrin.gif



3 Pages < 1 2 3 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0624sec    0.48    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 05:10 AM