Shortest faster for under 1000cc
Middle faster for under 1.3-1.6cc
Longer faster for under 1.8-3.5 cc
experiment : petrol RON95 comparison in Malaysia, longest or shortest burning better?? News
|
|
 Jun 1 2011, 04:50 PM
|
 
Junior Member
169 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Selangor   
|
|
Quote|
|
Jun 1 2011, 05:18 PM
|
Junior Member
29 posts Joined: Jul 2009 From: MALAYSIA maksudnya Tanah Melayu dalam bahasa latin
|
^ u have a very nice cute face
  |
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 05:25 PM
|
Junior Member
243 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(empire23 @ Jun 1 2011, 04:43 PM) Nothing here makes any sense since the burning isn't done at the right compression, has no atomization, the AFR is all wrong and the TS is a known moron.    |
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 05:25 PM
|
Junior Member
553 posts Joined: Oct 2009
|
QUOTE(Seybold @ Jun 1 2011, 04:50 PM) Shortest faster for under 1000cc mana chili sos?Middle faster for under 1.3-1.6cc Longer faster for under 1.8-3.5 cc |
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 05:30 PM
|
Senior Member
1,185 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Not Found 
|
I thought faster mean more pick up. So no need to press so much?!!?
|
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 05:30 PM
|
Senior Member
3,725 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: In /hardware/
|
The fuel efficiency of your car still depends of the way you drive.
|
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 05:41 PM
|
Junior Member
214 posts Joined: Jun 2006
|
uhhhh but unburned fuel gonna churn out from ur exhaust.
so choose the most fastest burning fuel??? to eliminate wastage?? i donno but everytime i use petronas,my fuel consumption sarkssss. Persona car. |
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 05:42 PM
|
Junior Member
413 posts Joined: Nov 2008 From: Cyberjaya, Selangor 
|
QUOTE(hack3line @ Jun 1 2011, 05:18 PM) ^ u have a very nice cute face fap fap fap |
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 05:43 PM
|
Senior Member
5,369 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(empire23 @ Jun 1 2011, 07:43 PM) Nothing here makes any sense since the burning isn't done at the right compression, has no atomization, the AFR is all wrong and the TS is a known moron. +1 |
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 05:46 PM
|
|
Junior Member
156 posts Joined: Jan 2011
|
QUOTE(empire23 @ Jun 1 2011, 04:43 PM) Nothing here makes any sense since the burning isn't done at the right compression, has no atomization, the AFR is all wrong and the TS is a known moron. since when in /K/ any sh1t makes sense?  |
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 05:59 PM
|
All Stars
21,963 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: KL 
|
QUOTE(NINJIAO @ Jun 1 2011, 05:41 PM) uhhhh but unburned fuel gonna churn out from ur exhaust. Car makers should find a way to recycle the fumes from exhaust as petrol again so choose the most fastest burning fuel??? to eliminate wastage?? i donno but everytime i use petronas,my fuel consumption sarkssss. Persona car.  |
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 06:29 PM
|
|
Junior Member
64 posts Joined: Aug 2008
|
yo TS, maybe you should compare between 95 and 97 for the same brand and same amount.
It should give a rough view of whether burns fastest or slowest is the best. never thought of this method though, even it is a doubtful methodology but still a good idea |
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 06:41 PM
|
Senior Member
559 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
QUOTE(empire23 @ Jun 1 2011, 04:43 PM) Nothing here makes any sense since the burning isn't done at the right compression, has no atomization, the AFR is all wrong and the TS is a known moron. +1 |
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 11:49 PM
|
Junior Member
240 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: From JB to KL!
|
QUOTE(empire23 @ Jun 1 2011, 04:43 PM) Nothing here makes any sense since the burning isn't done at the right compression, has no atomization, the AFR is all wrong and the TS is a known moron. kesian hack3line.... |
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 11:57 PM
|
Junior Member
249 posts Joined: Mar 2010
|
so many uncontrolled factor here, oxygen level, AFR, etc. This test prove only one thing. and you know what that is. troll.
|
|
|
Jun 2 2011, 12:00 AM
|
|
Junior Member
29 posts Joined: Jul 2009 From: MALAYSIA maksudnya Tanah Melayu dalam bahasa latin
|
anyway profile of video uploader..
http://www.youtube.com/user/keretadotinfo Profile Name:kereta Channel Views: 2,461 Total Upload Views: 505,911 Age: 24 Joined: Apr 9, 2008 Last Visit Date: 3 days ago Subscribers: 31 Website: http://kereta.info About Me: admin kereta.info Country: Malaysia This post has been edited by hack3line: Jun 2 2011, 12:00 AM |
|
|
Jun 2 2011, 12:03 AM
|
|
Junior Member
249 posts Joined: Mar 2010
|
QUOTE(WaCKy-Angel @ Jun 1 2011, 05:59 PM) Car makers should find a way to recycle the fumes from exhaust as petrol again They've found it long time ago. Exhaust Gas Recirculation. |
|
|
Jun 2 2011, 12:07 AM
|
Junior Member
165 posts Joined: Mar 2007
|
apa ka bangang nak buat comparison minyak enjin kat luar enjin
bang, dalam enjin tu, ada compression ratio, air fuel ratio, lepas tu ada sesetengah enjin guna direct injection, carburetor, so kena jugak tengok dari segi benda2 macam tu kalau nak buat comparison pun, at least buat dalam satu enjin terkawal, baru ada makna makasih |
|
|
Jun 2 2011, 12:09 AM
|
Senior Member
766 posts Joined: Nov 2005 From: Slim Shady Town
|
the point is why there is a different in burning time ?
|
|
|
Jun 2 2011, 12:12 AM
|
|
Junior Member
249 posts Joined: Mar 2010
|
QUOTE(jimmydotnet @ Jun 2 2011, 12:09 AM) the point is why there is a different in burning time ? variables like oxygen levels, source of ignition, dan byk lagi. |
| Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic |
| Change to: |  0.0201sec
 1.45
 5 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 01:41 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.