PETRONAS RON95 ~ 35.57 seconds
SHELL RON95 ~ 31.59 seconds
BHP RON95 ~ 30.53 seconds
MOBIL RON95 ~ 26.44 seconds
ESSO RON95 ~ 26.04 seconds
CALTEX RON95 ~ 25.36 seconds
experiment done at home..
experiment : petrol RON95 comparison in Malaysia, longest or shortest burning better?? News
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 04:28 PM, updated 15y ago
Show posts by this member only | Post
#1
|
![]()
Junior Member
29 posts Joined: Jul 2009 From: MALAYSIA maksudnya Tanah Melayu dalam bahasa latin |
video uploaded on 21 July ~ 2010
PETRONAS RON95 ~ 35.57 seconds SHELL RON95 ~ 31.59 seconds BHP RON95 ~ 30.53 seconds MOBIL RON95 ~ 26.44 seconds ESSO RON95 ~ 26.04 seconds CALTEX RON95 ~ 25.36 seconds experiment done at home.. |
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 04:29 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,970 posts Joined: Nov 2007 |
so petronas wins?
|
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 04:31 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Feb 2008 |
i think burn fastest is more concentrated and burn slower means less fuel
|
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 04:33 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#4
|
![]()
Junior Member
6 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
so which one the best ron95 ? i heard caltex ron95 is the best ..is it true?
|
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 04:33 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,494 posts Joined: Feb 2009 |
so....i think burn longer use less fuel la bodoh...
u see...a single drop of fuel can be burn for 10 seconds for an example. if petrollnas can burn 10 seconds , caltex can burn longer 15seconds. so caltex > petrollnas. |
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 04:34 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#6
|
![]()
Junior Member
24 posts Joined: Jul 2009 |
lambat bakar lambat pegi
|
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 04:35 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
328 posts Joined: Jul 2008 |
QUOTE(kahjye @ Jun 1 2011, 04:33 PM) so....i think burn longer use less fuel la bodoh... low fuel burn = low fuel consumption = $$$$u see...a single drop of fuel can be burn for 10 seconds for an example. if petrollnas can burn 10 seconds , caltex can burn longer 15seconds. so caltex > petrollnas. not sure about power tho |
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 04:36 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
216 posts Joined: Jan 2010 |
not to fast not to slow.... so shell wins??
|
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 04:36 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#9
|
![]()
Junior Member
23 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: East Coast of Cuba. |
cepat terbakar more pickup???
|
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 04:36 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
216 posts Joined: Jan 2010 |
|
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 04:38 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,494 posts Joined: Feb 2009 |
|
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 04:38 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,234 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
|
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 04:39 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,970 posts Joined: Nov 2007 |
explain how engine works please
|
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 04:40 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
37 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
|
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 04:40 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
147 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
|
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 04:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,494 posts Joined: Feb 2009 |
|
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 04:43 PM
|
|
Staff
9,417 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Bladin Point, Northern Territory |
Nothing here makes any sense since the burning isn't done at the right compression, has no atomization, the AFR is all wrong and the TS is a known moron.
|
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 04:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
312 posts Joined: Jan 2010 |
eh...enough of the who knows who knows la....im interested to know
|
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 04:44 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
236 posts Joined: Jul 2007 From: Penang |
|
|
|
Jun 1 2011, 04:48 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
4 posts Joined: Mar 2011 |
this video totally fuk up...
|
| Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0212sec
0.79
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 09:11 AM |