LOL you two. I am wroking from morning till night.
then attend evening class. =\


Haha.. Will do that later, maybe on next shooting.
Well, I have no clue of making this thing. just somehow end up like this. hahaha

This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jun 16 2011, 08:14 PM

yes you can. confirm!

This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jun 16 2011, 09:50 PM

DSC_5471 by aldosoesilo, on Flickr

This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jun 16 2011, 10:08 PM

Haha..
Nice pattern there.

10.5mm need VR for what?
never seen any fish eye lens with VR, IS, VC, OS, or anything like that.

just tested 80-200 2.8 from BTS.
kinda hard to shoot at 200mm w/o VR. =\ maybe just my shaky hand

This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jun 19 2011, 02:16 AM

Fancy Motorbike by aldosoesilo, on Flickr

hot chicks for ya man!

Curious Aunties by aldosoesilo, on Flickr

thanks.

last time did some action shooting of break dancing with 50mm 1.4 @wide open
damn.
a lot of chopped and OOF.
Need to learn more action shooting. hahaha

Morning contribution from me.

http://nikonrumors.com/2011/06/22/nikon-pa...-update-3.aspx/
bro CY seems like 50mm 1.2 is coming real soon. hahaha
ready for saving. hahaha

---

Added on June 23, 2011, 12:58 amlearning about quality light these days.. I just realize I often ignore light source information such as quality, shade, etc etc.. need to learn a lot of stuffs in photography.

This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jun 23 2011, 12:58 AM

what I know is pointing 90 degree w/o bounce will give some fill flash effect. where pointing back ward w/o wall or thing like that is hahaha

I am not saying about bounce flash. I am saying about fill flash.
90 degree you will have a nice shadow worr for me only maybe.

---

Added on June 23, 2011, 2:40 pmyou sounds but hurt man.
a lot of ppl who didn't earn moneh from photography own 200mm f2 lor, hahaha.. Joking...

This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jun 23 2011, 02:47 PM

Err.. maybe 200mm f2 is quite an exaggeration. but I believe there is some1 who own it w/o generating any moneh from photography.

how if I say the father of my friend has 5dmII and 7d as the body having 18-135 kit.
17-40L, 70-200L, 24-70L. w/o even able to control his camera well.
victim of sales man in my country. hahaha

last time I did my own project.
shoot at ISO 200 also got visible noise.
I am kind of shock. well that happen because I try to make dark area visible w/o using flash. try it!

buy VRII no need to worry.


Spot metering does work like old film camera, instead of meter for the whole frame (matrix) or partial of the frame which mostly center (centered metering), this spot metering only meter a dot (the are of your active focus dot) this is useful to tell your camera not to calculate the unwanted light source which coming an hits your camera sensor. e.g backlit

Street Yow! by aldosoesilo, on Flickr

If you shoot RAW. NR useless lor..
Correct me if I am wrong. hahaha

---

Added on June 26, 2011, 7:08 pm
Street Yow! by aldosoesilo, on Flickr

---

Added on June 26, 2011, 7:11 pm
Street Yow! by aldosoesilo, on Flickr

This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jun 26 2011, 07:11 PM

80-200 two touch. hard to control. at least for me. at 200mm shake kao kao.
newbie like me cannot use that.

You will be shocked if I said that is the most expensive pieces of glass for DX. would ya?

Focusing accuracy is another thing to concern.
50 1.8D speed of focusing is damn cun!
but accuracy wise. it seems like struggling with itself.

Let me tell you something. if you are new in photography.
care no about noise, sharpness, etc etc etc..
what you should focus on is Composition, Exposure, and Focusing (whether it is nailed or not) but I heard there is a new technology that could save you from focusing problem.
For me. I always put composition as my main concern.
because I know even the pictar is razor sharp it would be useless if it composed badly.
Bad composed pictar will always bad, regardless your sharpness, bokeh, color, and subject.

same thing goes to focusing, no matter how good the picture is. it will be pointless if the pictar is OOF.

for exposure, you can be saved by nowadays technology. but straight correct exposure is always better. save you from time consuming PP.

for me. Nikon is not sharper than canon.
but I wouldn't deny that Nikon has better contrast and more saturated color.
Sharpness I think it is depends on the lens.

indeed. noise can be good.
1 of my favorite series.

Gunslinger by The Dream Seeker., on Flickr


anyway again my model said she is happy with my work and she is willingly offered herself to be my private model, w/o any payment.
she can be a good help for me to learn studio setup.
it's been quite sometimes since I keep my interest on studio.

This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jun 28 2011, 11:29 AM

aha.. don't differentiate noise la.
Now I feel bad for giving a wrong sample. hahaha

interesting knowledge for enthusiast.

it looks like OOF for me.

This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jun 30 2011, 11:02 AM

if you increase sharpness then you gain sharpness.

---

Added on July 3, 2011, 4:59 pmI didn't went trough everything but this one is well spoken sentence.

jchue73 you have a nice pictar!

This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jul 3 2011, 04:59 PM