It would be crazy if volume shooters shoot RAW.

Hope you realise that boosting the JPG sharpness does not work all the time. You get noise artifacts when you try to bump up the ISO or shoot in low light. There is a reason why Nikon put the default at a conservative 3.

The worst part about JPG files are that they are irreversible unlike RAW.

Hope you realise that boosting the JPG sharpness does not work all the time. You get noise artifacts when you try to bump up the ISO or shoot in low light. There is a reason why Nikon put the default at a conservative 3.

The worst part about JPG files are that they are irreversible unlike RAW.

Hi ,

Any idea how to get rid of fingerprint on the lens ?

I try using the lenspen and it doesn't work .

I just need help . thanks

if i'm that right makcik, i'll be asking, kenapa muka makcik blur?

Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 VC.. this lens had a good bokeh?

First time hearing about the thread wearing out. Nikon body AF motor too powerful?

great wide angle lens but not the best.. i owned this lens and sold it after a year. the CA is not that good..
hey canon user!! shuuh! shuuh! shuuh! 

That's the reason I sold it off... the colour so dull... 

Doing 200mm @ 1/8s, you still able to get tact sharp image or acceptable quality? That's my definition of "great" in the sentence earlier.
Yeah. It's wayyy heavier than the kit lens, but with more solid handheld. Now I'll be carrying D7000 + BG + 17-55 + SB-900 weight for the entire day of shooting!

On DX bodies, you need at least about 1/125. If you're a beginner, trying something faster like 1/160 or 1/200.

Why the flower blocking their faces?

It could be intentional... but I couldn't get the idea