Wat time?

oh so got lar such transaction happened?

I think, it need some times to digest so many units to rent/sell 1st then only hv more opportunity to get a good rental/selling price.

I have a Malaysian tenant wish to view Parklane soon, I tried to propose him 1300-1400.
Then he said many owners put 1K-1.2K only @_@

Ya, sometime tenant very good at 'calculation' 

To be honest,I am specialize at Bukit Jalil instead of Old Klang Road, only an owner=one of my good client wanna rent out with 1,2 K.

Thk, move in 15/12, someone help me pay installment for next 2 year, jobs done for parklane, move to next.

One of the reasons why I'm not that active in property threads nowadays is because of the stupidity of some forumers here, not being able to comprehend simple, English words.

The formula for density is units / area. Somehow, most people assume that a large number will automatically mean a high density, which is obviously not the case.

In this instance, there are 4,225 units at Parklane OUG but it is actually spread over a land of 30.08 acres, giving it a density of 141 units/acre.

Z-Residence, on the other hand, has 1,136 units over a 7 acre land and thus, its density is 163 units/acre.

Some more expensive developments have even higher density. Take for example The Petalz, 565 units sitting on top of a tiny land of 3.04 acres. That's a stunning 186 units/acre.

Yet, the dumb forumers would immediately jump and defend The Petalz and Z-Residence as compared to Parklane OUG. "The Petalz must surely be of low density since there are only a few hundred units while Parklane OUG is immensely densed, there's a freaking 4,000 units!"

Interesting to know who these people actually are and what do they do for a living. If they are students, I would most probably be able to guess their grades for Maths.