Spot ON, Nic !!!
Not the REAL Unboxing...more like another promo vid!

Enjoy !!
Something MORE realistic than the Eskimo's!

---

Added on April 22, 2011, 2:41 pmOn WHY LED is better overall than LCD...

Enjoy...



This post has been edited by StopSpamming: Apr 22 2011, 02:59 PM

From the GPS coordinates : 53°57.909"N, 1° 3.837"W

It is in Barnsley, north of Sheffield, as shown in Google Maps!
The road name is Stacey Crescent !!

It is a retail unit from UK...it is there before 27 April 2011 !!

This post has been edited by StopSpamming: Apr 22 2011, 08:02 PM

How long is this "quite some time now"???

---

Added on April 23, 2011, 10:49 amWHY would you want the HTC Sensation???

HTC's Plus Point :-
1) Resolution : 960x540 vs Samsung's 800x480.
But Sammy's Super AMOLED+ has 12 subpixels instead of 8 subpixels in SLCD of HTC.
Hence in finer details, HTC only has 7,680x4,320 subpixels compared to Sammy's 9,600x5,760 subpixels.

SGS II's Plus Points :-
1) RAM : 1GB vc HTC's 768 MB
2) Thickness : 8.49mm vs HTC's 11.30mm
3) Weight : 116g vc HTC's 148g
4) HSPA+ : 21Mbps vc HTC's 14.4Mbps
5) Front Camera : 2MPixel vs HTC's VGA
6) Battery : 1,650mAh vc HTC's 1,520mAh
7) Internal Memory : 16GB/32GB vs HTC's 1GB
8) Others : WiFi Direct, NFC Chip, DivX Playback...and more!










This post has been edited by StopSpamming: Apr 23 2011, 10:49 AM

No wonder!
I thought I saw a box on Thursday night,
but they refused to let me see further or take a sneak peek.

The stock must be here already??








This post has been edited by StopSpamming: Apr 23 2011, 11:42 AM

On a 3rd floor of a "Menara" in UEP Subang Jaya!

No way SGS II will be as inferior as iPhone 4...
If I bought 5 units of iPhone 4 to sell off 4 units to keep my 5th unit free,
in SGS II, I will buy a container to make a huge profit....kakakaka!!!

Yugaabe is from Philippines, IIRC.
But it is a prototype SGS II, not retail version.

buntutwoman says so, ya??!!!

Indeed! The Japs and Koreans have their own queer ways to conduct business.






Thanks for reminding us all that it is still a MAGNIFICENT hardware.

Please be so kind to tell what kind of reasoning we should seek at this launch,
and what were the lackings that we all should watch out for, for the "something for everyone"??






Hit THAT to the head of the nail, buntutwoman !!!
They lack stamina to engage us on exhilaration senses, right!!!
Hehehe...we should add Tongkat Ali for Samsung...Korean ginseng not enough!






Thanks for alerting us on that CAVEAT ! Almost miss it !
So the coast is clear for us all to go up to the shore with i9100?

Hear ye, hear ye, coast guard has announced the proclamation !!!

Look at site AGAIN : eXpansys Singapore

The price dropped AGAIN to now : S$ 934.45...



Tomorrow???

NOT released in Singapore yet, right???

STILL no further news on where we can queue up??

Sigh...

Anyone interested to pay a SURPRISED visit to Andrew Cheong of Samsung Mobile Malaysia??

Wow, what a claim !!!
Android was around since October 2003,
but the first iPhone came ONLY in June 2007!!

The claim states, "Whithout iPhone we might wont have Android"
as if "Whithout the son we might wont have the father".

The father might not look as cool or as stunning as the son,
and could have transformed after seeing the son's coolness,
yet it is STILL ridiculous to say, "Without the son, we might not have the father!"

Any first year biological student will tell you that,
"Without the father, we definitely will not have the son!!!"

Precisely!! Whether it was omission or otherwise,
it claimed so clearly, "Whithout iPhone we might wont have Android"...

So boldly claimed, "Without me, there won't be my father!" whether or not in any form!

Also the chicken video on eggs so vivid on SGS2...

TRUE, true...that is HTC G1...
Android has been around since 2003,
way before the first iPhone was launched.

So, it was impossible to claim that
without iPhone, there won't be Android, which exists before iPhone!

---

Added on May 3, 2011, 12:35 am



Another commercial...enjoy!!





This post has been edited by StopSpamming: May 3 2011, 12:35 AM

I don't intend to disprove I was wrong or prove that I was right here!

I would rather go back to history to bring a parallel...


Think of airplane, everyone remember the Wright brothers 1903 flight and their subsequent commercialization through its patent in 1906.
Yes, that was their US Patent 821393 for a "Flying Machine".

Before 1903, there were more than 30 human "flights" with the first was some 120 years before it in 1783 in Paris France.
That flight, though on a flying machine balloon, but did not apply for US Patent nor commercialization. It was recorded in
history as a flight of 9km in 25 minutes by Joseph-Michel and Jacques-Étienne Montgolfier.

Nobody can/will deny Wright brothers contribution to the aviation industry.

But to say, "Whithout iPhone we might wont have Android" is to say,
"Without Wrights, we might not/won't have Montgolfier."

Montgolfier existed 120 years before Wright, just like Android existed 4 years before iPhone.

Montgolfier's flying balloon machine might not be in the same format/structure/stature as the airplane today,
but to say, Without Wright, there is no Montgolfier is definitely not acceptable.

We can say, Without Wright, there is no modern day airplane or even no flying machine (as per US patent)
then we can say, without iPhone, there might not be smartphone today.

I am NOT denying iOS contribution, I just believe the earlier claim was not substantiated factually & historically
when we say "Without iPhone we might (not)/ wont have Android".


Just my contribution to the forum's discussion.