Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
EVE-Online, EVE-online discussion
|
Ashurn/Pierce
|
Nov 15 2006, 12:08 AM
|
New Member
|
QUOTE(Roland San @ Nov 14 2006, 11:59 PM) 10 seconds... let's see if it works yay! now for the killer queue loggin on Logging in.................... Character selection bar....... it's been a few minutes already...... Same deal here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashurn/Pierce
|
Nov 15 2006, 12:11 AM
|
New Member
|
Red: I think I will go and take a nap. And wake up (hopefully I can) later to set a new skill for my Kirstena Lamia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashurn/Pierce
|
Nov 15 2006, 09:38 PM
|
New Member
|
Wow, that was some big d*** your alliance have there.  Thanks for the picture Zed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashurn/Pierce
|
Nov 17 2006, 12:03 AM
|
New Member
|
Gah, hate my workplace. First the websense shit blocks the eve forums. Now they block the proxies I use too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashurn/Pierce
|
Nov 17 2006, 08:42 AM
|
New Member
|
Haha, yah lor.  You gek sim? I am still grinding for level 3 agents leh.  Persevere! This post has been edited by Ashurn/Pierce: Nov 17 2006, 08:43 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashurn/Pierce
|
Nov 17 2006, 11:03 PM
|
New Member
|
Yes! Tomorrow off. Hope can at least grind to level 3 agent tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashurn/Pierce
|
Nov 18 2006, 12:04 AM
|
New Member
|
QUOTE(Dawn_eclair @ Nov 17 2006, 11:43 PM) goodluclk ash tmr i will be out so tonite i wont be eve soo long liao Not really understood what you are trying to say here. You mean, you will not be playing anymore? Or do you mean you are not playing tomorrow?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashurn/Pierce
|
Nov 21 2006, 12:07 AM
|
New Member
|
Whoa, some screenies on the ships face uplift. http://www.battleclinic.com/forum/index.ph...pic,4580.0.htmlI heard they are coming together with the Kali I release. These are not Vista's graphics, (I've heard those are even more drool-worthy.  ) but rather DX9 version. Looking very good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashurn/Pierce
|
Nov 22 2006, 12:41 AM
|
New Member
|
Guys, what do you think of my Mission Dominix's setup/loadout?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashurn/Pierce
|
Nov 22 2006, 02:13 AM
|
New Member
|
Nope, EVE Online isn't free.
This post has been edited by Ashurn/Pierce: Nov 22 2006, 02:30 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashurn/Pierce
|
Nov 22 2006, 08:06 AM
|
New Member
|
Kana: The setup is just my ideal setup for my Dominix when Ashurn have done his training.  Plus, you all should signup for the Battleclinic site. A very good site to keep your ships' loadout and can share with one another easier. This post has been edited by Ashurn/Pierce: Nov 22 2006, 08:06 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashurn/Pierce
|
Nov 23 2006, 03:03 AM
|
New Member
|
I heard helping Sisters of EVE corp is the best since they give standing towards the 4 major faction Not sure true or not though
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashurn/Pierce
|
Nov 24 2006, 11:33 PM
|
New Member
|
Regarding Sisters of EVE, I've checked with some players liao. They give positive standing to Gallente/Minmatar and negative standing to Amarr/Caldari. So not much help there, the best way I think would be rejecting the missions that gives you negative faction standing and also do missions for the affected faction. Not much else can be done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashurn/Pierce
|
Nov 26 2006, 01:47 AM
|
New Member
|
Anyone can paste the whole patch file's text here? Something is wrong with my browser at home, I can't seem to connect to the patch change page. It just either keep on reloading or just send me back to the page where I came from.
And I love the change on no dual logging on trial accounts. Mixed feelings on skills not training anymore when account is inactive but I will still support CCP with their decision on it since it deals with money here. Hope they will finally give us a skill training queue now. XD
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashurn/Pierce
|
Nov 26 2006, 07:31 AM
|
New Member
|
QUOTE(Addicus Zed @ Nov 26 2006, 06:43 AM) You can login to dual account, just not trial account thats all. What Zed said.  Will curb those free and disposable suicide alts. At least they are limited to only one trial accout per computer so it is harder to gather a fleet of suicide kessies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashurn/Pierce
|
Nov 26 2006, 09:02 AM
|
New Member
|
OMG! YES! Warp to 0km is a dream no more!
/me dances like the penguin in Happy Feet. /me sings like that said penguin as well... /me shuts up.
And oh, I am still in office. (I work shift and this week lands me on the weekend.) Last post before I head home now. And Zzz.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashurn/Pierce
|
Nov 29 2006, 11:19 PM
|
New Member
|
Wah crazy lol. The prices on the new BC and BS of Caldari got their price jacked up so high up their ass rofl.
120 to 140m for the BC Drake. 280 to 300m for the BS Rokh.
I think I will rather buy a Raven instead of a Drake. When I have the money.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashurn/Pierce
|
Nov 30 2006, 12:50 AM
|
New Member
|
Thanks Posgrado!
Zed: Yeah I understand Tech IIs cannot be evaluated by their mineral cost but Drake and Rokh are both Tech Is. They are just Tier 2 BC and Tier 3 BS respectively.
And for a Tier 2 BC to cost more than a Tier 2 BS, which is Raven, is very wrong.
As for a Tier 3 BS, Rohk, to cost as much as 1.5 to 2 times of a Tier 2 BS, Raven? Not sure on that but I would very much believe that its those greedy buggers out to grab some fast bucks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashurn/Pierce
|
Nov 30 2006, 01:25 AM
|
New Member
|
Yah, once wreck salvage will pop.
I seriously thinking of making my Ashurn learn Salvaging liao. >.<
Maybe then next time my Ashurn can be professional salvager. Haha.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashurn/Pierce
|
Nov 30 2006, 01:38 AM
|
New Member
|
QUOTE(Addicus Zed @ Nov 30 2006, 01:35 AM) That's why i asked those who wanna evaluate T1 ship prices, base it on the mineral requirements. Can't go wrong that way  If cost for Tier2 BC is much more than the cost of Tier2 BS...so be it. We can't expect the prices to be lower just because they're Tier2 BC and not BS *grins* Haha, firstly, I seriously doubt CCP would make the requirements of minerals for the production of a BC tier 2 to be higher than tier 2 BS. Secondly, why would anyone of sane mind pay more for something less powerful when you have a cheaper alternative which is a lot better than the costlier counterpart? Which of course, this statement cannot be used for Tech II ships. Since all their price are out of wack anyway.
|
|
|
|
|