Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
6 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 AudioPhile KopiTiam, Instead of the "bragging right" thread

views
     
GenericMav
post Apr 12 2011, 10:37 PM

just call me GM
******
Senior Member
1,175 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: part of html code Status: Online



and btw, black market part is also a joke
[G]ooD_DaY
post Apr 12 2011, 10:55 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,450 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: KL


Lol, but there is right?
For this kinda stuff?
anchovies93
post Apr 12 2011, 11:13 PM

newbie
*****
Senior Member
902 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
From: Feel like i'm in Mars


QUOTE(Fusion @ Apr 12 2011, 09:44 PM)
this is my humble collection

[attachmentid=2151988]
[attachmentid=2151990]

This is my 16 bit and 24 bit Flac collection.......bout 40% ripped from my CD collection.....any interested buyer??... whistling.gif  whistling.gif
*
pm me your list. if its good, why not?
GenericMav
post Apr 12 2011, 11:36 PM

just call me GM
******
Senior Member
1,175 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: part of html code Status: Online



QUOTE(GooD_DaY @ Apr 12 2011, 10:55 PM)
Lol, but there is right?
For this kinda stuff?
*
they do, but not in black market for sure, maybe some kind of 'underground' place cool2.gif
jinggothegreat
post Apr 12 2011, 11:37 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
333 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
QUOTE(Fusion @ Apr 12 2011, 09:44 PM)
this is my humble collection

[attachmentid=2151988]
[attachmentid=2151990]

This is my 16 bit and 24 bit Flac collection.......bout 40% ripped from my CD collection.....any interested buyer??... whistling.gif  whistling.gif
*
rclxms.gif congrats.

sadly my choice of songs does scarcely come in 24bit format.

that is to mention that quite a number of homebrew metal songs, demos, and chapters that are still in cassette tape formats.
some got remastered and even sung covered by modern bands but all the originals are lost. so sad mang. sad.gif
[G]ooD_DaY
post Apr 13 2011, 08:20 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,450 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: KL


QUOTE(GenericMav @ Apr 12 2011, 11:36 PM)
they do, but not in black market for sure, maybe some kind of 'underground' place  cool2.gif
*
Haha, not willing to sell my precious collections even if I can~
laugh.gif
Angel of Deth
post Apr 13 2011, 02:43 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,242 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Cheras


QUOTE(i_djoel2000 @ Apr 11 2011, 09:53 PM)
.wav file brother..much better than .flac

if i'm not mistaken 1 file takes space around 70mb, right?
*
no, lossless is lossless. You lost nothing with it, this has proven mathematically. .wav is useful for archiving process if you're interested in recording process, not for casual listener because you can't use tagging on it.


Added on April 13, 2011, 2:46 pm
QUOTE(maknismudekots @ Apr 12 2011, 02:41 AM)
user posted image

user posted image

Some of my CDs from the time when people still buy music... tongue.gif
*
Do you have Megadeth - Killing is My Business?

This post has been edited by Angel of Deth: Apr 13 2011, 02:46 PM
tunertoobe
post Apr 13 2011, 07:29 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


Anyone has any Muse CDs to let go? blush.gif
EP, Single, album...........

This post has been edited by tunertoobe: Apr 13 2011, 07:29 PM
[G]ooD_DaY
post Apr 13 2011, 08:12 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,450 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: KL


QUOTE(Angel of Deth @ Apr 13 2011, 02:43 PM)
no, lossless is lossless. You lost nothing with it, this has proven mathematically. .wav is useful for archiving process if you're interested in recording process, not for casual listener because you can't use tagging on it.
*
Bro, mind explaining about this part? The file I ripped out is .wav but why u said it is not useful for listening huh?
tunertoobe
post Apr 13 2011, 08:27 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


QUOTE(GooD_DaY @ Apr 13 2011, 08:12 PM)
Bro, mind explaining about this part? The file I ripped out is .wav but why u said it is not useful for listening huh?
*
I think he meant that using .wav for casual listening isn't PRACTICAL. Players that reads tags wouldn't display things such as artist, album and song title. I tried, and although it seems that I can tag it, when played with Foobar2000, it still won't recognize the artist or album.

This post has been edited by tunertoobe: Apr 13 2011, 08:31 PM
[G]ooD_DaY
post Apr 13 2011, 08:37 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,450 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: KL


Tagging means renaming the file?
If yes mine work after rename file and play with Foobar wor~
tunertoobe
post Apr 13 2011, 08:43 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


QUOTE(GooD_DaY @ Apr 13 2011, 08:37 PM)
Tagging means renaming the file?
If yes mine work after rename file and play with Foobar wor~
*
No no. It means a bit like putting all the info within the file. Renaming the file name is different, tagging it embeds it with stuff like the artist, album, album year, track no., etc. etc. I use AudioShell tag editor to tag my mp3s and FLACs after ripping them. Like giving a soldier his military necklace(that metal thing around their neck, which is their ID tag). laugh.gif

Play a WAV file in Foobar2000, and you'll see that it can't display artist and album name, it can only show you the file name.

This post has been edited by tunertoobe: Apr 13 2011, 08:47 PM
Yuki Ijuin
post Apr 13 2011, 08:43 PM

I just lurk nowadays.
****
Senior Member
649 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Cheras


Tagging means putting the Artists, Year, Genre, Composer, Track number, Lyrics as well as other miscellaneous information on the file itself.
[G]ooD_DaY
post Apr 13 2011, 09:56 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,450 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: KL


QUOTE(tunertoobe @ Apr 13 2011, 08:43 PM)
No no. It means a bit like putting all the info within the file. Renaming the file name is different, tagging it embeds it with stuff like the artist, album, album year, track no., etc. etc. I use AudioShell tag editor to tag my mp3s and FLACs after ripping them. Like giving a soldier his military necklace(that metal thing around their neck, which is their ID tag).  laugh.gif

Play a WAV file in Foobar2000, and you'll see that it can't display artist and album name, it can only show you the file name.
*
Oh, yeah it only show the file name~
U tag one by one ah?
shocking.gif shocking.gif
That means only downside of .wav is cannot tag but quality better than FLAC??

QUOTE(Yuki Ijuin @ Apr 13 2011, 08:43 PM)
Tagging means putting the Artists, Year, Genre, Composer, Track number, Lyrics as well as other miscellaneous information on the file itself.
*
Noted, thx~
MrJinggles
post Apr 13 2011, 10:05 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,285 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(GooD_DaY @ Apr 13 2011, 09:56 PM)
Oh, yeah it only show the file name~
U tag one by one ah?
shocking.gif  shocking.gif
That means only downside of .wav is cannot tag but quality better than FLAC??
Noted, thx~
*
Quality is not better than FLAC, lossless is lossless. It's like the different archive formats (e.g .rar, .zip )
Yuki Ijuin
post Apr 13 2011, 10:05 PM

I just lurk nowadays.
****
Senior Member
649 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Cheras


Quality is the...
SAME
SAME
SAME
SAME
SAME
SAME
SAME
SAME
It's mathematically loseless. That means each little detail of the music is already in the file. Which = No difference in quality.
MrJinggles
post Apr 13 2011, 10:08 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,285 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(GooD_DaY @ Apr 13 2011, 09:56 PM)
Oh, yeah it only show the file name~
U tag one by one ah?
shocking.gif  shocking.gif
That means only downside of .wav is cannot tag but quality better than FLAC??
Noted, thx~
*
More info here :
http://www.ehow.com/facts_6142773_flac-vs_-wav.html
http://www.head-fi.org/forum/thread/366271...ity-differences
TSnoobandroid
post Apr 13 2011, 10:12 PM

Audiophile
********
All Stars
11,836 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
From: Kota Kinabalu, Sabah


i think i should rename this thread as "Audiophile Kopitiam", what do you people think?
BCurve
post Apr 13 2011, 10:16 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,271 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
From: Sometimes here, sometimes there.


QUOTE(noobandroid @ Apr 13 2011, 10:12 PM)
i think i should rename this thread as "Audiophile Kopitiam", what do you people think?
*
audiophile for wannabees ....

This post has been edited by BCurve: Apr 13 2011, 10:25 PM
TSnoobandroid
post Apr 13 2011, 10:55 PM

Audiophile
********
All Stars
11,836 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
From: Kota Kinabalu, Sabah


*Updated Thread Title*

6 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0280sec    1.05    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 08:26 PM