Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
INTEL OVERCLOCKING THREAD, TIPS,Q n A, Results...Great For NueBis
|
Shoot@M3
|
 Nov 6 2005, 03:03 PM
|
|
Hope I'm not too late to post mine  Specs And Technical Data ================== Original CPU/Socket : Intel Pentium4C 2.4GHz Socket 478 800MHzStepping : D1 (Code SL6WF, Batch Q322A157) <-- Made in MalaysiaDate : 6/26/2003FSB : 200Clock Speed : 2.4GHzVoltage (CPU/RAM/Chipset/AGP) : 1.525V/2.6V/?/1.55VChipset : Intel 865PERam Type/Speed/Timings : 3-3-3-8Results.(Min. 3 Filled) =============== Highest FSB : 275FSB Stable 288FSB MaxHighest RAM : 440MHz Stable 461MHz+ MaxHighest Clock Speed : 3.3GHz Stable 3.457GHz Max with CPU-ZHighest Vcore : 1.575V stable but tested at 1.8V as wellHighest VDIMM : 2.8V <-- Limit by board loh (Abit IS7-E)Benchmarks/Stability Testing/ Proof Of Testing. (Min 3 types of testing) =============================================== CPU-Z Validation : @ 3.457GHz (288FSB on Air cooling)  Prime95 / PrimeTest : Not tested <-- Not for stability purposeSuper PI/ Super PI MOD : Got used but no screenieMemtest : Not testedSandra Memory Bandwidth : 6025 3DMarks 2005 : 2376 3DMarks 2003 : 4856 3DMarks 2001SE: 15623This post has been edited by Shoot@M3: Nov 6 2005, 03:07 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shoot@M3
|
Nov 7 2005, 10:16 AM
|
|
|
The tightest I can go is around 2.5-3-3-6 I think. But it wasn't stable so I had to loosen a little. Been OC'ing it for 2 years plus now but changing the OC from time to time cos not stable for little gaming. Only recently change casing, new cooling etc etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
Shoot@M3
|
Nov 7 2005, 10:07 PM
|
|
|
Yup divider set at 5:4
My graphic only 9550V+ woh. What to expect from 3dmark05 leh?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shoot@M3
|
Nov 7 2005, 10:34 PM
|
|
|
Ho Ho Last time even worse leh. My ol skool FX5200 64-bit only get me 1100+ score in 3dmark03 leh... . Feel happier after changing to 9550. At least for now lah |
|
|
|
|
|
Shoot@M3
|
Nov 13 2005, 09:49 AM
|
|
|
Not so sure but I think what they say is celeron is not so good at OC. I had OC a 600EB to733MHz before but not stable. I think tualatin are much better in OC. Rite now using a Tualatin 1GHz OC at 1.32GHz. Rite now using it 24/7 at 32C temp load. Quite ok still. Advice is better check ur temp and dun push volt first. Make sure you lap properly the thermal paste cos I noticed before some mobo dun even fire up if you put the processor and HS wrongly <-- not touching. You may boot for a while then hang... You will know why if you take off the HS and while switched on, touch on the proc <-- erm not advisable |
|
|
|
|
|
Shoot@M3
|
Nov 14 2005, 08:33 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(epsilon99 @ Nov 13 2005, 10:59 PM) The Celeron II, the Coopermine family of 180nm process, were an excellent overclocker. The speed started from 533 until like 1000 or 1100. You had a 600EB ? That is not Celeron, but P3. E means Coopermine/180nm and B means 133mhz FSB. Celeron has only 66 and 100 FSB. For P3 of any EB speed, they were not popular among overclocker. Due to unable to clock higher. Not because of processor, but because of mobo limitation. And mobo limitation were mainly limited by the ram speed (pc100/133 sdaram). Celeron Coopermine. When first released, were the hot cake among overclockers. 566mhz at 8.5 x 66, were easily overclocked to 8.5 x >95 to achieve >800mhz speed. And better yet, eventhough Celeron has only 128k cache, compare to P3 of 256k cache, the performance at same mhz speed were less than 10% difference. But the price of a 566mhz Celeron was like 1/3 of a 800mhz P3. Oops. Yes the 600EB I mentioned was actually P3 not celeron. That means coppermine are good OC as well.  Wow, thanks for the explanation epsilon99. On my Tualatin, I was limited by the mobo settings and couldn't go any further. If only I can go further then I would be able to test how good Tualatin's are. So far haven't notice any instability on my rig yet |
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0209sec
0.49
7 queries
GZIP Disabled